Lyapina Maya Grigorievna, Dencheva Maria, Krasteva-Panova Assya, Tzekova-Yaneva Mariana, Deliverska Mariela, Kisselova-Yaneva Angelina
Medical University, Sofia, Bulgaria (Faculty of Medicine, Department of Hygiene, Medical Ecology and Nutrition).
Medical University, Sofia, Bulgaria (Faculty of Dental Medicine, Department of Oral and Image Diagnostic).
Med Pr. 2016;67(3):311-20. doi: 10.13075/mp.5893.00106.
A multitude of methacrylic monomers is used in dentistry. Glutaraldehyde (G) is used in dental practice and consumer products as a broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent. The purpose of our study is to evaluate the frequency and the risk of concomitant sensitization to some methacrylic monomers (methyl methacrylate (MMA), triethyleneglycol dimethacrylate (TEGDMA), ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA), 2,2-bis-[4-(2-hydroxy-3-methacrylo-xypropoxy)phenyl]-propane (Bis-GMA), 2-hydroxy-ethyl methacrylate (2-HEMA) and tetrahydrofurfuryl methacrylate (THFMA)) and glutaraldehyde in students of dentistry, students from the dental technician school, dental professionals and dental patients.
A total of 262 participants were included in the study: students of dentistry, students from the dental technician school, dental professionals, and dental patients as a control group. All were patch-tested with methacrylic monomers and glutaraldehyde. The results were subject to the statistical analysis (p < 0.05).
Among the group of dental students, the highest frequency of concomitant sensitization was to TEGDMA and G (15.5%). In the group of patients the highest frequency of concomitant sensitization was to EGDMA and G (16.4%). The frequency of concomitant sensitization among dental professionals was much lower, with the highest rate to TEGDMA and G (7.7%), too. We consider the students from the dental technician school, where the exposure to glutaraldehyde is less likely, to be the group at a lesser risk of concomitant sensitization.
Dental students and dental patients could be outlined as groups at the risk of concomitant sensitization to glutaraldehyde and methacrylic monomers. For dental professionals, we assumed an increased risk for concomitant sensitization to TEGDMA and aldehydes that are commonly used in dentistry. We consider the students from the dental technician school to be the group at a lesser risk of concomitant sensitization to glutaraldehyde and methacrylic monomers. Med Pr 2016;67(3):311-320.
牙科领域使用多种甲基丙烯酸单体。戊二醛(G)作为一种广谱抗菌剂用于牙科实践和消费品中。我们研究的目的是评估牙科专业学生、牙科技师学校学生、牙科专业人员以及牙科患者对某些甲基丙烯酸单体(甲基丙烯酸甲酯(MMA)、三乙二醇二甲基丙烯酸酯(TEGDMA)、乙二醇二甲基丙烯酸酯(EGDMA)、2,2-双-[4-(2-羟基-3-甲基丙烯酰氧基丙氧基)苯基]-丙烷(Bis-GMA)、甲基丙烯酸2-羟乙酯(2-HEMA)和甲基丙烯酸四氢糠酯(THFMA))和戊二醛同时致敏的频率及风险。
共有262名参与者纳入本研究:牙科专业学生、牙科技师学校学生、牙科专业人员以及作为对照组的牙科患者。所有人均用甲基丙烯酸单体和戊二醛进行斑贴试验。结果进行统计学分析(p < 0.05)。
在牙科专业学生组中,同时致敏频率最高的是TEGDMA和G(15.5%)。在患者组中,同时致敏频率最高的是EGDMA和G(16.4%)。牙科专业人员中同时致敏的频率要低得多,同时致敏率最高的也是TEGDMA和G(7.7%)。我们认为牙科技师学校的学生接触戊二醛的可能性较小,是同时致敏风险较低的群体。
牙科专业学生和牙科患者可被视为有同时对戊二醛和甲基丙烯酸单体致敏风险的群体。对于牙科专业人员,我们认为其有增加的同时对牙科常用的TEGDMA和醛类致敏的风险。我们认为牙科技师学校的学生是同时对戊二醛和甲基丙烯酸单体致敏风险较低的群体。《医学实践》2016年;67(3):311 - 320。