Luo Lin-Na, He Long-Jun, Gao Xiao-Yan, Huang Xin-Xin, Shan Hong-Bo, Luo Guang-Yu, Li Yin, Lin Shi-Yong, Wang Guo-Bao, Zhang Rong, Xu Guo-Liang, Li Jian-Jun
Department of Endoscopy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.
State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China.
PLoS One. 2016 Jul 7;11(7):e0158373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158373. eCollection 2016.
Treatment options and prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) depend on the primary tumor depth (T-staging) and regional lymph node status (N-staging). Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has emerged as a useful staging tool, but studies regarding its benefits have been variable. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of EUS for detecting preoperative ESCC.
We included in our meta-analysis studies involving EUS-based staging of preoperative ESCC compared with pathological staging. Using a random-effects model, we performed a meta-analysis of the accuracy of EUS by calculating pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity and the diagnostic odds ratio. In addition, we created a summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve.
Forty-four studies (n = 2880) met the inclusion criteria. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of T1 were 77% (95%CI: 73 to 80) and 95% (95%CI: 94 to 96). Among the T1 patients, EUS had a pooled sensitivity in differentiating T1a and T1b of 84% (95%CI: 80 to 88) and 83% (95%CI: 80 to 86), and a specificity of 91% (95%CI: 88 to 94) and 89% (95%CI: 86 to 92). To stage T4, EUS had a pooled sensitivity of 84% (95%CI: 79 to 89) and a specificity of 96% (95%CI: 95 to 97). The overall accuracy of EUS for T-staging was 79% (95%CI: 77 to 80), and for N-staging, 71% (95%CI: 69 to 73).
EUS has good diagnostic accuracy for staging ESCC, which has better performance in T1 sub-staging (T1a and T1b) and advanced disease (T4).
食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)的治疗方案及预后取决于原发肿瘤深度(T分期)和区域淋巴结状态(N分期)。内镜超声(EUS)已成为一种有用的分期工具,但关于其益处的研究结果不一。本研究的目的是评估EUS对术前ESCC的诊断准确性。
我们纳入了涉及术前ESCC基于EUS分期与病理分期比较的研究进行荟萃分析。使用随机效应模型,通过计算敏感性、特异性和诊断比值比的合并估计值,对EUS的准确性进行荟萃分析。此外,我们绘制了汇总的受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线。
44项研究(n = 2880)符合纳入标准。T1期的合并敏感性和特异性分别为77%(95%CI:73至80)和95%(95%CI:94至96)。在T1期患者中,EUS区分T1a和T1b的合并敏感性分别为84%(95%CI:80至88)和83%(95%CI:80至86),特异性分别为91%(95%CI:88至94)和89%(95%CI:86至92)。对于T4期,EUS的合并敏感性为84%(95%CI:79至89),特异性为96%(95%CI:95至97)。EUS进行T分期的总体准确性为79%(95%CI:77至80),N分期的总体准确性为71%(95%CI:69至73)。
EUS对ESCC分期具有良好的诊断准确性,在T1亚分期(T1a和T1b)和晚期疾病(T4)方面表现更佳。