• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Measuring medical students' empathy using direct verbal expressions.通过直接言语表达来测量医学生的同理心。
Korean J Med Educ. 2016 Sep;28(3):305-13. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2016.35. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
2
Maintaining empathy in medical school: it is possible.在医学院保持同理心:这是可能的。
Med Teach. 2013 Dec;35(12):1002-8. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.802296. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
3
Verbal and non-verbal communication skills including empathy during history taking of undergraduate medical students.医学生问诊时的口头和非口头沟通技巧,包括同理心。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Jul 3;18(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1260-9.
4
"Being-in-role": A teaching innovation to enhance empathic communication skills in medical students.“角色扮演”:一种教学创新,用于提高医学生的同理心沟通技巧。
Med Teach. 2011;33(12):e663-9. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.611193.
5
How well do medical students express empathy?医学生表达同理心的能力如何?
Korean J Med Educ. 2014 Sep;26(3):217-21. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2014.26.3.217. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
6
Do medical students respond empathetically to a virtual patient?医学生对虚拟病人会做出共情反应吗?
Am J Surg. 2007 Jun;193(6):756-60. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.01.021.
7
Teaching communication and compassionate care skills: an innovative curriculum for pre-clerkship medical students.教授沟通和关爱的技能:面向医学预科生的创新性课程。
Med Teach. 2011;33(8):e408-16. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.586748.
8
[Burdened into the job -- final-year students' empathy and burnout].投身工作——最后一年学生的同理心与职业倦怠
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(2):116-24. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2012.02.020. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
9
Differences in Empathy Levels of Medical Students Based on Gender, Year of Medical School and Career Choice.基于性别、医学院就读年份和职业选择的医学生共情水平差异。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2018 Apr;28(4):310-313. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2018.04.310.
10
Correlates and changes in empathy and attitudes toward interprofessional collaboration in osteopathic medical students.整骨医学专业学生共情能力及对跨专业协作态度的相关因素与变化
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2013 Dec;113(12):898-907. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2013.068.

本文引用的文献

1
[Medical students' empathy and its effect on the physicianpatient relationship].[医学生的同理心及其对医患关系的影响]
Korean J Med Educ. 2015 Dec;27(4):283-90. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2015.27.4.283. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
2
Clinician empathy is associated with differences in patient-clinician communication behaviors and higher medication self-efficacy in HIV care.临床医生的同理心与患者-临床医生沟通行为的差异以及艾滋病护理中更高的药物自我效能感相关。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Feb;99(2):220-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.09.001. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
3
Reliability and validity of OSCE checklists used to assess the communication skills of undergraduate medical students: A systematic review.用于评估本科医学生沟通技巧的客观结构化临床考试清单的信度和效度:一项系统评价
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Jun 27. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.06.004.
4
Do patients want doctors to talk about spirituality? A systematic literature review.患者希望医生谈论精神信仰吗?一项系统的文献综述。
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Nov;98(11):1320-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.04.017. Epub 2015 May 19.
5
Eleven Years of Data on the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Medical Student Version (JSE-S): Proxy Norm Data and Tentative Cutoff Scores.关于杰斐逊共情量表 - 医学生版(JSE - S)的十一年数据:替代常模数据和暂定临界分数。
Med Princ Pract. 2015;24(4):344-50. doi: 10.1159/000381954. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
6
The Relationship between Empathy and Medical Education System, Grades, and Personality in Medical College Students and Medical School Students.医科大学生和医学院学生的同理心与医学教育体系、成绩及个性之间的关系。
Korean J Med Educ. 2009 Jun;21(2):117-24. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2009.21.2.117. Epub 2009 Jun 30.
7
How well do medical students express empathy?医学生表达同理心的能力如何?
Korean J Med Educ. 2014 Sep;26(3):217-21. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2014.26.3.217. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
8
Physicians' perspectives on social competency education in academic medicine.医生对医学学术领域社会能力教育的看法。
Korean J Med Educ. 2013 Dec;25(4):289-97. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2013.25.4.289. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
9
Preserving third year medical students' empathy and enhancing self-reflection using small group "virtual hangout" technology.运用小组“虚拟聚会”技术保持三年级医学生的同理心并增强自我反思能力。
Med Teach. 2015;37(6):566-71. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.956057. Epub 2014 Sep 5.
10
Empathy in Korean medical students: Findings from a nationwide survey.韩国医学生的同理心:一项全国性调查的结果。
Med Teach. 2015;37(10):943-8. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.956058. Epub 2014 Sep 3.

通过直接言语表达来测量医学生的同理心。

Measuring medical students' empathy using direct verbal expressions.

作者信息

Hur Yera, Cho A Ra, Kim Sun

机构信息

Department of Medical Education, Konyang University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.

Department of Medical Education, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Med Educ. 2016 Sep;28(3):305-13. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2016.35. Epub 2016 Jun 30.

DOI:10.3946/kjme.2016.35
PMID:27363499
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5016265/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Empathy is an important trait in physicians and a key element in the physician-patient relationship. Accordingly, one of the goals in medical education is developing empathy in students. We attempted to practically assess medical students' empathy through their direct verbal expressions.

METHODS

The medical students' empathy was measured using the modified Pencil-and-Paper Empathy Rating Test by Winefield and Chur-Hansen (2001). The students took 15 minutes or so to complete the scale, and it was then scored by one of two trained evaluators (0 to 4 points for each item, for a total score of 40). The subjects were 605 medical students, and the data were analyzed using descriptive analysis, independent t-test, and one-way analysis of variance in SPSS version 21.0.

RESULTS

The students' empathy scores were low (mean, 12.13; standard deviation, 2.55); their most common responses (78.6%) registered as non-empathetic. Differences in empathy were observed by gender (female students>male students; t=-5.068, p<0.001), school system (medical school>medical college; t=-1.935, p=0.053), and academic level (pre-medical 1 year < other years; t=-4.050, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our findings lead us to the significant conclusion that there is the need for empathy enhancement training programs with practical content.

摘要

目的

同理心是医生的一项重要特质,也是医患关系中的关键要素。因此,医学教育的目标之一是培养学生的同理心。我们试图通过医学生的直接言语表达来切实评估他们的同理心。

方法

采用Winefield和Chur-Hansen(2001年)修订的纸笔式同理心评分测试来测量医学生的同理心。学生们大约花15分钟完成该量表,然后由两名经过培训的评估人员之一进行评分(每项0至4分,总分40分)。研究对象为605名医学生,数据使用SPSS 21.0版本进行描述性分析、独立样本t检验和单因素方差分析。

结果

学生的同理心得分较低(均值为12.13;标准差为2.55);他们最常见的回答(78.6%)显示为缺乏同理心。在同理心方面观察到了性别差异(女生>男生;t=-5.068,p<0.001)、学制差异(医学院>医学专科学校;t=-1.935,p=0.053)和学业水平差异(医学预科1年级<其他年级;t=-4.050,p<0.001)。

结论

我们的研究结果使我们得出一个重要结论,即需要开展具有实际内容的同理心增强培训项目。