Calfee M Worth, Tufts Jenia, Meyer Kathryn, McConkey Katrina, Mickelsen Leroy, Rose Laura, Dowell Chad, Delaney Lisa, Weber Angela, Morse Stephen, Chaitram Jasmine, Gray Marshall
a US Environmental Protection Agency, National Homeland Security Research Center , Research Triangle Park , North Carolina.
b Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education , Research Triangle Park , North Carolina.
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2016 Dec;13(12):980-992. doi: 10.1080/15459624.2016.1200725.
Sample collection procedures and primary receptacle (sample container and bag) decontamination methods should prevent contaminant transfer between contaminated and non-contaminated surfaces and areas during bio-incident operations. Cross-contamination of personnel, equipment, or sample containers may result in the exfiltration of biological agent from the exclusion (hot) zone and have unintended negative consequences on response resources, activities and outcomes. The current study was designed to: (1) evaluate currently recommended sample collection and packaging procedures to identify procedural steps that may increase the likelihood of spore exfiltration or contaminant transfer; (2) evaluate the efficacy of currently recommended primary receptacle decontamination procedures; and (3) evaluate the efficacy of outer packaging decontamination methods. Wet- and dry-deposited fluorescent tracer powder was used in contaminant transfer tests to qualitatively evaluate the currently-recommended sample collection procedures. Bacillus atrophaeus spores, a surrogate for Bacillus anthracis, were used to evaluate the efficacy of spray- and wipe-based decontamination procedures. Both decontamination procedures were quantitatively evaluated on three types of sample packaging materials (corrugated fiberboard, polystyrene foam, and polyethylene plastic), and two contamination mechanisms (wet or dry inoculums). Contaminant transfer results suggested that size-appropriate gloves should be worn by personnel, templates should not be taped to or removed from surfaces, and primary receptacles should be selected carefully. The decontamination tests indicated that wipe-based decontamination procedures may be more effective than spray-based procedures; efficacy was not influenced by material type but was affected by the inoculation method. Incomplete surface decontamination was observed in all tests with dry inoculums. This study provides a foundation for optimizing current B. anthracis response procedures to minimize contaminant exfiltration.
样本采集程序和一级容器(样本容器和袋子)去污方法应防止在生物事件操作期间污染物在受污染表面与未受污染表面及区域之间转移。人员、设备或样本容器的交叉污染可能导致生物制剂从隔离(热)区渗出,并对应对资源、活动和结果产生意外的负面影响。本研究旨在:(1)评估当前推荐的样本采集和包装程序,以确定可能增加孢子渗出或污染物转移可能性的程序步骤;(2)评估当前推荐的一级容器去污程序的有效性;(3)评估外包装去污方法的有效性。在污染物转移测试中使用湿沉降和干沉降荧光示踪粉来定性评估当前推荐的样本采集程序。用萎缩芽孢杆菌孢子(炭疽芽孢杆菌的替代物)评估基于喷雾和擦拭的去污程序的有效性。对三种类型的样本包装材料(瓦楞纸板、聚苯乙烯泡沫和聚乙烯塑料)以及两种污染机制(湿接种物或干接种物)对两种去污程序进行了定量评估。污染物转移结果表明,人员应佩戴尺寸合适的手套,模板不应粘贴在表面或从表面移除,并且应谨慎选择一级容器。去污测试表明,基于擦拭的去污程序可能比基于喷雾的程序更有效;有效性不受材料类型的影响,但受接种方法的影响。在所有使用干接种物的测试中均观察到表面去污不完全。本研究为优化当前炭疽芽孢杆菌应对程序以尽量减少污染物渗出奠定了基础。