Shah Manish A, Cho Jae-Yong, Tan Iain B, Tebbutt Niall C, Yen Chia-Jui, Kang Alice, Shames David S, Bu Lilian, Kang Yoon-Koo
Weill Cornell Medicine Center for Advanced Digestive Care, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
Severance Hospital (Gangnam), Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Oncologist. 2016 Sep;21(9):1085-90. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0038. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
The phase II YO28252 study (NCT01590719) examined first-line onartuzumab plus mFOLFOX6 in patients with metastatic, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. MET immunohistochemistry expression as a biomarker of onartuzumab activity was also examined.
Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive standard mFOLFOX6 plus onartuzumab (10 mg/kg) or placebo in 2-week cycles for 12 cycles, followed by onartuzumab or placebo until disease progression. Coprimary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) in intent-to-treat (ITT) and MET-positive populations. The target hazard ratio (HR) was 0.70 for patients in the ITT group and 0.60 in the MET-positive population. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and safety.
Overall, 123 patients were enrolled (n = 62 onartuzumab, n = 61 placebo). Median PFS was 6.77 versus 6.97 months for onartuzumab versus placebo, respectively (HR, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-1.63; p = .71). In the MET-positive population, median PFS was 5.95 versus 6.80 months, onartuzumab versus placebo (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.60-3.20; p = .45). Median OS was 10.61 months for onartuzumab versus 11.27 months for placebo) (HR, 1.06, 0.64-1.75; p = .83). In the MET-positive population, median OS was 8.51 versus 8.48 months for onartuzumab versus placebo, respectively (HR, 1.12, 95% CI, 0.45-2.78; p = .80). ORR was 60.5% for the onartuzumab group and 57.1% for placebo. Grade 3-5 adverse events (AEs) were seen in 88.3% of patients receiving onartuzumab and in 78.3% of patients receiving placebo, with serious AEs in 55% and 40%, respectively.
The addition of onartuzumab to mFOLFOX6 in gastric cancer did not improve efficacy in an unselected population or in a MET immunohistochemistry-positive population.
The YO28252 study demonstrated that the addition of the anti-MET agent onartuzumab to mFOLFOX6 for treatment of gastric cancer did not improve efficacy in an overall study population or those selected for positive MET status by immunohistochemistry. This highlights the importance of correctly selecting biomarkers for targeted therapies. A multivariate analysis suggested that MET positivity may still be prognostic for worse median overall survival in gastric cancer; therefore, it is important to continue investigation into the optimal approach to inhibit MET signaling in gastric cancer.
II期YO28252研究(NCT01590719)评估了一线应用奥那珠单抗联合改良FOLFOX6方案治疗转移性人表皮生长因子受体2阴性胃或胃食管交界腺癌患者的疗效。同时也检测了MET免疫组化表达作为奥那珠单抗活性生物标志物的情况。
患者按1:1随机分组,接受标准的FOLFOX6联合奥那珠单抗(10mg/kg)或安慰剂,每2周为1个周期,共12个周期,之后继续接受奥那珠单抗或安慰剂治疗直至疾病进展。共同主要终点为意向性治疗(ITT)人群和MET阳性人群的无进展生存期(PFS)。ITT组患者的目标风险比(HR)为0.70,MET阳性人群为0.60。次要终点为总生存期(OS)、总缓解率(ORR)和安全性。
共纳入123例患者(奥那珠单抗组62例,安慰剂组61例)。奥那珠单抗组和安慰剂组的中位PFS分别为6.77个月和6.97个月(HR = 1.08;95%置信区间[CI]:0.71 - 1.63;p = 0.71)。在MET阳性人群中,奥那珠单抗组和安慰剂组的中位PFS分别为5.95个月和6.80个月(HR = 1.38;95%CI:0.60 - 3.20;p = 0.45)。奥那珠单抗组和安慰剂组的中位OS分别为10.61个月和11.27个月(HR = 1.06,95%CI:0.64 - 1.75;p = 0.83)。在MET阳性人群中,奥那珠单抗组和安慰剂组的中位OS分别为8.51个月和8.48个月(HR = 1.12,95%CI:0.45 - 2.78;p = 0.80)。奥那珠单抗组的ORR为60.5%,安慰剂组为57.1%。接受奥那珠单抗治疗的患者中88.3%发生3 - 5级不良事件(AE),接受安慰剂治疗的患者中这一比例为78.3%,严重AE的发生率分别为55%和40%。
在胃癌患者中,FOLFOX6方案联合奥那珠单抗治疗并未改善未选择人群或MET免疫组化阳性人群的疗效。
YO28252研究表明,在治疗胃癌时,FOLFOX6方案联合抗MET药物奥那珠单抗并未改善总体研究人群或通过免疫组化选择的MET阳性人群的疗效。这凸显了正确选择靶向治疗生物标志物的重要性。多因素分析提示,MET阳性可能仍然是胃癌患者总生存期较差的预后因素;因此,继续研究抑制胃癌中MET信号传导的最佳方法非常重要。