Gomez Rapson, McLaren Suzanne
School of Health Sciences and Psychology, Federation University Australia.
Psychol Assess. 2017 Apr;29(4):361-371. doi: 10.1037/pas0000352. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
The present study examined measurement invariance of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in community groups of Australian heterosexual men (N = 1106), heterosexual women (N = 2111), gay men (N = 527), and lesbians (N = 712). Confirmatory factor analysis of CES-D item scores supported the theorized oblique 4-factor model. There was support for full measurement invariance across the 4 groups, based on differences in approximate fit indices. In contrast there was support for only partial invariance when the chi-square difference test was applied. Lack of invariance was mostly for depressed affect and somatic symptom items, with noninvariant somatic symptom items showing consistently high factor loadings and thresholds among lesbians compared with the other groups. The findings are discussed in relation to the use of the CES-D, the relevance of different depression symptoms to how depressions is experienced by the different gender and sexual orientation groups, and gender role socialization and minority sexual orientation theories. (PsycINFO Database Record
本研究检验了流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)在澳大利亚异性恋男性(N = 1106)、异性恋女性(N = 2111)、男同性恋者(N = 527)和女同性恋者(N = 712)社区群体中的测量不变性。对CES-D项目得分进行的验证性因素分析支持了理论上的斜交四因素模型。基于近似拟合指数的差异,支持在这4组中具有完全测量不变性。相比之下,应用卡方差异检验时仅支持部分不变性。缺乏不变性主要体现在抑郁情绪和躯体症状项目上,与其他组相比,女同性恋者中不具有不变性的躯体症状项目显示出始终较高的因素负荷和阈值。结合CES-D的使用、不同抑郁症状与不同性别和性取向群体体验抑郁方式的相关性以及性别角色社会化和少数性取向理论对研究结果进行了讨论。(PsycINFO数据库记录)