• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多发性硬化症患者对药物治疗偏好的定量分析:一项最佳-最差标度研究。

Quantitative analysis of multiple sclerosis patients' preferences for drug treatment: a best-worst scaling study.

作者信息

Lynd Larry D, Traboulsee Anthony, Marra Carlo A, Mittmann Nicole, Evans Charity, Li Kathy H, Carter Melanie, Hategekimana Celestin

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z3.

Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2016 Jul;9(4):287-96. doi: 10.1177/1756285616648060. Epub 2016 May 15.

DOI:10.1177/1756285616648060
PMID:27366235
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4916526/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

With recent developments in drug therapy for multiple sclerosis (MS), new treatment options have become available presenting patients with complex treatment decisions.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to elicit patients' preferences for different attributes of MS drug therapy.

METHODS

A representative sample of patients with MS across Canada (n=189) participated in a best-worst scaling study to quantify preferences for different attributes of MS drug therapy, including delaying progression, improving symptoms, preventing relapse, minor side effects, rare but serious adverse events (SAEs), and route of administration. Conditional logit models were fitted to estimate the relative importance of each attribute in influencing patients' preferences.

RESULTS

A latent-class analysis revealed heterogeneity of preferences across respondents, with preferences differing across five classes. The most important attributes of drug therapy were the avoidance of SAEs for three classes and the improvement of symptoms for two other classes. Only a smaller group of patients demonstrated a specific preference for avoiding SAEs, and route of administration.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that preferences for drug therapy among patients with MS are different, some of which can be explained by experiences with their disease and treatment. These findings can help to inform the focus of interactions that healthcare practitioners have with patients with MS, as well as further drug development.

摘要

背景

随着多发性硬化症(MS)药物治疗的最新进展,出现了新的治疗选择,这给患者带来了复杂的治疗决策。

目的

本研究的目的是了解患者对MS药物治疗不同属性的偏好。

方法

加拿大各地的189名MS患者代表性样本参与了一项最佳-最差尺度研究,以量化对MS药物治疗不同属性的偏好,包括延缓疾病进展、改善症状、预防复发、轻微副作用、罕见但严重的不良事件(SAEs)以及给药途径。采用条件logit模型估计各属性在影响患者偏好方面的相对重要性。

结果

潜在类别分析揭示了受访者偏好的异质性,在五个类别中偏好各不相同。药物治疗最重要的属性,在三个类别中是避免SAEs,在另外两个类别中是改善症状。只有一小部分患者表现出对避免SAEs和给药途径的特定偏好。

结论

本研究表明,MS患者对药物治疗的偏好各不相同,其中一些可以通过他们的疾病和治疗经历来解释。这些发现有助于为医护人员与MS患者互动的重点以及进一步的药物开发提供信息。

相似文献

1
Quantitative analysis of multiple sclerosis patients' preferences for drug treatment: a best-worst scaling study.多发性硬化症患者对药物治疗偏好的定量分析:一项最佳-最差标度研究。
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2016 Jul;9(4):287-96. doi: 10.1177/1756285616648060. Epub 2016 May 15.
2
Parental preferences for vesicoureteral reflux treatment: Profile case best-worst scaling.父母对膀胱输尿管反流治疗的偏好:案例最佳-最差标度法
J Pediatr Urol. 2021 Feb;17(1):86.e1-86.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2020.11.020. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
3
Comparison of preferences of healthcare professionals and MS patients for attributes of disease-modifying drugs: A best-worst scaling.比较医疗保健专业人员和多发性硬化症患者对疾病修正药物属性的偏好:最佳最差标度法。
Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):171-180. doi: 10.1111/hex.12599. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
4
A community-engaged approach to quantifying caregiver preferences for the benefits and risks of emerging therapies for Duchenne muscular dystrophy.一种社区参与式方法,用于量化护理人员对杜氏肌营养不良症新兴疗法的益处和风险的偏好。
Clin Ther. 2014 May;36(5):624-37. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.04.011.
5
Identification and Prioritization of Important Attributes of Disease-Modifying Drugs in Decision Making among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Nominal Group Technique and Best-Worst Scaling.多发性硬化症患者决策中疾病修饰药物重要属性的识别与优先级确定:名义小组技术与最佳-最差尺度法
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 3;11(11):e0164862. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164862. eCollection 2016.
6
Patient Preferences for Device-Aided Treatments Indicated for Advanced Parkinson Disease.晚期帕金森病适用的器械辅助治疗的患者偏好
Value Health. 2017 Dec;20(10):1383-1393. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.06.001. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
7
PREFERENCES OF PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS FOR ATTRIBUTES OF INJECTABLE MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS TREATMENTS IN THE UNITED KINGDOM AND FRANCE.英国和法国多发性硬化症患者对可注射多发性硬化症治疗属性的偏好。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2018 Jan;34(4):425-433. doi: 10.1017/S0266462318000491.
8
Patient and caregiver preferences for the potential benefits and risks of a seizure forecasting device: A best-worst scaling.患者和照护者对癫痫预测设备潜在获益和风险的偏好:最佳-最差标度法。
Epilepsy Behav. 2019 Jul;96:183-191. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.04.018. Epub 2019 May 29.
9
Preferences for Multiple Sclerosis Treatments: Using a Discrete-Choice Experiment to Examine Differences Across Subgroups of US Patients.多发性硬化症治疗的偏好:使用离散选择实验来检验美国患者亚组之间的差异。
Int J MS Care. 2017 Jul-Aug;19(4):172-183. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2016-039.
10
Societal preferences for rheumatoid arthritis treatments: evidence from a discrete choice experiment.类风湿性关节炎治疗的社会偏好:来自离散选择实验的证据。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015 Oct;54(10):1816-25. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev113. Epub 2015 May 18.

