Suppr超能文献

传统颈动脉内膜切除术与支架置入术:具有相同易感因素的动脉再狭窄率比较。

Conventional carotid endarterectomy versus stenting: comparison of restenosis rates in arteries with identical predisposing factors.

作者信息

Martelli Eugenio, Patacconi Diego, DE Vivo Gennaro, Ippoliti Arnaldo

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy -

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2016 Aug;57(4):503-9.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to investigate the possible role of individual predisposition in the pathogenesis of carotid restenosis.

METHODS

Over 1700 patients have undergone carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in our institute over the past 15 years. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of those who also had contralateral carotid stenting (CAS) for primary atherosclerotic stenosis and recorded the rates of post-CEA and post-CAS restenosis ≥50%.

RESULTS

In the 29 cases analyzed (21 men/8 women), CEA was performed with conventional technique and direct suturing in most cases. Mean ages at the time of CEA and CAS were 69.2±6.6 and 73±6.7 yrs, respectively, and risk profiles at the 2 time points were similar: hypertension (96.5%), dyslipidemia (55.2%), smoking (51.7%), diabetes (31%), coronary artery disease (48.3%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (37.9%), and chronic renal failure (13.8%). Antiplatelet therapy protocols were identical for the two procedures. During follow-up (mean: 67.25±51.6 months after CEA, 24.6±16.9 months after CAS), Duplex scans revealed restenosis in 12 patients (9 arteries treated with CEA, 6 managed with CAS). In three patients, restenosis was bilateral. Restenosis-free survival rates at five years were 85% after CEA and 66% after CAS (P=NS).

CONCLUSIONS

In this selected group of patients, CEA and CAS were associated with a similar incidence of restenosis. Only 25% of the patients who developed restenosis did so after both procedures. These preliminary findings indicate that individual predisposition does not play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of restenosis. To confirm this conclusion, an analysis of a much larger, multicenter cohort is essential.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨个体易感性在颈动脉再狭窄发病机制中的可能作用。

方法

在过去15年中,我院有超过1700例患者接受了颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)。我们回顾性分析了那些因原发性动脉粥样硬化狭窄而同时接受对侧颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)患者的病历,并记录了CEA术后和CAS术后再狭窄率≥50%的情况。

结果

在分析的29例患者中(21例男性/8例女性),大多数情况下CEA采用传统技术并直接缝合。CEA和CAS时的平均年龄分别为69.2±6.6岁和73±6.7岁,两个时间点的风险特征相似:高血压(96.5%)、血脂异常(55.2%)、吸烟(51.7%)、糖尿病(31%)、冠状动脉疾病(48.3%)、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(37.9%)和慢性肾衰竭(13.8%)。两种手术的抗血小板治疗方案相同。在随访期间(CEA术后平均67.25±51.6个月,CAS术后24.6±16.9个月),双功超声扫描显示12例患者出现再狭窄(9条动脉接受CEA治疗,6条接受CAS治疗)。3例患者为双侧再狭窄。CEA术后5年无再狭窄生存率为85%,CAS术后为66%(P=无显著性差异)。

结论

在这组特定患者中,CEA和CAS的再狭窄发生率相似。发生再狭窄的患者中只有25%在两种手术后均出现再狭窄。这些初步研究结果表明个体易感性在再狭窄发病机制中不起关键作用。为证实这一结论,对更大规模的多中心队列进行分析至关重要。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验