• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从相关性到因果关系:历史科学需要什么?

From Correlation to Causation: What Do We Need in the Historical Sciences?

作者信息

Ebach Malte C, Michael Michaelis S

机构信息

Palaeontology, Geobiology and Earth Archives Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia.

School of Humanities and Languages, UNSW, Kensington, NSW, 2052, Australia.

出版信息

Acta Biotheor. 2016 Sep;64(3):241-62. doi: 10.1007/s10441-016-9282-3. Epub 2016 Jun 30.

DOI:10.1007/s10441-016-9282-3
PMID:27364751
Abstract

Changes in the methodology of the historical sciences make them more vulnerable to unjustifiable speculations being passed off as scientific results. The integrity of historical science is in peril due the way speculative and often unexamined causal assumptions are being used to generate data and underpin the identification of correlations in such data. A step toward a solution is to distinguish between plausible and speculative assumptions that facilitate the inference from measured and observed data to causal claims. One way to do that is by comparing these assumptions against a well-attested set of aspects of causation, such as the so-called "Bradford Hill Criteria" (BHC). The BHC do not provide a test for causation or necessary and sufficient conditions for causation but do indicate grounds for further investigation. By revising the BHC to reflect the needs and focus of historical sciences, it will be possible to assess the cogency of methods of investigation. These will be the Historical Sciences Bradford Hill Criteria (HSBHC). An application to one area in historical science is used to demonstrate the effectiveness of the HSBHC, namely biogeography. Four methods are assessed in order to show how the HSBHC can be used to examine the assumptions between our data and the causal biogeographical processes we infer.

摘要

历史科学方法论的变化使其更容易受到被当作科学成果的不合理推测的影响。由于推测性且往往未经检验的因果假设被用于生成数据并支撑此类数据中相关性的识别方式,历史科学的完整性正受到威胁。迈向解决方案的一步是区分合理假设和推测性假设,这些假设有助于从测量和观察到的数据推断因果关系。做到这一点的一种方法是将这些假设与一组经过充分验证的因果关系方面进行比较,比如所谓的“布拉德福德·希尔标准”(BHC)。BHC 并非提供因果关系测试或因果关系的必要充分条件,而是指出进一步调查的依据。通过修订 BHC 以反映历史科学的需求和重点,将有可能评估调查方法的说服力。这些将是历史科学布拉德福德·希尔标准(HSBHC)。在历史科学的一个领域的应用被用来证明 HSBHC 的有效性,即生物地理学。评估了四种方法,以展示 HSBHC 如何用于检验我们的数据与我们推断的因果生物地理过程之间的假设。

相似文献

1
From Correlation to Causation: What Do We Need in the Historical Sciences?从相关性到因果关系:历史科学需要什么?
Acta Biotheor. 2016 Sep;64(3):241-62. doi: 10.1007/s10441-016-9282-3. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
2
Causal criteria and the problem of complex causation.因果标准与复杂因果关系问题。
Med Health Care Philos. 2009 Aug;12(3):333-43. doi: 10.1007/s11019-009-9182-2. Epub 2009 Feb 14.
3
Modernizing the Bradford Hill criteria for assessing causal relationships in observational data.将 Bradford Hill 因果关系评估标准现代化,用于观察性数据。
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2018 Sep;48(8):682-712. doi: 10.1080/10408444.2018.1518404. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
4
The GRADE approach and Bradford Hill's criteria for causation.等级评定方法与布拉德福·希尔因果关系判定标准。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011 May;65(5):392-5. doi: 10.1136/jech.2010.119933. Epub 2010 Oct 14.
5
Strength in causality: discerning causal mechanisms in the sufficient cause model.因果关系的力量:在充分原因模型中辨别因果机制。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2021 Sep;36(9):899-908. doi: 10.1007/s10654-021-00798-6. Epub 2021 Sep 26.
6
A weight of evidence approach to causal inference.一种用于因果推断的证据权重法。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Mar;62(3):270-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.06.013. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
7
Assessing causality in epidemiology: revisiting Bradford Hill to incorporate developments in causal thinking.评估流行病学中的因果关系:重新审视布拉德福·希尔的观点,纳入因果思维的发展。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2021 Sep;36(9):873-887. doi: 10.1007/s10654-020-00703-7. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
8
Causal criteria: time has come for a revision.因果关系标准:是时候修订了。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2019 Jun;34(6):537-541. doi: 10.1007/s10654-018-00479-x. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
9
Applying the Bradford Hill criteria in the 21st century: how data integration has changed causal inference in molecular epidemiology.21世纪应用布拉德福德·希尔标准:数据整合如何改变分子流行病学中的因果推断
Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2015 Sep 30;12:14. doi: 10.1186/s12982-015-0037-4. eCollection 2015.
10
Causality and the interpretation of epidemiologic evidence.因果关系与流行病学证据的解读
Cien Saude Colet. 2007 Mar-Apr;12(2):419-28. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232007000200018.