Fernandez-Moure Joseph S, Van Eps Jeffrey L, Peress Lilia, Cantu Concepcion, Olsen Randall J, Jenkins Leslie, Cabrera Fernando J, Tasciotti Ennio, Weiner Bradley K, Dunkin Brian J
Department of Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, 6565 Fannin St., Suite 1660, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Surgical Advanced Technologies Lab, Department of Nanomedicine, Houston Methodist Research Institute, 6670 Bertner Ave., Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2017 Feb;31(2):852-860. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5043-2. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
Surgical energy has been widely implemented because of ease of use, effective hemostasis, and surgical dissection. Studies demonstrate its use to be an independent risk factor for postoperative wound infection. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is the most common bacteria found in postoperative mesh infection. No reports are available on the sequelae of surgical energy use for open ventral hernia repair (oVHR) with mesh. We hypothesized that increasing amounts of surgical energy will result in higher infectious burden after oVHR with composite multifilament polyester mesh (Parietex™ PCO).
New Zealand rabbits underwent bridging oVHR with Parietex™ PCO and were divided into three surgical treatment groups: (1) scalpel alone, (2) 120 J of energy, and (3) 600 J of energy. The bioprosthesis was then inoculated with 10 colony-forming units of MRSA. Rabbits were survived for 7 days with daily physical examination. Complete blood count, basci metabolic panel, and blood cultures were performed on postoperative days one, four, and seven. Surviving rabbits were killed, and meshes explanted for MRSA colony counts.
Rabbits receiving the most surgical energy developed signs and symptoms of severe sepsis and wound necrosis within 24 h. In comparison, rabbits receiving no surgical energy had significantly less MRSA recovered from explanted mesh, significantly less bacteremia, and fewer adhesions.
Increased use of surgical energy promoted greater colonization, exaggerated septic response to bacterial contamination, and more severe adhesions. In the absence of devitalized tissue, rabbits can effectively limit bacterial contamination. These findings support the surgical principles of proper tissue handling and highlight the detrimental effects of indiscriminant surgical energy usage, thus emphasizing the importance of programs such as Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy.
手术能量因其使用方便、止血有效及能进行手术分离而被广泛应用。研究表明其使用是术后伤口感染的独立危险因素。耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)是术后补片感染中最常见的细菌。目前尚无关于使用手术能量进行开放腹疝修补术(oVHR)并使用补片后的后遗症的报道。我们假设,使用复合多丝聚酯补片(Parietex™ PCO)进行oVHR时,手术能量使用量增加会导致更高的感染负担。
新西兰兔接受使用Parietex™ PCO进行的桥接oVHR,并分为三个手术治疗组:(1)仅用手术刀,(2)120焦耳能量,(3)600焦耳能量。然后在生物补片上接种10个MRSA菌落形成单位。兔子存活7天,每天进行体格检查。在术后第1天、第4天和第7天进行全血细胞计数、基础代谢指标检测和血培养。存活的兔子处死,取出补片进行MRSA菌落计数。
接受最多手术能量的兔子在24小时内出现严重脓毒症和伤口坏死的体征和症状。相比之下,未接受手术能量的兔子从取出的补片中回收的MRSA明显更少,菌血症明显更少,粘连也更少。
手术能量使用增加促进了更多的定植、对细菌污染的脓毒症反应加剧以及更严重的粘连。在没有失活组织的情况下,兔子可以有效限制细菌污染。这些发现支持了正确组织处理的手术原则,并突出了无差别使用手术能量的有害影响,从而强调了诸如手术能量基础使用等项目的重要性。