Suppr超能文献

患者对全关节置换术捆绑支付价值的认知

Patient Perception of Value in Bundled Payments for Total Joint Arthroplasty.

作者信息

Schwartz Adam J, Fraser James F, Shannon Allison M, Jackson Nikki T, Raghu T S

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona.

W. P. Carey School of Business, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2016 Dec;31(12):2696-2699. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.05.050. Epub 2016 May 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A central concern for providers in a bundled payment model is determining how the bundle is distributed. Prior studies have shown that current reimbursement rates are often not aligned with patients' values. While willingness-to-pay (WTP) surveys are perhaps useful in a fee-for-service arrangement to determine overall reimbursement, the percentage of payment distribution might be as or more important in a bundled payment model.

METHODS

All patients undergoing primary total joint arthroplasty by a single surgeon were offered participation in a preoperative WTP survey. At a minimum 3 months postoperatively, patients were mailed instructions for an online follow-up survey asking how they would allocate a hypothetical bonus payment.

RESULTS

From January through December 2014, 45 patients agreed to participate in the preoperative WTP survey. Twenty patients who were minimum 3 months postoperative also completed the follow-up survey. Patients valued total knee and hip arthroplasty at $28,438 (95% confidence interval [CI]: $20,551-36,324) and $39,479 (95% CI: $27,848-$51,112), respectively. At 3 months postoperatively, patients distributed a hypothetical bonus payment 55.5% to the surgeon (95% CI: 47.8%-63.1%), 38% to the hospital (95% CI: 30.3%-45.7%), and 6.5% (95% CI: -1.2% to 14.2%) to the implant manufacturer (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The data suggest that total joint arthroplasty patients have vastly different perceptions of payment distributions than what actually exists. In contrast to the findings of this study, the true distribution of payments for an episode of care averages 65% to the hospital, 27% to the implant manufacturer, and 8% to the surgeon. While many drivers of payment distribution exist, this study suggests that patients would allocate a larger proportion of a bundled payment to surgeons than is currently disbursed. This finding may also provide a plausible explanation for patients' consistent overestimation of surgeon reimbursements.

摘要

背景

在捆绑支付模式下,医疗服务提供者关注的核心问题是确定捆绑费用如何分配。先前的研究表明,当前的报销费率往往与患者的价值观不一致。虽然意愿支付(WTP)调查在按服务收费安排中可能有助于确定总体报销金额,但在捆绑支付模式中,支付分配的百分比可能同样重要甚至更为重要。

方法

所有接受同一位外科医生进行初次全关节置换术的患者均被邀请参与术前WTP调查。术后至少3个月时,向患者邮寄在线随访调查的说明,询问他们将如何分配一笔假设的奖金支付。

结果

2014年1月至12月,45名患者同意参与术前WTP调查。20名术后至少3个月的患者也完成了随访调查。患者对全膝关节置换术和全髋关节置换术的估值分别为28,438美元(95%置信区间[CI]:20,551 - 36,324美元)和39,479美元(95%CI:27,848 - 51,112美元)。术后3个月时,患者将一笔假设的奖金支付分配给外科医生的比例为55.5%(95%CI:47.8% - 63.1%),分配给医院的比例为38%(95%CI:30.3% - 45.7%),分配给植入物制造商的比例为6.5%(95%CI: - 1.2%至14.2%)(P <.001)。

结论

数据表明,全关节置换术患者对支付分配的看法与实际情况有很大差异。与本研究结果相反,一次护理事件的实际支付分配平均为医院65%、植入物制造商27%、外科医生8%。虽然存在许多支付分配的驱动因素,但本研究表明,患者会将捆绑支付的更大比例分配给外科医生,高于目前的支付比例。这一发现也可能为患者持续高估外科医生报销金额提供一个合理的解释。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验