• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

教师评价体系对医学院教师教学表现的影响。

Influences of faculty evaluating system on educational performance of medical school faculty.

作者信息

Kim Hong Bin, Myung Sun Jung, Yu Hyeong Gon, Chang Ji Young, Shin Chan Soo

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Office of Medical Education, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Korean J Med Educ. 2016 Sep;28(3):289-94. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2016.34. Epub 2016 Jun 30.

DOI:10.3946/kjme.2016.34
PMID:27363501
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5016264/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The promotion of educators is challenged by the lack of accepted standards to evaluate the quality and impact of educational activities. Traditionally, promotion is related to research productivity. This study developed an evaluation tool for educational performance of medical school faculty using educator portfolios (EPs).

METHODS

Design principles and quantitative items for EPs were developed in a consensus workshop. These principles were tested in a simulation and revised based on feedback. The changes of total educational activities following introduction of the system were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 71% faculty members answered the simulation of the system and the score distributed widely (mean±standard deviation, 65.43±68.64). The introduction of new system significantly increased the total educational activities, especially in assistant professors.

CONCLUSION

The authors offer comprehensive and practical tool for enhancing educational participation of faculty members. Further research for development of qualitative evaluation systems is needed.

摘要

目的

教育工作者的晋升面临挑战,因为缺乏公认的标准来评估教育活动的质量和影响。传统上,晋升与研究生产力相关。本研究开发了一种使用教育工作者档案袋(EP)来评估医学院教师教育绩效的工具。

方法

在一次共识研讨会上制定了EP的设计原则和量化项目。这些原则在一次模拟中进行了测试,并根据反馈进行了修订。分析了该系统引入后教育活动总量的变化。

结果

共有71%的教职员工参与了该系统的模拟,得分分布广泛(均值±标准差,65.43±68.64)。新系统的引入显著增加了教育活动总量,尤其是助理教授的教育活动量。

结论

作者提供了一个全面且实用的工具来提高教职员工的教育参与度。还需要进一步研究开发定性评估系统。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b093/5016264/712f3acc4c84/kjme-2016-34f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b093/5016264/8dcb5318ff2d/kjme-2016-34f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b093/5016264/712f3acc4c84/kjme-2016-34f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b093/5016264/8dcb5318ff2d/kjme-2016-34f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b093/5016264/712f3acc4c84/kjme-2016-34f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Influences of faculty evaluating system on educational performance of medical school faculty.教师评价体系对医学院教师教学表现的影响。
Korean J Med Educ. 2016 Sep;28(3):289-94. doi: 10.3946/kjme.2016.34. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
2
Evaluating the performance of medical educators: a novel analysis tool to demonstrate the quality and impact of educational activities.评估医学教育工作者的表现:一种展示教育活动质量和影响的新型分析工具。
Acad Med. 2009 Jan;84(1):58-66. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31819045e2.
3
Evaluating educators using a novel toolbox: applying rigorous criteria flexibly across institutions.使用新工具包评估教育者:在各机构之间灵活应用严格标准。
Acad Med. 2014 Jul;89(7):1006-11. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000233.
4
Guidelines for evaluating the educational performance of medical school faculty: priming a national conversation.医学教师教育绩效评估指南:引发全国对话。
Teach Learn Med. 2011 Jul-Sep;23(3):285-97. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2011.586936.
5
Criteria of the "educators' pyramid" fulfilled by medical school faculty promoted on a teaching pathway.通过教学途径晋升的医学院教师满足“教育者金字塔”的标准。
Acad Med. 2000 Sep;75(9):954-6. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200009000-00022.
6
Academic competencies for medical faculty.医学教师的学术能力。
Fam Med. 2007 May;39(5):343-50.
7
Scholarly activities recorded in the portfolios of teacher-clinician faculty.教师临床医生教员档案中记录的学术活动。
Acad Med. 2000 Jun;75(6):649-52. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200006000-00018.
8
A review of U.S. Medical schools' promotion standards for educational excellence.美国医学院卓越教育推广标准述评。
Teach Learn Med. 2020 Apr-May;32(2):184-193. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2019.1686983. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
9
Creating a medical education enterprise: leveling the playing fields of medical education vs. medical science research within core missions.创建医学教育事业:在核心使命中平衡医学教育与医学科研的竞争环境。
Med Educ Online. 2017;22(1):1377038. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2017.1377038.
10
Promotion based on teaching efforts requires ongoing documentation of scholarly teaching activities.基于教学工作的晋升需要持续记录学术性教学活动。
Acad Radiol. 2001 Aug;8(8):771-6. doi: 10.1016/S1076-6332(03)80585-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of medical school faculty members' educational performance in Korea in 2022 through analysis of the promotion regulations: a mixed methods study.2022 年韩国通过分析晋升规定评估医学院校教师的教育绩效:混合方法研究。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2023;20:7. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2023.20.7. Epub 2023 Feb 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating educators using a novel toolbox: applying rigorous criteria flexibly across institutions.使用新工具包评估教育者:在各机构之间灵活应用严格标准。
Acad Med. 2014 Jul;89(7):1006-11. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000233.
2
Evaluating the performance of medical educators: a novel analysis tool to demonstrate the quality and impact of educational activities.评估医学教育工作者的表现:一种展示教育活动质量和影响的新型分析工具。
Acad Med. 2009 Jan;84(1):58-66. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31819045e2.
3
Advancing educators and education by defining the components and evidence associated with educational scholarship.
通过定义与教育学术相关的组成部分和证据来推动教育工作者和教育事业的发展。
Med Educ. 2007 Oct;41(10):1002-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02844.x. Epub 2007 Sep 5.
4
The continued evolution of faculty appointment and tenure policies at U.S. medical schools.美国医学院教师聘任和终身教职政策的持续演变。
Acad Med. 2007 Mar;82(3):281-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3180307e87.
5
Documentation systems for educators seeking academic promotion in U.S. medical schools.美国医学院中寻求学术晋升的教育工作者的文档系统。
Acad Med. 2004 Aug;79(8):783-90. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200408000-00014.
6
Results of an academic promotion and career path survey of faculty at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.约翰·霍普金斯大学医学院教员学术晋升与职业发展路径调查结果。
Acad Med. 2004 Mar;79(3):258-64. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200403000-00013.
7
Attitudes of clinical faculty about career progress, career success and recognition, and commitment to academic medicine. Results of a survey.临床教员对职业发展、职业成就与认可,以及对学术医学的投入程度的态度。一项调查结果
Arch Intern Med. 2000 Sep 25;160(17):2625-9. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.17.2625.
8
Integrating clinician-educators into Academic Medical Centers: challenges and potential solutions.将临床教育工作者纳入学术医疗中心:挑战与潜在解决方案
Acad Med. 2000 Sep;75(9):906-12. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200009000-00012.
9
Scholarly activities recorded in the portfolios of teacher-clinician faculty.教师临床医生教员档案中记录的学术活动。
Acad Med. 2000 Jun;75(6):649-52. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200006000-00018.
10
Mission critical--integrating clinician-educators into academic medical centers.关键任务——将临床教育工作者融入学术医疗中心。
N Engl J Med. 1999 Sep 9;341(11):840-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199909093411111.