Toska Elona, Gittings Lesley, Hodes Rebecca, Cluver Lucie D, Govender Kaymarlin, Chademana K Emma, Gutiérrez Vincent Evans
a AIDS and Society Research Unit, Centre for Social Science Research , University of Cape Town , Cape Town , South Africa.
b Centre for Evidence-Based Intervention, Department of Social Policy & Intervention , University of Oxford Barnett House , Oxford , UK.
Afr J AIDS Res. 2016 Jul;15(2):123-40. doi: 10.2989/16085906.2016.1194299.
Adolescents are the only age group with growing AIDS-related morbidity and mortality in Eastern and Southern Africa, making HIV prevention research among this population an urgent priority. Structural deprivations are key drivers of adolescent HIV infection in this region. Biomedical interventions must be combined with behavioural and social interventions to alleviate the socio-structural determinants of HIV infection. There is growing evidence that social protection has the potential to reduce the risk of HIV infection among children and adolescents. This research combined expert consultations with a rigorous review of academic and policy literature on the effectiveness of social protection for HIV prevention among children and adolescents, including prevention for those already HIV-positive. The study had three goals: (i) assess the evidence on the effectiveness of social protection for HIV prevention, (ii) consider key challenges to implementing social protection programmes that promote HIV prevention, and (iii) identify critical research gaps in social protection and HIV prevention, in Eastern and Southern Africa. Causal pathways of inequality, poverty, gender and HIV risk require flexible and responsive social protection mechanisms. Results confirmed that HIV-inclusive child-and adolescent-sensitive social protection has the potential to interrupt risk pathways to HIV infection and foster resilience. In particular, empirical evidence (literature and expert feedback) detailed the effectiveness of combination social protection particularly cash/in-kind components combined with "care" and "capability" among children and adolescents. Social protection programmes should be dynamic and flexible, and consider age, gender, HIV-related stigma, and context, including cultural norms, which offer opportunities to improve programmatic coverage, reach and uptake. Effective HIV prevention also requires integrated social protection policies, developed through strong national government ownership and leadership. Future research should explore which combinations of social protection work for sub-groups of children and adolescents, particularly those living with HIV.
在东非和南部非洲,青少年是唯一与艾滋病相关发病率和死亡率不断上升的年龄组,因此在这一人群中开展艾滋病毒预防研究成为当务之急。结构性贫困是该地区青少年感染艾滋病毒的主要驱动因素。生物医学干预措施必须与行为和社会干预措施相结合,以减轻艾滋病毒感染的社会结构决定因素。越来越多的证据表明,社会保护有潜力降低儿童和青少年感染艾滋病毒的风险。本研究结合了专家咨询,并对有关社会保护对儿童和青少年预防艾滋病毒有效性的学术和政策文献进行了严格审查,包括对已感染艾滋病毒者的预防。该研究有三个目标:(i)评估社会保护对艾滋病毒预防有效性的证据;(ii)考虑实施促进艾滋病毒预防的社会保护方案的关键挑战;(iii)确定东非和南部非洲社会保护与艾滋病毒预防方面的关键研究差距。不平等、贫困、性别和艾滋病毒风险的因果途径需要灵活且有针对性的社会保护机制。结果证实,涵盖艾滋病毒的对儿童和青少年敏感的社会保护有潜力中断艾滋病毒感染的风险途径并增强复原力。特别是,实证证据(文献和专家反馈)详细说明了综合社会保护的有效性,尤其是现金/实物部分与儿童和青少年中的“关爱”和“能力培养”相结合的情况。社会保护方案应具有动态性和灵活性,并考虑年龄、性别、与艾滋病毒相关的耻辱感以及背景情况,包括文化规范,这些因素为提高方案覆盖范围、触及范围和接受程度提供了机会。有效的艾滋病毒预防还需要通过强大的国家政府主导和领导制定综合社会保护政策。未来的研究应探索哪些社会保护组合对儿童和青少年亚群体有效,特别是那些艾滋病毒感染者。