Suppr超能文献

在腰椎侧方椎间融合术(LLIF)中实现间接神经减压和节段角度恢复的理想椎间融合器位置。

The Ideal Cage Position for Achieving Both Indirect Neural Decompression and Segmental Angle Restoration in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF).

作者信息

Park Se-Jun, Lee Chong-Suh, Chung Sung-Soo, Kang Sang-Soo, Park Hyun-Jin, Kim Se-Hun

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Spine Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University, School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Jul;30(6):E784-E790. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000406.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective radiographic analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the ideal cage position for lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) together.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Achieving both indirect decompression and restoration of the segmental angle (SA) appear to be contrary to one another because the anteriorly located cage might be advantageous for restoring the SA, and posteriorly located cage might be favorable for achieving the indirect decompression effect. Little has been known about the significance of cage position in LLIF.

METHODS

Forty-one patients who underwent LLIF followed by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for 94 levels were evaluated. Postoperative plain radiographs and magnetic resonance images were obtained 3 days after surgery. The cage position was determined by the anterior, middle, and posterior portions. The anterior and posterior disk heights, SA, cross-sectional area of the thecal sac (CSA), and the foraminal area (FA) were compared according to the cage position.

RESULTS

The cage was placed in the anterior area for 31 levels and middle for 63 levels. The cage height was 13.0±1.3 degrees. The increases in anterior disk height and SA were significantly greater in the anterior group (9.1 mm, 6.1 degrees) than those of the middle group (6.7 mm, 2.4 degrees). Posterior disk height increased by a mean of 4.5 mm, but its change did not differ according to the cage position. CSA and FA increased by 36.5% and 69.6%, respectively. There were no significant differences in the CSA and FA increases with respect to the cage position. Regression analysis showed that the increase of SA was affected by cage position, but the increase ratios of CSA and FA were not affected.

CONCLUSIONS

The cage position within the anterior 1/3 of disk space is better for achieving the restoration of the SA without compromising the indirect neural decompression, if the height of cage is large enough.

摘要

研究设计

前瞻性影像学分析。

目的

共同评估腰椎侧方椎间融合术(LLIF)中理想的椎间融合器位置。

背景资料总结

实现间接减压和恢复节段角(SA)似乎相互矛盾,因为位于前方的椎间融合器可能有利于恢复SA,而位于后方的椎间融合器可能有利于实现间接减压效果。关于椎间融合器位置在LLIF中的意义知之甚少。

方法

对41例行LLIF并随后行经皮椎弓根螺钉固定共94个节段的患者进行评估。术后3天获得术后X线平片和磁共振成像。椎间融合器位置根据前、中、后部分确定。根据椎间融合器位置比较前后椎间盘高度、SA、硬膜囊横截面积(CSA)和椎间孔面积(FA)。

结果

椎间融合器置于前部区域31个节段,中部区域63个节段。椎间融合器高度为13.0±1.3度。前部组的前椎间盘高度和SA增加(分别为9.1mm和6.1度)显著大于中部组(分别为6.7mm和2.4度)。后椎间盘高度平均增加4.5mm,但其变化根据椎间融合器位置无差异。CSA和FA分别增加36.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验