Suppr超能文献

用于评估龋齿和牙周疾病的全景片与根尖片的对比研究。

A comparative study of panorex and periapical radiographs for evaluating caries and periodontal disease.

作者信息

Ehrlich J, Weisgold A, Updegrave W

出版信息

Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim. 1977 Oct;26(4):27-9.

PMID:273588
Abstract

Since large lesions were detected easily in both methods, it is felt that for longitudinal studies of periodontal disease in large populations the panorex with two posterior bite-wing films has the following advantages: 1. Allows recording of the entire dentition, alveolar bone continuity and surrounding structures, beyond comparison with the periapical technique. 2. Has fixed head position and alignment factors which facilitate standardization. 3. Simplicity of operation requiring minimal time and effort. 4. Low radiation exposure.

摘要

由于在两种方法中都能轻松检测到大的病变,因此认为对于大样本人群的牙周病纵向研究,全景X线片结合两张后牙咬合翼片具有以下优点:1. 能够记录整个牙列、牙槽骨连续性及周围结构,这是根尖片技术无法比拟的。2. 头部位置和对准因素固定,便于标准化。3. 操作简单,所需时间和精力最少。4. 辐射暴露低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验