Suppr超能文献

通过批判性交流方法转变城市学校体育项目:咨询委员会的作用

Transforming a municipal school sports programme through a critical communicative methodology: The role of the of advisory committee.

作者信息

Jiménez-Herranz Borja, Manrique-Arribas Juan C, López-Pastor Víctor M, García-Bengoechea Enrique

机构信息

Faculty of Education of Segovia, University of Valladolid, Spain.

Faculty of Education of Segovia, University of Valladolid, Spain.

出版信息

Eval Program Plann. 2016 Oct;58:106-115. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jun 9.

Abstract

This research applies a communicative methodology (CM) to the transformation and improvement of the Municipal Comprehensive School Sports Programme in Segovia, Spain (MCSSP), using egalitarian dialogue, based on validity rather than power claims to achieve intersubjectivity and arrive at consensus between all of the Programme's stakeholders through the intervention of an advisory committee (AC). The AC is a body comprising representatives of all stakeholder groups involved in the programme. During the 2013-2014 academic year the programme's AC met four times, operating as a communicative focus group (CFG). The meetings focused on: (1) excluding dimensions (barriers preventing transformation) and transforming dimensions (ways of overcoming barriers), (2) the programme's strengths, (3) the programme's weaknesses and specific actions to remedy them, and (4) the resulting conclusions which were then incorporated into the subsequent programme contract signed between the University and the Segovia Local Authority for 2014-2018. The key conclusions were: (1) the recommendations of the AC widen the range of perspectives and help the research team to make key decisions and (2) the use of CM to fully evaluate the programme and to reach a consensus on how to improve it proved very valuable.

摘要

本研究采用一种交际方法(CM),通过平等对话,对西班牙塞戈维亚市的综合学校体育项目(MCSSP)进行变革与改进。这种对话基于有效性而非权力主张,以实现主体间性,并通过一个咨询委员会(AC)的干预,使该项目的所有利益相关者达成共识。咨询委员会是一个由该项目所有利益相关者群体的代表组成的机构。在2013 - 2014学年,该项目的咨询委员会召开了四次会议,作为一个交际焦点小组(CFG)开展工作。会议重点关注:(1)排除相关维度(阻碍变革的因素)和变革维度(克服阻碍的方法);(2)该项目的优势;(3)该项目的劣势以及弥补劣势的具体行动;(4)得出的结论,这些结论随后被纳入大学与塞戈维亚地方当局于2014 - 2018年签署的后续项目合同中。主要结论如下:(1)咨询委员会的建议拓宽了观点范围,有助于研究团队做出关键决策;(2)运用交际方法全面评估该项目并就如何改进达成共识被证明非常有价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验