相似文献
1
Digital Methodology to implement the ECOUTER engagement process.实施ECOUTER参与过程的数字方法。
F1000Res. 2016 Jun 9;5:1307. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.8786.2. eCollection 2016.
2
The ECOUTER methodology for stakeholder engagement in translational research.用于转化研究中利益相关者参与的ECOUTER方法。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Apr 4;18(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0167-z.
4
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性：一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
5
Current experience and future potential of facilitating access to digital NHS primary care services in England: the Di-Facto mixed-methods study.当前在英格兰促进获取数字国民保健服务初级保健服务的经验和未来潜力：Di-Facto 混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(32):1-197. doi: 10.3310/JKYT5803.
6
GRADE Concept Paper 1: Validating the "F.A.C.E" instrument using stakeholder perceptions of feasibility, acceptability, cost, and equity in guideline implement.GRADE 概念论文 1：使用利益相关者对指南实施的可行性、可接受性、成本和公平性的看法来验证“F.A.C.E”工具。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Mar;131:133-140. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.11.018. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
8
Development of an evidence-informed implementation strategy for a digital supportive care platform for brain tumour patients, their carers and healthcare professionals.为脑肿瘤患者、其护理人员和医疗保健专业人员开发一个基于证据的数字支持性护理平台实施策略。
Digit Health. 2025 Feb 13;11:20552076251316713. doi: 10.1177/20552076251316713. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
9
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.暑期项目对处境不利或“有风险”的年轻人的影响：一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun.
10
Adapting and Evaluating an AI-Based Chatbot Through Patient and Stakeholder Engagement to Provide Information for Different Health Conditions: Master Protocol for an Adaptive Platform Trial (the MARVIN Chatbots Study).通过患者和利益相关者参与来调整和评估基于人工智能的聊天机器人，以提供针对不同健康状况的信息：适应性平台试验的主方案（MARVIN聊天机器人研究）
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Feb 13;13:e54668. doi: 10.2196/54668.
引用本文的文献
1
Trust, Trustworthiness, and the Future of Medical AI: Outcomes of an Interdisciplinary Expert Workshop.信任、可信度与医学人工智能的未来：跨学科专家研讨会成果
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 2;27:e71236. doi: 10.2196/71236.
2
Risk mapping for better governance in biobanking: the case of biobank.cy.生物样本库更好治理的风险映射：以biobank.cy为例
Front Genet. 2024 Jun 14;15:1397156. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1397156. eCollection 2024.
3
Stuck in translation: Stakeholder perspectives on impediments to responsible digital health.陷入翻译困境：利益相关者对负责任数字健康的障碍的看法
Front Digit Health. 2023 Feb 6;5:1069410. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1069410. eCollection 2023.
4
Considerations for an integrated population health databank in Africa: lessons from global best practices.非洲综合人口健康数据库的考量：全球最佳实践的经验教训
Wellcome Open Res. 2021 Aug 23;6:214. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17000.1. eCollection 2021.
5
Including all voices in international data-sharing governance.纳入所有声音参与国际数据共享治理。
Hum Genomics. 2018 Mar 7;12(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40246-018-0143-9.
6
The ECOUTER methodology for stakeholder engagement in translational research.用于转化研究中利益相关者参与的ECOUTER方法。
BMC Med Ethics. 2017 Apr 4;18(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12910-017-0167-z.
Zotero 插件