Huddleston Holly R, Barry Vaughn, Caputo Jennifer L
J Phys Act Health. 2016 Sep;13(9):1010-2. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2015-0719. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
The purpose was to characterize energy expenditure (EE) during academic subjects and activities during an elementary school day.
Children in 2nd to 4th grades (N = 33) wore the SenseWear Armband (SWA) for 5 school days to measure EE. Teachers' logs were compared with SWA data to extract information about EE throughout the day. Energy expenditure was also compared among grades.
After controlling for body mass, grade level was not a significant predictor of average daily caloric expenditure, F (2, 17.58) = .29, P = .75, ω(2) = .05. When comparing activities throughout the day, relative rates of EE differed significantly, Wilks' F (7, 23) = 52.2, P = .00, ηp(2) = .94, with PE and recess having higher EE. When academic subjects were compared (math, science, language arts), relative rate of EE was also significantly different, Wilks' F (2, 30) = 4.31, P = .02, ηp(2) = .22. For the full sample, relative rate EE was higher in science than in language arts.
The school day provides opportunity for EE for children. These data support the potential benefit of active instruction in language arts as a method to increase school day EE.
目的是描述小学一天中各学科及活动期间的能量消耗(EE)情况。
二至四年级的儿童(N = 33)佩戴体动感应臂带(SWA)5个上学日以测量EE。将教师日志与SWA数据进行比较,以提取全天EE的信息。还对各年级的能量消耗进行了比较。
在控制体重后,年级水平并非平均每日热量消耗的显著预测因素,F(2, 17.58) = 0.29,P = 0.75,ω² = 0.05。比较全天的活动时,EE的相对速率差异显著,威尔克斯F(7, 23) = 52.2,P = 0.00,ηp² = 0.94,体育和课间休息时的EE较高。比较各学科(数学、科学、语言艺术)时,EE的相对速率也有显著差异,威尔克斯F(2, 30) = 4.31,P = 0.02,ηp² = 0.22。对于整个样本,科学课的EE相对速率高于语言艺术课。
上学日为儿童提供了能量消耗的机会。这些数据支持了在语言艺术课中采用主动教学法作为增加上学日EE的一种方法的潜在益处。