Kramer M S, Lane D A, Mills E L
Department of Pediatrics, McGill University Faculty of Medicine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Pediatrics. 1989 Jul;84(1):18-27.
The technique of decision analysis was used to compare the benefits (prevention of major infectious sequelae of bacteremia) and risks (unnecessary hospitalization and intravenous antibiotic treatment of children whose bacteremia would have resolved spontaneously, discomfort of venipuncture) of alternative diagnostic management strategies in the evaluation of children 3 to 24 months of age with fever (rectal temperature greater than or equal to 39 degrees C) of acute (less than or equal to 4 days) onset and without evident focus of bacterial infection. The diagnostic strategies compared at the initial visit were blood culture in all, blood culture in none, and selective blood culture (restricted to children judged to be at high risk). Probability estimates were based on published epidemiologic studies and case series, and utilities were elicited from mothers of 3- to 24-month-old children and from pediatricians. Based on initial probabilities and utilities, the "no blood culture" strategy had the highest expected utility, followed closely by the "selective blood culture" strategy, with the "blood culture all" strategy a distant third. Sensitivity analyses based on increased risk of major infectious sequelae or of bacteremia had no effect on the ranking of the three initial management options. Eliminating the "disutility" of venipuncture or augmenting the disutility of major infectious sequelae also failed to alter the ranking. Even when an extreme relative disutility for major sequelae was assumed, the "blood culture all" strategy was not favored. Thus, the risk of unnecessary hospitalization and intravenous antibiotic treatment of the relatively large number of children whose bacteremia spontaneously resolves appears to outweigh the benefit of preventing serious infectious sequelae in the few children in whom positive blood culture results permit timely intervention. The explicitness and coherence of the decision analysis approach should help in developing a rational diagnostic approach to the young febrile child.
决策分析技术用于比较不同诊断管理策略在评估3至24个月急性(≤4天)发热(直肠温度≥39摄氏度)且无明显细菌感染病灶儿童时的益处(预防菌血症的主要感染后遗症)和风险(不必要的住院治疗以及对菌血症本可自发缓解的儿童进行静脉抗生素治疗、静脉穿刺不适)。在初次就诊时比较的诊断策略包括对所有儿童进行血培养、不对任何儿童进行血培养以及选择性血培养(仅限于被判定为高危的儿童)。概率估计基于已发表的流行病学研究和病例系列,效用值则是从3至24个月儿童的母亲以及儿科医生处获取。基于初始概率和效用值,“不进行血培养”策略的预期效用最高,紧随其后的是“选择性血培养”策略,“对所有儿童进行血培养”策略则远落后于前两者位列第三。基于主要感染后遗症或菌血症风险增加所进行的敏感性分析,对三种初始管理方案的排名没有影响。消除静脉穿刺的“负效用”或增加主要感染后遗症的负效用也未能改变排名。即便假设主要后遗症存在极高的相对负效用,“对所有儿童进行血培养”策略也不受青睐。因此,对于大量菌血症可自发缓解的儿童而言,不必要的住院治疗和静脉抗生素治疗的风险似乎超过了在少数血培养结果呈阳性从而得以及时干预的儿童中预防严重感染后遗症的益处。决策分析方法的明确性和连贯性应有助于制定针对发热幼儿的合理诊断方法。