引用本文的文献

1
What matters to patients with multiple sclerosis? Identifying patient-relevant attributes using a ranking exercise with open-ended answers from an online survey in Italy.多发性硬化症患者关心什么?通过对意大利一项在线调查中的开放式回答进行排序练习来确定与患者相关的属性。
BMJ Open. 2025 May 23;15(5):e095552. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-095552.
2
A Best-Worst Scaling Study of the General Population's Preferences for Activities in Living Arrangements for Persons With Dementia.一项针对一般人群在痴呆症患者居住安排中活动偏好的最佳-最差标度研究。
Patient. 2024 Mar;17(2):121-131. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00661-8. Epub 2023 Dec 8.
3
Patient-based benefit-risk assessment of medicines: development, refinement, and validation of a content search strategy to retrieve relevant studies.基于患者的药物获益-风险评估:开发、完善和验证检索相关研究的内容搜索策略。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2022 Apr 1;110(2):185-204. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1306.
4
Preliminary testing of a patient decision aid for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.一种针对复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者的患者决策辅助工具的初步测试。
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2021 Jul 15;7(3):20552173211029966. doi: 10.1177/20552173211029966. eCollection 2021 Jul-Sep.
5
Exploring the Cost Effectiveness of Shared Decision Making for Choosing between Disease-Modifying Drugs for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in the Netherlands: A State Transition Model.探索在荷兰对缓解复发型多发性硬化症的疾病修正药物进行选择时共享决策制定的成本效益:状态转移模型。
Med Decis Making. 2020 Nov;40(8):1003-1019. doi: 10.1177/0272989X20961091.
6
The Impact of Reproductive Issues on Preferences of Women with Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis for Disease-Modifying Treatments.生殖问题对复发型多发性硬化症女性对疾病修正治疗选择的影响。
Patient. 2020 Oct;13(5):583-597. doi: 10.1007/s40271-020-00429-4.
7
Patient and physician preferences for multiple sclerosis treatments in Germany: A discrete-choice experiment study.德国多发性硬化症治疗中患者与医生的偏好:一项离散选择实验研究。
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2020 Mar 8;6(1):2055217320910778. doi: 10.1177/2055217320910778. eCollection 2020 Jan-Mar.
8
Association of Unemployment and Informal Care with Stigma in Multiple Sclerosis: Evidence from the Survey on Living with Neurological Conditions in Canada.加拿大失业及非正式照护与多发性硬化症患者耻辱感的关联:来自加拿大神经系统疾病生活状况调查的证据
Int J MS Care. 2019 Sep-Oct;21(5):214-225. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2017-108.
9
Development and usability testing of a patient decision aid for newly diagnosed relapsing multiple sclerosis patients.新发复发型多发性硬化症患者决策辅助工具的开发与可用性测试
BMC Neurol. 2019 Jul 20;19(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12883-019-1382-7.
10
Perspectives of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis on Drug Treatment: A Qualitative Study.多发性硬化症患者对药物治疗的看法:一项定性研究。
Int J MS Care. 2018 Nov-Dec;20(6):269-277. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2017-109.

本文引用的文献

1
Societal preferences for rheumatoid arthritis treatments: evidence from a discrete choice experiment.类风湿性关节炎治疗的社会偏好:来自离散选择实验的证据。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015 Oct;54(10):1816-25. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev113. Epub 2015 May 18.
2
Patient preferences for attributes of multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapies: development and results of a ratings-based conjoint analysis.多发性硬化症疾病修正疗法属性的患者偏好:基于评分的联合分析的开发与结果
Int J MS Care. 2015 Mar-Apr;17(2):74-82. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2013-053.
3
Sample Size Requirements for Discrete-Choice Experiments in Healthcare: a Practical Guide.医疗保健中离散选择实验的样本量要求:实用指南。
Patient. 2015 Oct;8(5):373-84. doi: 10.1007/s40271-015-0118-z.
4
Oral disease-modifying therapies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.用于复发缓解型多发性硬化症的口服疾病修正疗法。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2015 Jan 1;72(1):25-38. doi: 10.2146/ajhp140023.
5
Patient preferences for disease-modifying drugs in multiple sclerosis therapy: a choice-based conjoint analysis.多发性硬化症治疗中疾病修正药物的患者偏好:基于选择的联合分析。
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2014 Nov;7(6):263-75. doi: 10.1177/1756285614555335.
6
The risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy under biological agents used in the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases.用于治疗慢性炎症性疾病的生物制剂引发进行性多灶性白质脑病的风险。
Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets. 2014;13(2):121-7. doi: 10.2174/1871528113666140224103712.
7
Multiple sclerosis: current and emerging disease-modifying therapies and treatment strategies.多发性硬化症:现有和新兴的疾病修正治疗方法和治疗策略。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2014 Feb;89(2):225-40. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.11.002.
8
Preferences of patients and health professionals for route and frequency of administration of biologic agents in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎治疗中患者及医疗专业人员对生物制剂给药途径和频率的偏好。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2014 Jan 20;8:93-9. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S55156. eCollection 2014.
9
Current and future therapies for multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症的当前及未来疗法
Scientifica (Cairo). 2013;2013:249101. doi: 10.1155/2013/249101. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
10
Oral treatment for multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化的口服治疗。
Lancet Neurol. 2011 Nov;10(11):1026-34. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70228-9.