• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[医学检查与健康筛查测量方法的可靠性]

[The Reliability of Measurement Methods for Medical Examinations and Health Screening].

作者信息

Hosogaya Shigemi

出版信息

Rinsho Byori. 2016 Mar;64(3):278-83.

PMID:27363220
Abstract

Clinical laboratory data used in medical examinations and health screening need to have a guaranteed analytical reliability. To ensure the reliability of measurement data, each constituent is required to be compatible with its traceability chain, and any constituent whose traceability chain has yet to be established is required to be appropriately harmonized in the current measurement system. The inter-laboratory reproducibility of standardized measurement values obtained from the external quality assessments conducted by the Japan Medical Association and Japanese Association of Medical Technologists was estimated to evaluate the analytical reliability of clinical tests in Japan. The estimated inter-laboratory reproducibility was then compared with the permissible error limits which have been reported domestically and internationally based on inter- and intra-individual biological variations of healthy subjects. The results showed that most of the measurement uncertainties were sufficiently lower than the permissible limits. This study proposes that the measurement uncertainty of the standardized measurement method has the potential to be a new assessment standard for analytical reliability.

摘要

医学检查和健康筛查中使用的临床实验室数据需要具备有保证的分析可靠性。为确保测量数据的可靠性,要求每个成分与其溯源链兼容,对于任何溯源链尚未建立的成分,要求在当前测量系统中进行适当协调。通过日本医学协会和日本医学技术人员协会进行的外部质量评估获得的标准化测量值的实验室间再现性进行了估计,以评估日本临床检验的分析可靠性。然后将估计的实验室间再现性与基于健康受试者个体间和个体内生物学变异在国内和国际上报告的允许误差限进行比较。结果表明,大多数测量不确定度远低于允许限。本研究提出,标准化测量方法的测量不确定度有可能成为分析可靠性的新评估标准。

相似文献

1
[The Reliability of Measurement Methods for Medical Examinations and Health Screening].[医学检查与健康筛查测量方法的可靠性]
Rinsho Byori. 2016 Mar;64(3):278-83.
2
[Standardization of clinical laboratory data in Japan by the JAMT and JCCLS].日本临床检验标准化协会(JAMT)和日本临床检验标准化委员会(JCCLS)对日本临床实验室数据的标准化
Rinsho Byori. 2009 Jun;57(6):579-83.
3
[Allowable limits of analytical error which can guarantee the reliability of reference intervals for interpretation of clinical laboratory data].[能够保证临床实验室数据解读参考区间可靠性的分析误差允许限度]
Rinsho Byori. 2008 Jul;56(7):617-21.
4
Reproducibility of instrumented knee joint laxity measurement in healthy subjects.健康受试者膝关节松弛度测量仪器的可重复性
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006 May;45(5):595-9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kei243. Epub 2005 Dec 6.
5
The intra- and inter-rater reliability of the tragus wall distance (TWD) measurement in non-pathological participants ages 18-34.18-34 岁非病理性参与者中外耳屏距离(TWD)测量的组内和组间信度。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2013 May;29(4):328-34. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2012.727528. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
6
[Quality assessment scheme required in health checkups and healthcare advice proposed by Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare].
Rinsho Byori. 2009 Sep;57(9):900-2.
7
Defining permissible limits for the combined uncertainty budget in the implementation of metrological traceability.确定计量溯源实施中组合不确定度预算的允许极限。
Clin Biochem. 2018 Jul;57:7-11. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.03.007. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
8
[Quality assurance of analytical methods to guarantee the reliability of medical decision levels for interpretation of clinical laboratory data].[确保临床实验室数据解读中医疗决策水平可靠性的分析方法质量保证]
Rinsho Byori. 2004 Jun;52(6):548-51.
9
Permissible limits for uncertainty of measurement in laboratory medicine.检验医学中测量不确定度的允许限度。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015 Jul;53(8):1161-71. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2014-0874.
10
Simplified approach to uncertainty of measurement in the clinical virology laboratory.临床病毒学实验室测量不确定度的简化方法。
Rev Med Virol. 2018 Nov;28(6):e2006. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2006. Epub 2018 Aug 15.