Talwar Pankaj, Naredi Nikita, Sandeep K, Joneja G S, Duggal B S
Classified Specialist ART Centre, Army Hospital (R&R), New Delhi - 10.
Graded Specialist (Obstetrics & Gynaecology), ART Centre, Army Hospital (R&R), New Delhi - 10.
Med J Armed Forces India. 2011 Oct;67(4):311-4. doi: 10.1016/S0377-1237(11)60074-9. Epub 2011 Oct 22.
Although every step in the in vitro fertilisation (IVF) procedure is important, the impact of embryo transfer (ET) on pregnancy rate (PR) is significant. Of all the crucial aspects of ET the type of catheter used and the technique of transfer on the PR has drawn the maximum attention and controversy. We aimed to compare the outcome of two different ET catheters on the PR.
A prospective analysis comparing the classical Frydman (Laboratoire CCD, France) and the soft Cook (Cook Medical, Indiana, USA) ET catheters was performed. Primary end-point was clinical pregnancy rate (CPR); secondary end-points were rates of difficult transfer. A total of 1,446 ETs were performed in women undergoing IVF treatment, of which 723 cycles were randomised to the Cook catheter and 723 to the Frydman catheter.
It was observed that, although the Cook catheter was related to a slightly higher PR, the overall comparison failed to indicate a significant difference in CPR. It was also seen that the ease of transfer did not significantly affect the PRs.
Individual variables during ET may not contribute significantly to the success of an IVF programme; however, a holistic approach encompassing all the factors is quintessential to improve the PR.
尽管体外受精(IVF)过程中的每一步都很重要,但胚胎移植(ET)对妊娠率(PR)的影响很大。在胚胎移植的所有关键方面中,所使用导管的类型以及移植技术对妊娠率的影响引起了最多的关注和争议。我们旨在比较两种不同胚胎移植导管对妊娠率的影响。
对经典的弗莱德曼导管(法国CCD实验室)和柔软的库克导管(美国印第安纳州库克医疗公司)进行前瞻性分析比较。主要终点是临床妊娠率(CPR);次要终点是困难移植率。共有1446例胚胎移植应用于接受体外受精治疗的女性,其中723个周期随机分配至库克导管组,723个周期随机分配至弗莱德曼导管组。
据观察,尽管库克导管的妊娠率略高,但总体比较未显示临床妊娠率有显著差异。还发现移植的难易程度对妊娠率没有显著影响。
胚胎移植过程中的个体变量可能对体外受精项目的成功没有显著贡献;然而,综合考虑所有因素的整体方法对于提高妊娠率至关重要。