Said Ian, Böhm Steffen, Beasley Joanne, Ellery Peter, Faruqi Asma Z, Ganesan Raji, Hirschowitz Lynn, Jeetle Sharanpal, Leen Sarah Lam Shang, McCluggage W Glenn, McDermott Jacqueline, Merard Reena, Millner Thomas O, Trevisan Giorgia, Vella Jo, Gilks C Blake, Singh Naveena
Department of Cellular Pathology (I.S., A.Z.F., S.J., S.L.S.L., J.M., T.O.M., N.S.) Department of Medical Oncology (S.B.), Barts Health NHS Trust Department of Pathology (P.E., G.T.), University College Hospital NHS Trust, London Department of Cellular Pathology (J.B., R.G., L.H., R.M., J.V.), Birmingham Women's NHS Trust, Birmingham Department of Pathology (W.G.M.), Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, UK Department of Anatomic Pathology (C.B.G.), Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2017 Mar;36(2):172-179. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000307.
A 3-tier histopathologic scoring system, the chemotherapy response score (CRS), was previously devised for reporting the histologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in interval debulking surgery specimens of stage IIIc/IV tuboovarian high-grade serous carcinoma. This has been shown to predict the outcome and offer additional information to other methods of assessing the treatment response. In the present study, the reproducibility of this scoring system was assessed by determining the interobserver agreement among reporting pathologists. A total of 5 groups each comprising 3 pathologists with different levels of expertise were selected. The participants underwent an online tutorial on how to apply the CRS system. 40 cases (38 cases in 2 appraiser groups) were scored individually by each of the 15 pathologists. The interobserver reproducibility was calculated using Fleiss' κ, Kendall's coefficient of concordance, and the absolute agreement between (a) individual pathologists within 1 group, (b) with the majority score agreement between all groups, and (c) with all individual scores. The CRS system was found to be highly reproducible among all the pathologists' groups (κ=0.761). The agreement in identifying the group of patients with the best response to chemotherapy was exceptionally high (κ=0.926). We conclude that CRS has a high interobserver reproducibility, especially in identifying the subgroup of patients with the best chemotherapy response, justifying its inclusion in clinical trials and reporting practice.
先前设计了一种三层组织病理学评分系统——化疗反应评分(CRS),用于报告Ⅲc/Ⅳ期输卵管卵巢高级别浆液性癌间隔减瘤手术标本对新辅助化疗的组织学反应。已证明该系统可预测预后,并为评估治疗反应的其他方法提供额外信息。在本研究中,通过确定报告病理学家之间的观察者间一致性来评估该评分系统的可重复性。总共选择了5组,每组由3名专业水平不同的病理学家组成。参与者接受了关于如何应用CRS系统的在线教程。15名病理学家分别对40例病例(2个评估组中的38例)进行评分。使用Fleiss'κ、肯德尔和谐系数以及(a)组内个体病理学家之间、(b)所有组之间的多数评分一致性以及(c)所有个体评分之间的绝对一致性来计算观察者间的可重复性。发现CRS系统在所有病理学家组中具有高度可重复性(κ=0.761)。在确定对化疗反应最佳的患者组方面的一致性非常高(κ=0.926)。我们得出结论,CRS具有高度的观察者间可重复性,尤其是在识别化疗反应最佳的患者亚组方面,这证明将其纳入临床试验和报告实践是合理的。