Suppr超能文献

全髋关节置换术后,数字规划软件无法在X线平片上反映出股骨柄扭转情况。

Digital Planning Software Fails to Reflect Stem Torsion on Plain Radiographs after Total Hip Arthroplasty.

作者信息

Worlicek M, Weber M, Zeman F, Wörner M, Schneider M, Grifka J, Renkawitz T, Craiovan B

机构信息

Departement of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Regensburg, Bad Abbach, Germany.

Center of Clinical Studies, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

出版信息

Rofo. 2016 Aug;188(8):763-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-106975. Epub 2016 Jun 29.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of commercially available planning software on plain radiographs after THA compared to CT scans as the gold standard.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In a prospective clinical study, anteroposterior (AP) radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans (3D-CT) were obtained for 121 patients, who underwent minimally invasive, cementless THA with a straight tapered stem, in a lateral decubitus position. For measuring SV, we used digital planning software (TraumaCad 2.0, BrainLAB Feldkirchen, Germany). Two independent raters repeated the analysis after a six-week interval. Radiological measurements were compared with 3D-CT measurements by an independent, blinded external institute. This investigation was approved by the local ethics commission (no. 10 -121- 0263) and is a secondary analysis of a larger project (DRKS00 000 739, German Clinical Trials Register May-02 - 2011).

RESULTS

The radiograph measurements showed very high intra- and interrater agreement. The intra-class correlation (ICC) of the intrarater agreement was 0.97 for rater 1 and 0.98 for rater 2. The intrarater reliability was 0.99 using the mean values of both rater measurements. The mean difference between the average radiograph measurement and the 3D-CT-based measurement was 0.41° (SD 11.24°) (range: -33.85°-22.50°; 95 % limits of agreement: -21.63 - 22.45), but there was no correlation found between both methods.

CONCLUSION

Measuring stem version with the help of commercially available digital planning software on plain radiographs after THA has high intra- and interrater reliability but clinically inacceptable validity and reliability when compared to 3D-CT scans.

KEY POINTS

• Measuring stem torsion after THA on plain radiographs with digital planning software is not valid. Citation Format: • Worlicek M, Weber M, Zeman F et al. Digital Planning Software Fails to Reflect Stem Torsion on Plain Radiographs after Total Hip Arthroplasty. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2016; 188: 763 - 767.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估全髋关节置换术(THA)后,与作为金标准的CT扫描相比,市售规划软件在X线平片上的有效性。

患者与方法

在一项前瞻性临床研究中,对121例行微创、非骨水泥型THA且采用直锥形柄假体的患者,于侧卧位获取前后位(AP)X线片和三维CT扫描(3D-CT)图像。为测量股骨柄扭转角(SV),我们使用了数字规划软件(TraumaCad 2.0,德国BrainLAB Feldkirchen公司)。两名独立评估者在六周间隔后重复进行分析。放射学测量结果由一个独立的、不知情的外部机构与3D-CT测量结果进行比较。本研究经当地伦理委员会批准(编号:10 - 121 - 0263),是一个更大项目(DRKS00 000 739,德国临床试验注册中心,2011年5月2日)的二次分析。

结果

X线片测量结果显示评估者内及评估者间一致性非常高。评估者1的评估者内一致性组内相关系数(ICC)为0.97,评估者2为0.98。使用两名评估者测量的平均值,评估者内可靠性为0.99。X线片平均测量值与基于3D-CT的测量值之间的平均差值为0.41°(标准差11.24°)(范围:-33.85°至22.50°;95%一致性界限:-21.63至22.45),但两种方法之间未发现相关性。

结论

THA后在X线平片上借助市售数字规划软件测量股骨柄扭转角具有较高的评估者内及评估者间可靠性,但与3D-CT扫描相比,其临床有效性和可靠性不可接受。

关键点

• THA后在X线平片上使用数字规划软件测量股骨柄扭转无效。引用格式:• Worlicek M, Weber M, Zeman F等。全髋关节置换术后数字规划软件无法在X线平片上反映股骨柄扭转。《Fortschr Röntgenstr》2016年;188: 763 - 767。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验