• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

帽状腱膜下负压引流在慢性硬膜下血肿清除术中的作用。

The role of subgaleal suction drain placement in chronic subdural hematoma evacuation.

作者信息

Yadav Yad Ram, Parihar Vijay, Chourasia Ishwar D, Bajaj Jitin, Namdev Hemant

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, NSCB Medical College, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Department of Neurosurgery, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.

出版信息

Asian J Neurosurg. 2016 Jul-Sep;11(3):214-8. doi: 10.4103/1793-5482.145096.

DOI:10.4103/1793-5482.145096
PMID:27366247
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4849289/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

There is lack of uniformity about the preferred surgical treatment, role of drain, and type of drain among various surgeons in chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH). The present study is aimed to evaluate role of subgaleal drain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective study of 260 patients of CSDH treated surgically. Burr-hole irrigation with and without suction drain was done in 140 and 120 patients, respectively. Out of 120 patients without suction drain 60 each were managed by single and two burr holes. Pre- and postoperative GCS was recorded. Recurrent hematomas, CSDH secondary to tumor, due to intracranial hypotension, coagulopathy, children below 18 years, and patients treated by twist drill craniostomy or craniotomy were excluded. Subgaleal closed-system drainage with low negative pressure was used.

RESULTS

Age of the patients ranged from 18 to 75 years with mean age of 57 years. There were 9, 47, 204 patients in GCS of 3-8, 9-12, and 13-15, respectively. Both the groups were comparable in terms of age, etiology, gender, and neurological status. There was no difference in the mortality in both the group. The recurrence and postoperative pneumocephalus was significantly less in suction drain group as compared to without drain group. There was no infection or any other complication related to suction drainage.

CONCLUSION

Subgaleal closed suction drainage was safe, simple, and effective in the management of CSDH. Recurrence rate was low in the suction drain group.

摘要

引言

在慢性硬膜下血肿(CSDH)的治疗中,不同外科医生对于首选手术方式、引流管的作用及类型缺乏统一认识。本研究旨在评估帽状腱膜下引流管的作用。

材料与方法

这是一项对260例接受手术治疗的CSDH患者的前瞻性研究。分别对140例和120例患者进行了带或不带吸引引流管的钻孔冲洗。在120例未使用吸引引流管的患者中,60例通过单钻孔和双钻孔进行处理。记录术前和术后的格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分。排除复发性血肿、肿瘤继发的CSDH、颅内低压、凝血功能障碍、18岁以下儿童以及采用手摇钻颅骨钻孔术或开颅手术治疗的患者。采用低负压的帽状腱膜下封闭式引流。

结果

患者年龄范围为18至75岁,平均年龄57岁。GCS评分为3 - 8分、9 - 12分和13 - 15分的患者分别有9例、47例和204例。两组在年龄、病因、性别和神经状态方面具有可比性。两组的死亡率无差异。与无引流管组相比,吸引引流管组的复发率和术后气颅明显更低。未发生与吸引引流相关的感染或任何其他并发症。

