Suppr超能文献

系统评价与荟萃分析:左氧氟沙星三联疗法作为幽门螺杆菌感染一线或二线治疗的疗效

Systematic review with meta-analysis: the efficacy of levofloxacin triple therapy as the first- or second-line treatments of Helicobacter pylori infection.

作者信息

Chen P-Y, Wu M-S, Chen C-Y, Bair M-J, Chou C-K, Lin J-T, Liou J-M

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Ditmanson Medication Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chia-Yi, Taiwan.

Departments of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Sep;44(5):427-37. doi: 10.1111/apt.13712. Epub 2016 Jun 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Levofloxacin triple therapy has been used for the first-line and second-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection for more than 10 years.

AIMS

To systematically review the efficacy of levofloxacin triple therapy in the first- and second-line treatment, and to assess the time trend and factors that might affect its efficacy.

METHODS

Prospective trials reporting the efficacy of levofloxacin triple therapy in either the first-line or second-line treatment of H. pylori infection in adults were searched from the PubMed and Cochrane database from January 2000 to September 2015. Meta-analysis was performed to calculate the cumulative eradication rate and the efficacies in subgroups.

RESULTS

Of the 322 articles identified, a total of 4574 patients from 41 trials, including 16 trials in the first-line treatment and 25 trials in the second-line treatment were eligible for analysis. The cumulative eradication rate was 77.3% (95% confidence intervals, CI: 74.7-79.6) and was 80.7% (95% CI 77.1-83.7) in the first-line treatment and 74.5% (95% CI: 70.9-77.8) in the second-line treatment. The efficacies of levofloxacin triple therapy before 2008, between 2009 and 2011, and after 2012 were 77.4%, 79.6% and 74.8% respectively. The eradication rate was higher when levofloxacin was given once daily (80.6%, 95% CI: 77.1-83.7) than twice daily (73.6%, 95% CI: 69.7-77.2). The efficacy was significantly higher in levofloxacin-susceptible strains than resistant strains (81.1% vs. 36.3%, risk ratio 2.18, 95% CI: 1.6-3, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of levofloxacin triple therapy has been lower than 80% in many countries and it is not recommended when the levofloxacin resistance is higher than 5-10%.

摘要

背景

左氧氟沙星三联疗法已用于幽门螺杆菌感染的一线及二线治疗超过10年。

目的

系统评价左氧氟沙星三联疗法在一线和二线治疗中的疗效,并评估其疗效的时间趋势及可能影响疗效的因素。

方法

从2000年1月至2015年9月的PubMed和Cochrane数据库中检索前瞻性试验,这些试验报告了左氧氟沙星三联疗法在成人幽门螺杆菌感染一线或二线治疗中的疗效。进行荟萃分析以计算累积根除率及亚组疗效。

结果

在识别出的322篇文章中,共有来自41项试验的4574例患者符合分析条件,其中一线治疗16项试验,二线治疗25项试验。累积根除率为77.3%(95%置信区间,CI:74.7 - 79.6),一线治疗中为80.7%(95% CI 77.1 - 83.7),二线治疗中为74.5%(95% CI:70.9 - 77.8)。2008年之前、2009年至2011年以及2012年之后左氧氟沙星三联疗法的疗效分别为77.4%、79.6%和74.8%。左氧氟沙星每日给药一次时的根除率(80.6%,95% CI:77.1 - 83.7)高于每日给药两次时(73.6%,95% CI:69.7 - 77.2)。左氧氟沙星敏感菌株的疗效显著高于耐药菌株(81.1%对36.3%,风险比2.18,95% CI:1.6 - 3,P < 0.001)。

结论

在许多国家,左氧氟沙星三联疗法的疗效低于80%,当左氧氟沙星耐药率高于5% - 10%时不推荐使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验