Sena Rodney C, Eldrich Samuel, Pescatore Richard M, Mazzarelli Anthony, Byrne Richard G
Rowan University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Stratford, New Jersey.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, New Jersey.
J Emerg Med. 2016 Sep;51(3):e37-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.05.024. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
Current guidelines for the treatment of adult patients in cardiac arrest are supplied by the American Heart Association through basic life support and advanced cardiovascular life support (ACLS) provider courses. When treatments defined by the ACLS guidelines are unsuccessful in terminating a lethal dysrhythmia, the use of alternative strategies may prove useful. In this case, two defibrillators were used to deliver a greater than normal energy waveform over an extended time interval to return a patient to a normal sinus rhythm.
A 56-year-old woman presented to the emergency department with complaints of chest pain, nausea, and vomiting. The patient's initial work-up, including an electrocardiogram and cardiac troponin, did not show evidence of acute ischemia, and she was admitted to the observation unit for further evaluation. While in the emergency department, the patient developed ventricular fibrillation, and ACLS was initiated. After four unsuccessful defibrillation attempts, a second defibrillator was placed on the patient, and the two were activated almost simultaneously. The patient had immediate return of spontaneous circulation, underwent cardiac catheterization, and was discharged home 1 week later. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: This case shows that dual sequential defibrillation may be a successful method for terminating refractory ventricular fibrillation. Further investigation on cardiac resuscitation should be conducted to standardize the dual sequential defibrillation delivery procedure. Until such guidelines are established, physicians should take this treatment into consideration when standard ACLS measures have failed to successfully terminate refractory ventricular fibrillation.
美国心脏协会通过基础生命支持和高级心血管生命支持(ACLS)提供者课程提供了目前针对心脏骤停成年患者的治疗指南。当ACLS指南所定义的治疗方法未能成功终止致命性心律失常时,采用替代策略可能会有用。在本病例中,使用了两台除颤器在延长的时间间隔内输送高于正常能量的波形,以使患者恢复正常窦性心律。
一名56岁女性因胸痛、恶心和呕吐前往急诊科就诊。患者最初的检查,包括心电图和心肌肌钙蛋白,未显示急性缺血的证据,她被收入观察病房作进一步评估。在急诊科时,患者发生室颤,并启动了ACLS。在4次除颤尝试失败后,给患者放置了第二台除颤器,两台几乎同时启动。患者立即恢复自主循环,接受了心导管检查,并于1周后出院回家。为什么急诊医生应该了解这一点?:本病例表明,双序列除颤可能是终止难治性室颤的一种成功方法。应进一步开展关于心脏复苏的研究,以规范双序列除颤的实施程序。在建立此类指南之前,当标准ACLS措施未能成功终止难治性室颤时,医生应考虑采用这种治疗方法。