结论

帽状腱膜下封闭式吸引引流在CSDH的治疗中安全、简单且有效。吸引引流管组的复发率较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a387/4849289/9a28a1ae8504/AJNS-11-214-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a387/4849289/9a28a1ae8504/AJNS-11-214-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a387/4849289/9a28a1ae8504/AJNS-11-214-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The role of subgaleal suction drain placement in chronic subdural hematoma evacuation.帽状腱膜下负压引流在慢性硬膜下血肿清除术中的作用。
Asian J Neurosurg. 2016 Jul-Sep;11(3):214-8. doi: 10.4103/1793-5482.145096.
2
Efficacy of Trauma Catheter and Mushroom Tip Catheter in Evacuation of Chronic Subdural Hematoma and Complications of Drain Placement.创伤导管和蘑菇头导管在慢性硬膜下血肿引流及引流管置入并发症中的疗效
Cureus. 2019 Jul 11;11(7):e5123. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5123.
3
Recurrence Rate of Chronic Subdural Hematoma after Evacuating It by Two Large Burr Holes, Irrigation, and Subgaleal Low-Pressure Suction Drainage.经双大骨瓣钻孔、冲洗及帽状腱膜下低压负压引流治疗慢性硬膜下血肿后的复发率
Asian J Neurosurg. 2019 Jul-Sep;14(3):725-729. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_321_17.
4
Use of twist-drill craniostomy with drain in evacuation of chronic subdural hematomas: independent predictors of recurrence.应用颅骨钻孔引流术治疗慢性硬脑膜下血肿:复发的独立预测因子。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2011 May;153(5):1097-103. doi: 10.1007/s00701-010-0903-3. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
5
Does Drain Position and Duration Influence Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Burr-Hole Evacuation of Chronic Subdural Hematoma? Lessons from a UK Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.引流位置和持续时间是否会影响慢性硬脑膜下血肿颅骨钻孔引流术患者的结局?来自英国多中心前瞻性队列研究的经验教训。
Neurosurgery. 2019 Oct 1;85(4):486-493. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy366.
6
Outcomes of Subdural Versus Subperiosteal Drain After Burr-Hole Evacuation of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Multicenter Cohort Study.颅骨钻孔术后慢性硬脑膜下血肿引流中外膜下与硬脑膜下置管引流的结果:一项多中心队列研究。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Nov;131:e392-e401. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.168. Epub 2019 Jul 30.
7
Comparative Study of Subgaleal and Subdural Closed Drain in Surgically Treated Cases of Chronic Subdural Hematoma.慢性硬膜下血肿手术治疗病例中帽状腱膜下与硬膜下闭式引流的对比研究
Asian J Neurosurg. 2021 Feb 23;16(1):96-98. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_101_20. eCollection 2021 Jan-Mar.
8
Subgaleal drain versus dissection of subgaleal space and closure without drain after burr-hole drainage of chronic subdural hematoma.慢性硬膜下血肿钻孔引流术后,帽状腱膜下置引流管与帽状腱膜下间隙分离不置引流管缝合的比较
Surg Neurol Int. 2024 Aug 16;15:288. doi: 10.25259/SNI_363_2024. eCollection 2024.
9
Outcomes of SUBGALEAL Drain Placement after two Burr-Holes Craniectomy for Chronic Subdural Hematoma.慢性硬膜下血肿双骨瓣开颅术后帽状腱膜下置管引流的效果
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2023 Apr;33(4):460-464. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2023.04.460.
10
Comparison of subgaleal and subdural closed drainage system in the surgical treatment of chronic subdural hematoma.帽状腱膜下与硬膜下闭式引流系统在慢性硬膜下血肿手术治疗中的比较
North Clin Istanb. 2015 Sep 26;2(2):115-121. doi: 10.14744/nci.2015.06977. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Subgaleal/subperiosteal versus subdural drainage for chronic subdural hematoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.慢性硬膜下血肿的帽状腱膜下/骨膜下引流与硬膜下引流:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 May 23;48(1):437. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03596-w.
2
Letter to Editor for "Subgaleal drainage with one burr-hole for chronic subdural hematomas: Our Two-Years' Experience".致《单钻孔硬脑膜下引流治疗慢性硬膜下血肿:我们的两年经验》编辑的信
Brain Spine. 2025 Jan 23;5:104194. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104194. eCollection 2025.
3
Subgaleal drain versus dissection of subgaleal space and closure without drain after burr-hole drainage of chronic subdural hematoma.

