• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国叶状肿瘤的术后随访实践:一项全国性调查结果

Postoperative follow-up practice of phyllodes tumour in the UK: Results from a national survey.

作者信息

Amer Aimen, Ainley Paul, Thompson Ronald, Mathers Helen

机构信息

The Breast Unit, Altnagelvin Area Hospital, Glenshane Road, Derry, Londonderry, BT47 6SB, UK.

Medical Biology Centre, Queens University Belfast, Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, UK.

出版信息

Surgeon. 2018 Apr;16(2):74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2016.05.003. Epub 2016 Jun 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.surge.2016.05.003
PMID:27363618
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Resected phyllodes tumours (PT) of the breast carry a small but significant risk of recurrence. Nevertheless, there are no national guidelines on the postoperative follow-up of these tumours potentially resulting in a wide variation in practice among breast surgeons in the UK.

METHODS

A web-based questionnaire was sent to breast surgeons across the UK to assess individual follow-up practices including availability of local guidelines, methods of follow-up and influence of risk factors.

RESULTS

Only 38% of 121 responses indicated the availability of local guidelines on PT follow-up. Modal follow-up duration for borderline and malignant disease was 5 years (53.7% and 79.3% of responses respectively), compared to 1 year for benign disease (43%) although 28% of respondents continue to review benign cases for 5 years. Immediate post-operative discharge and self-directed aftercare for benign and borderline cases remains uncommon practice in the UK. Within hospitals represented by more than one respondent in this survey, only around 30% demonstrated consistent practices pertaining to length and frequency of postoperative PT follow-up. Recurrent disease and margin status influenced the follow-up practice of 60% of respondents in our survey. More than 75% indicated that they combine clinical examination with radiological investigations (mammography and/or ultrasound) to follow up PT postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

This survey highlights the wide variation in follow-up practice for resected PT. This may affect the detection of disease relapse or, conversely, result in wasted clinical resources and unnecessary patient distress. Evidence-based national guidelines are necessary to resolve this issue and inform best follow-up practice.

摘要

背景

切除的乳腺叶状肿瘤(PT)有较小但显著的复发风险。然而,目前尚无关于这些肿瘤术后随访的国家指南,这可能导致英国乳腺外科医生的实际操作存在很大差异。

方法

向英国各地的乳腺外科医生发送了一份基于网络的问卷,以评估个人的随访做法,包括当地指南的可用性、随访方法和风险因素的影响。

结果

121份回复中只有38%表明有关于PT随访的当地指南。交界性和恶性疾病的典型随访时长为5年(回复分别占53.7%和79.3%),而良性疾病为1年(43%),不过28%的受访者会对良性病例持续随访5年。在英国,良性和交界性病例术后立即出院并自行进行后续护理的做法并不常见。在本次调查中有多名受访者的医院中,只有约30%在PT术后随访的时长和频率方面做法一致。复发性疾病和切缘状态影响了本次调查中60%受访者的随访做法。超过75%的受访者表示他们会结合临床检查和影像学检查(乳房X线摄影和/或超声)对PT进行术后随访。

结论

本次调查凸显了切除PT术后随访做法存在很大差异。这可能会影响疾病复发的检测,或者相反,导致临床资源浪费和患者不必要的痛苦。需要基于证据的国家指南来解决这一问题并指导最佳随访实践。

相似文献

1
Postoperative follow-up practice of phyllodes tumour in the UK: Results from a national survey.英国叶状肿瘤的术后随访实践:一项全国性调查结果
Surgeon. 2018 Apr;16(2):74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2016.05.003. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
2
Multidisciplinary Management of Phyllodes Tumours and Breast Sarcoma: A Cross-sectional Survey of Clinical Practice across the UK and Ireland.叶状肿瘤和乳腺肉瘤的多学科管理:英国和爱尔兰临床实践的横断面调查。
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2024 Jan;36(1):e31-e39. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2023.10.050. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
3
Recurrent phyllodes tumours of the breast: pathological features and clinical implications.复发性乳腺叶状肿瘤:病理特征及临床意义
ANZ J Surg. 2006 Jun;76(6):476-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03754.x.
4
Phyllodes tumours of the breast: retrospective analysis of a University Hospital's experience.乳腺叶状肿瘤:某大学医院经验的回顾性分析
Malays J Pathol. 2016 Apr;38(1):19-24.
5
Current clinical practice in the management of phyllodes tumors of the breast: an international cross-sectional study among surgeons and oncologists.当前乳腺叶状肿瘤管理的临床实践:外科医生和肿瘤学家的国际横断面研究。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jun;199(2):293-304. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-06896-1. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
6
Follow-up for screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ: results of a survey of UK centres participating in the Sloane project.筛查发现的导管原位癌的随访:参与斯隆项目的英国中心的调查结果
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009 Oct;35(10):1055-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2009.04.002. Epub 2009 May 2.
7
[Cystosarcoma phylloides of the breast. A retrospective analysis of 12 cases].[乳腺叶状囊肉瘤。12例回顾性分析]
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 1996 Jan;56(1):35-40.
8
Phyllodes tumor of the breast: stromal overgrowth and histological classification are useful prognosis-predictive factors for local recurrence in patients with a positive surgical margin.乳腺叶状肿瘤:间质过度生长和组织学分类是手术切缘阳性患者局部复发的有用预后预测因素。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2007 Oct;37(10):730-6. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hym099. Epub 2007 Oct 11.
9
[Phyllodes tumor of the breast: diagnostic and therapeutic problems].[乳腺叶状肿瘤:诊断与治疗问题]
Ann Ital Chir. 1996 Mar-Apr;67(2):219-23.
10
[Analysis of the treatment and prognosis of recurrent breast phyllodes tumor].[复发性乳腺叶状肿瘤的治疗与预后分析]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2009 Jan;31(1):72-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of Benign Phyllodes Tumors: A Dutch Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Between 1989 and 2022.良性叶状肿瘤的管理:1989 年至 2022 年荷兰基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Dec;30(13):8344-8352. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14128-5. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
2
Phyllodes Tumors of the Breast: Addressing the Gaps in Consensus Recommendations for Clinical Management.乳腺叶状肿瘤:填补临床管理共识建议中的空白
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 Oct;30(11):6296-6298. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14147-2. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
3
A deep learning and natural language processing-based system for automatic identification and surveillance of high-risk patients undergoing upper endoscopy: A multicenter study.
一种基于深度学习和自然语言处理的系统,用于对上消化道内镜检查的高危患者进行自动识别和监测:一项多中心研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Oct 31;53:101704. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101704. eCollection 2022 Nov.