• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

放射肿瘤学随机临床试验中主要疗效和毒性终点报告偏倚的患病率及预测因素

Prevalence and predictors of bias in the reporting of primary efficacy and toxicity endpoints in randomized clinical trials of radiation oncology.

作者信息

Tan Teng Hwee, Chen Desiree, Soon Yu Yang, Tey Jeremy Chee Seong

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore.

National University of Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2016 Dec;60(6):764-771. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12494. Epub 2016 Jul 11.

DOI:10.1111/1754-9485.12494
PMID:27396237
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To determine the prevalence and predictors of bias in reporting of primary efficacy and toxicity endpoints in randomized trials (RCTs) of radiation oncology.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE for eligible RCTs published from January 1994 to October 2014. Bias in reporting of primary efficacy endpoint was defined as reporting that treatment was beneficial based on secondary endpoints despite a statistically non-significant difference in primary endpoint. Bias in reporting of toxicity endpoint was defined as not reporting toxicity findings in the abstract, discussion or results table. Logistic regression multivariate models were used to determine predictors of biased reporting.

RESULTS

We found that 13% of 323 RCTs have bias in the reporting of primary efficacy endpoint with non-cooperative group trials as a significant predictor of bias (odds ratio (OR) 2.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-4.00, P = 0.04). Thirty-five per cent of 279 RCTs were judged to have bias in the reporting of toxicity endpoint with trials not listed in Clinicaltrials.gov as a significant predictor of bias (OR 3.23, 95% CI 1.43-7.14, P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of bias in reporting of primary efficacy and toxicity endpoint for radiotherapy RCTs was 13% and 35% respectively. Non-cooperative group trials were more likely to have bias in the reporting of primary efficacy endpoint. Trials not listed in Clinicaltrials.gov were more likely to have bias in the reporting of toxicity endpoint.

摘要

引言

确定放射肿瘤学随机试验(RCT)中主要疗效和毒性终点报告偏差的发生率及预测因素。

方法

我们在MEDLINE中检索了1994年1月至2014年10月发表的符合条件的RCT。主要疗效终点报告偏差定义为尽管主要终点在统计学上无显著差异,但基于次要终点报告治疗有益。毒性终点报告偏差定义为在摘要、讨论或结果表中未报告毒性结果。使用逻辑回归多变量模型确定偏差报告的预测因素。

结果

我们发现,323项RCT中有13%在主要疗效终点报告上存在偏差,非合作组试验是偏差的显著预测因素(优势比(OR)2.04,95%置信区间(CI)1.03 - 4.00,P = 0.04)。279项RCT中有35%被判定在毒性终点报告上存在偏差,未在Clinicaltrials.gov上列出的试验是偏差的显著预测因素(OR 3.23,95% CI 1.43 - 7.14,P = 0.004)。

结论

放射治疗RCT中主要疗效和毒性终点报告偏差的发生率分别为13%和35%。非合作组试验在主要疗效终点报告上更可能存在偏差。未在Clinicaltrials.gov上列出的试验在毒性终点报告上更可能存在偏差。

相似文献

1
Prevalence and predictors of bias in the reporting of primary efficacy and toxicity endpoints in randomized clinical trials of radiation oncology.放射肿瘤学随机临床试验中主要疗效和毒性终点报告偏倚的患病率及预测因素
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2016 Dec;60(6):764-771. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12494. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
2
Quality of head and neck radiotherapy reporting in randomized controlled trials.头颈部放疗报告的质量在随机对照试验中。
Head Neck. 2018 Aug;40(8):1854-1860. doi: 10.1002/hed.25133. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
3
Bias in reporting of randomised clinical trials in oncology.肿瘤学随机临床试验报告中的偏倚。
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Jul;61:29-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.03.066. Epub 2016 May 3.
4
Bias in reporting of end points of efficacy and toxicity in randomized, clinical trials for women with breast cancer.乳腺癌女性随机临床试验中疗效和毒性终点报告的偏倚。
Ann Oncol. 2013 May;24(5):1238-44. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds636. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
5
Reporting of statistically significant results at ClinicalTrials.gov for completed superiority randomized controlled trials.在ClinicalTrials.gov上报告已完成的优效性随机对照试验的具有统计学意义的结果。
BMC Med. 2016 Nov 30;14(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0740-1.
6
No improvement in the reporting of clinical trial subgroup effects in high-impact general medical journals.高影响力的综合医学期刊在临床试验亚组效应报告方面没有改进。
Trials. 2016 Jul 16;17(1):320. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1447-5.
7
Associations between safety, tolerability, and toxicity and the reporting of health-related quality of life in phase III randomized trials in common solid tumors.在常见实体瘤的 III 期随机试验中,安全性、耐受性和毒性与健康相关生活质量报告之间的关系。
Cancer Med. 2020 Nov;9(21):7888-7895. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3390. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
8
Outcome reporting bias in randomized-controlled trials investigating antipsychotic drugs.抗精神病药物随机对照试验中的结局报告偏倚。
Transl Psychiatry. 2017 Sep 12;7(9):e1232. doi: 10.1038/tp.2017.203.
9
Research waste in surgical randomized controlled trials.外科随机对照试验中的研究浪费。
Br J Surg. 2019 Oct;106(11):1464-1471. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11266. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
10
The relationship between study design, results, and reporting of randomized clinical trials of HIV infection.HIV感染随机临床试验的研究设计、结果与报告之间的关系。
Control Clin Trials. 1997 Oct;18(5):431-44. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(97)00097-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of radiotherapy reporting in randomized controlled trials of prostate cancer.前列腺癌随机对照试验中放疗报告的质量。
Radiat Oncol. 2018 Jun 7;13(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13014-018-1053-7.