本文引用的文献

1
Subdural hematomas: an analysis of 1181 Kashmiri patients.硬膜下血肿:1181 例克什米尔患者的分析。
World Neurosurg. 2012 Jan;77(1):103-10. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.06.012.
2
Subdural drainage versus subperiosteal drainage in burr-hole trepanation for symptomatic chronic subdural hematomas.颅骨钻孔术治疗症状性慢性硬脑膜下血肿时行硬膜下引流与骨膜下引流的比较。
World Neurosurg. 2012 Jan;77(1):111-8. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2011.05.036. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
3
[Epidemiology of chronic subdural hematomas].[慢性硬膜下血肿的流行病学]
慢性硬膜下血肿钻孔引流术后,帽状腱膜下置引流管与帽状腱膜下间隙分离不置引流管缝合的比较
Surg Neurol Int. 2024 Aug 16;15:288. doi: 10.25259/SNI_363_2024. eCollection 2024.
4
Controversies in the Surgical Treatment of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Scoping Review.慢性硬膜下血肿外科治疗的争议:一项系统的范围综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Aug 25;12(9):2060. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12092060.
5
Burr Hole Surgery for Drainage of Chronic and Subacute Subdural Hematomas: Low Recurrence Rate in a Single Surgeon Cohort.慢性和亚急性硬膜下血肿引流的钻孔手术:单名外科医生队列中的低复发率
Cureus. 2021 Nov 5;13(11):e19288. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19288. eCollection 2021 Nov.
6
Comparative Study of Subgaleal and Subdural Closed Drain in Surgically Treated Cases of Chronic Subdural Hematoma.慢性硬膜下血肿手术治疗病例中帽状腱膜下与硬膜下闭式引流的对比研究
Asian J Neurosurg. 2021 Feb 23;16(1):96-98. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_101_20. eCollection 2021 Jan-Mar.
7
Recurrence Rate of Chronic Subdural Hematoma after Evacuating It by Two Large Burr Holes, Irrigation, and Subgaleal Low-Pressure Suction Drainage.经双大骨瓣钻孔、冲洗及帽状腱膜下低压负压引流治疗慢性硬膜下血肿后的复发率
Asian J Neurosurg. 2019 Jul-Sep;14(3):725-729. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_321_17.
8
Management of Subdural Hematomas: Part II. Surgical Management of Subdural Hematomas.硬膜下血肿的管理:第二部分。硬膜下血肿的手术管理。
Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2018 Jul 18;20(8):34. doi: 10.1007/s11940-018-0518-1.
No Shinkei Geka. 2011 Dec;39(12):1149-53.
4
A randomized controlled trial comparing the outcome of burr-hole irrigation with and without drainage in the treatment of chronic subdural hematoma: a preliminary report.一项比较颅骨钻孔冲洗术联合与不联合引流治疗慢性硬脑膜下血肿的随机对照试验:初步报告。
World Neurosurg. 2011 May-Jun;75(5-6):731-6; discussion 620-3. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2010.11.042.
5
Recurrence of chronic subdural haematomata with and without post-operative drainage.
Br J Neurosurg. 2011 Jun;25(3):388-90. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2011.558945. Epub 2011 Apr 18.
6
The role of external drains and peritoneal conduits in the treatment of recurrent chronic subdural hematoma.外置引流管和腹腔引流管在复发性慢性硬脑膜下血肿治疗中的作用。
World Neurosurg. 2010 Jun;73(6):747-50. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2010.03.031.
7
Tension pneumocephalus as complication of burr-hole drainage of chronic subdural hematoma: A case report.张力性气颅作为慢性硬膜下血肿钻孔引流的并发症:一例报告
Surg Neurol Int. 2010 Jul 6;1:27. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.65185.
8
[Chronic subdural hematoma: a review of the literature. Part 1].[慢性硬膜下血肿:文献综述。第1部分]
Ann Acad Med Stetin. 2009;55(2):47-52.
9
The role of drain placement following chronic subdural hematoma evacuation.慢性硬膜下血肿清除术后引流管放置的作用。
Neurosurgery. 2010 Feb;66(2):N15-6. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000367840.82764.3a.
10
Use of drains versus no drains after burr-hole evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma: a randomised controlled trial.慢性硬膜下血肿钻孔引流术后使用引流管与不使用引流管的比较:一项随机对照试验
Lancet. 2009 Sep 26;374(9695):1067-73. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61115-6.