• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[德国劳动年龄男性的就业、家庭与健康:2009 - 2012年德国社会经济面板研究(GEDA)结果]

[Employment, family and health in men of working age in Germany : Results of the GEDA studies 2009-2012].

作者信息

Kroll Lars Eric, Müters Stephan, Rattay Petra, Lampert Thomas

机构信息

FG28 Soziale Determinanten der Gesundheit, Robert Koch-Institut, General-Pape-Str. 62-66, 12101, Berlin, Deutschland.

出版信息

Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2016 Aug;59(8):932-41. doi: 10.1007/s00103-016-2377-9.

DOI:10.1007/s00103-016-2377-9
PMID:27363987
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Today's men want to participate in their children's upbringing more than in the past, but they are heavily involved in their occupation at the same time. This article describes the significance of parenthood, partnership and occupation in relation to health and health behaviours among men of working age in Germany.

DATA

We summarised data from the "German Health Update" (GEDA) studies conducted in 2009, 2010 and 2012. Data on 18,465 men aged 18-64 years were available, 11,429 of which were living with children. We included mental health problems, general health awareness, sports activity and smoking as outcomes.

RESULTS

Full-time employees working more than 48 h per week and unemployed persons had mental health problems more frequently (OR 1.44 and 2.35, p < 0.05) than full-time employees working 48 h or fewer. Similar associations can be shown for health awareness, physical activity and smoking. Concerning partnership and parenthood, the associations were considerably weaker: men living together with children and a partner in the household were overall less burdened and their behaviour was also healthier than single men without children. After simultaneous consideration of employment status, parenthood and partnership, our results show that the unemployed and employees with long working hours were the most burdened.

DISCUSSION

The results provide supporting evidence regarding health problems of men in Germany due to unemployment and long working hours that are of importance for their health whether they are living with a partner and/or with children or not. The association between health and occupation was stronger than between health and fatherhood or partnership.

摘要

背景

如今的男性比过去更想参与孩子的养育,但与此同时他们也全身心投入到工作中。本文描述了为人父母、伴侣关系和职业对于德国工作年龄男性的健康及健康行为的意义。

数据

我们汇总了2009年、2010年和2012年开展的“德国健康更新”(GEDA)研究的数据。可得18465名18至64岁男性的数据,其中11429人与孩子同住。我们将心理健康问题、总体健康意识、体育活动和吸烟作为研究结果。

结果

每周工作超过48小时的全职员工和失业者出现心理健康问题的频率(比值比为1.44和2.35,p<0.05)高于每周工作48小时或更少的全职员工。在健康意识、体育活动和吸烟方面也有类似的关联。关于伴侣关系和为人父母,这种关联要弱得多:与孩子及伴侣同住的男性总体负担较轻,其行为也比没有孩子的单身男性更健康。在同时考虑就业状况、为人父母和伴侣关系后,我们的结果表明,失业者和工作时间长的员工负担最重。

讨论

研究结果为德国男性因失业和长时间工作而出现的健康问题提供了支持性证据,无论他们是否与伴侣和/或孩子同住,这些问题对他们的健康都很重要。健康与职业之间的关联比健康与父亲身份或伴侣关系之间的关联更强。

相似文献

1
[Employment, family and health in men of working age in Germany : Results of the GEDA studies 2009-2012].[德国劳动年龄男性的就业、家庭与健康:2009 - 2012年德国社会经济面板研究(GEDA)结果]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2016 Aug;59(8):932-41. doi: 10.1007/s00103-016-2377-9.
2
[Part-time Work and Men's Health : Results based on Routine Data of a Statutory Health Insurance Scheme].[兼职工作与男性健康:基于法定健康保险计划常规数据的结果]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2016 Aug;59(8):942-9. doi: 10.1007/s00103-016-2378-8.
3
[Health Inequality among employed men and women - results of the German health update (GEDA) 2010].[德国在职男女的健康不平等——2010年德国健康更新调查(GEDA)结果]
Gesundheitswesen. 2013 Apr;75(4):210-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1341446. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
4
[Men's health report - Conclusion and challenges for sex- and gender-sensitive health reporting].[男性健康报告——性别敏感型健康报告的结论与挑战]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2016 Aug;59(8):979-85. doi: 10.1007/s00103-016-2383-y.
5
[Socioeconomic differences in physical activity in the middle-aged working population: The role of education, occupation, and income].中年在职人群身体活动的社会经济差异:教育、职业和收入的作用
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2016 Feb;59(2):188-96. doi: 10.1007/s00103-015-2278-3.
6
[Regional differences in the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in men and women in Germany].[德国男性和女性心血管危险因素患病率的地区差异]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2017 Feb;60(2):151-162. doi: 10.1007/s00103-016-2493-6.
7
[Material deprivation and health among women and men in Germany: results from the German Socioeconomic Panel 2011].德国男女的物质匮乏与健康状况:来自2011年德国社会经济面板调查的结果
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2015 Jan;58(1):100-7. doi: 10.1007/s00103-014-2080-7.
8
Employment stability and mental health in Spain: towards understanding the influence of gender and partner/marital status.西班牙的就业稳定性与心理健康:探究性别和伴侣/婚姻状况的影响
BMC Public Health. 2018 Apr 2;18(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5282-3.
9
Beyond workers' compensation: men's mental health in and out of work.超越工伤保险:工作内外的男性心理健康
Am J Mens Health. 2014 Jan;8(1):45-53. doi: 10.1177/1557988313490786. Epub 2013 May 30.
10
Can gender differences in the prevalence of mental disorders be explained by sociodemographic factors?精神障碍患病率的性别差异能由社会人口学因素解释吗?
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2004 Apr;7(2):133-48. doi: 10.1007/s00737-004-0047-7. Epub 2004 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Partnership, parenthood, employment and self-rated health in Germany and the EU - Results from the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS) 2.德国和欧盟的伙伴关系、为人父母状况、就业及自评健康状况——欧洲健康访谈调查(EHIS)2的结果
J Health Monit. 2019 Dec 11;4(4):7-28. doi: 10.25646/6224. eCollection 2019 Dec.
2
Association of partner, parental, and employment statuses with self-rated health among German women and men.德国男性和女性的伴侣状况、父母状况及就业状况与自评健康的关联。
SSM Popul Health. 2016 May 28;2:390-398. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.05.005. eCollection 2016 Dec.