Suppr超能文献

基于入路的腰椎椎间融合术对矢状位脊柱骨盆参数及功能结局的影响:斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术(OLIF)与经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)的比较

Effect of Approach Based Lumbar Interbody Fusion on Sagittal Spinopelvic Parameters and Functional Outcomes: Comparison between Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) and Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF).

作者信息

Jain Mantu, Sethy Siddharth S, Sahoo Auroshish, Khan Shahnawaz, Tripathy Sujit, Ramasubbu Mathan Kumar

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751019 India.

Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand 249201 India.

出版信息

Indian J Orthop. 2024 Oct 3;59(1):40-46. doi: 10.1007/s43465-024-01229-w. eCollection 2025 Jan.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) are the most commonly conducted operations for interbody fusions. In addition to fusion, the restoration of proper spinal alignment has become crucial for achieving favorable functional outcomes. There is a lack of agreement on which lumbar interbody fusion technique provides the most effective correction for sagittal spinopelvic parameters (SSPs). This study aims to investigate the functional outcome in terms of SSPs in patients undergoing single level OLIF and TLIF for lumbar degenerative disc disease.

METHODOLOGY

Retrospective analysis of single level OLIF or TLIF was done. The patients' index and follow-up data until 6 months of surgery were collected. Radiographic parameters analysis included disc height (DH), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), pelvic index, lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lordosis (SL). Clinical outcomes were recorded using visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).

RESULTS

In a total of 38 patients (19 in each group) mean age was 51.52 ± 12.67 years in OLIF and 52.17 ± 9.73 years in TLIF. Improvement in DH was more in OLIF but not statistically significant (p = 0.075). Significant improvements were seen in PT, and SL post-TLIF. Change in SSPs among groups shown no significant differences. Both VAS and ODI shown improvements in both the groups but no significant difference was noted while comparing the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The study showed better restoration of SSPs by TLIF in terms of PT and SL although functional outcomes appear similar in both procedures. Increase in DH is the important determinant for resulting good outcome. Patients with maintained spinopelvic balance can be treated satisfactorily with less-invasive OLIF.

摘要

目的

经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)和斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术(OLIF)是最常用于椎间融合的手术。除融合外,恢复适当的脊柱对线对于获得良好的功能结果至关重要。对于哪种腰椎椎间融合技术能最有效地矫正矢状位脊柱骨盆参数(SSP),目前尚无定论。本研究旨在调查因腰椎间盘退变疾病接受单节段OLIF和TLIF手术患者的SSP功能结果。

方法

对单节段OLIF或TLIF进行回顾性分析。收集患者术前及术后6个月的随访数据。影像学参数分析包括椎间盘高度(DH)、骨盆入射角(PI)、骨盆倾斜角(PT)、骶骨倾斜角(SS)、骨盆指数、腰椎前凸(LL)、节段性前凸(SL)。使用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)和Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)记录临床结果。

结果

总共38例患者(每组19例),OLIF组平均年龄为51.52±12.67岁,TLIF组平均年龄为52.17±9.73岁。OLIF组的DH改善更明显,但差异无统计学意义(p = 0.075)。TLIF术后PT和SL有显著改善。两组间SSP的变化无显著差异。两组的VAS和ODI均有改善,但两组比较差异无统计学意义。

结论

该研究表明,尽管两种手术的功能结果相似,但TLIF在PT和SL方面对SSP的恢复更好。DH增加是获得良好结果的重要决定因素。维持脊柱骨盆平衡的患者可通过创伤较小的OLIF得到满意治疗。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验