Pramual Pairot, Simwisat Kusumart, Martin Jon
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Mahasarakham University, Kantharawichai District, Maha Sarakham 44150 Thailand.; Email:
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Mahasarakham University, Kantharawichai District, Maha Sarakham 44150 Thailand.; Email: unknown.
Zootaxa. 2016 Jan 28;4072(1):39-60. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.4072.1.2.
Chironomidae are a highly diverse group of insects. Members of this family are often included in programs monitoring the health of freshwater ecosystems. However, a difficulty in morphological identification, particularly of larval stages is the major obstacle to this application. In this study, we tested the efficiency of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) sequences as the DNA barcoding region for species identification of Chironomidae in Thailand. The results revealed 14 species with a high success rate (>90%) for the correct species identification, which suggests the potential usefulness of the technique. However, some morphological species possess high (>3%) intraspecific genetic divergence that suggests these species could be species complexes and need further morphological or cytological examination. Sequence-based species delimitation analyses indicated that most specimens identified as Chironomus kiiensis, Tokunaga 1936, in Japan are conspecific with C. striatipennis, Kieffer 1912, although a small number form a separate cluster. A review of the descriptions of Kiefferulus tainanus (Kieffer 1912) and its junior synonym, K. biroi (Kieffer 1918), following our results, suggests that this synonymy is probably not correct and that K. tainanus occurs in Japan, China and Singapore, while K. biroi occurs in India and Thailand. Our results therefore revealed the usefulness of DNA barcoding for correct species identification of Chironomidae, particularly the immature stages. In addition, DNA barcodes could also uncover hidden diversity that can guide further taxonomic study, and offer a more efficient way to identify species than morphological analysis where large numbers of specimens are involved, provided the identifications of DNA barcodes in the databases are correct. Our studies indicate that this is not the case, and we identify cases of misidentifications for C. flaviplumus, Tokunaga 1940 and K. tainanus.
摇蚊科是一类高度多样化的昆虫。该科成员常被纳入监测淡水生态系统健康状况的项目中。然而,形态学鉴定存在困难,尤其是幼虫阶段的鉴定,这是该应用的主要障碍。在本研究中,我们测试了线粒体细胞色素c氧化酶I(COI)序列作为泰国摇蚊科物种鉴定的DNA条形码区域的效率。结果显示,有14个物种的正确物种鉴定成功率很高(>90%),这表明该技术具有潜在的实用性。然而,一些形态学物种存在较高的(>3%)种内遗传差异,这表明这些物种可能是复合种,需要进一步的形态学或细胞学检查。基于序列的物种界定分析表明,在日本被鉴定为1936年的木氏摇蚊的大多数标本与1912年的条纹摇蚊同种,尽管有少数形成了一个单独的聚类。根据我们的结果,对台南基氏摇蚊(Kieffer 1912)及其次异名比罗基氏摇蚊(Kieffer 1918)的描述进行回顾,表明这种异名关系可能不正确,台南基氏摇蚊分布于日本、中国和新加坡,而比罗基氏摇蚊分布于印度和泰国。因此,我们的结果揭示了DNA条形码在摇蚊科正确物种鉴定中的实用性,特别是在未成熟阶段。此外,DNA条形码还可以揭示隐藏的多样性,从而指导进一步的分类学研究,并且在涉及大量标本时,比形态学分析提供了一种更有效的物种鉴定方法,前提是数据库中DNA条形码的鉴定是正确的。我们的研究表明情况并非如此,并且我们鉴定出了1940年的黄腹摇蚊和台南基氏摇蚊的错误鉴定案例。