Catenacci Daniel V T, Tebbutt Niall C, Davidenko Irina, Murad André M, Al-Batran Salah-Eddin, Ilson David H, Tjulandin Sergei, Gotovkin Evengy, Karaszewska Boguslawa, Bondarenko Igor, Tejani Mohamedtaki A, Udrea Anghel A, Tehfe Mustapha, De Vita Ferdinando, Turkington Cheryl, Tang Rui, Ang Agnes, Zhang Yilong, Hoang Tien, Sidhu Roger, Cunningham David
University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Nov;18(11):1467-1482. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30566-1. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
Rilotumumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that selectively targets the ligand of the MET receptor, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). We aimed to assess the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of rilotumumab combined with epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine, and to assess potential biomarkers, in patients with advanced MET-positive gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.
This multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study was done at 152 centres in 27 countries. We recruited adults (aged ≥18 years) with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, MET-positive tumours (≥25% of tumour cells with membrane staining of ≥1+ staining intensity), and evaluable disease, who had not received previous systemic therapy. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via a computerised voice response system to receive rilotumumab 15 mg/kg intravenously or placebo in combination with open-label chemotherapy (epirubicin 50 mg/m intravenously; cisplatin 60 mg/m intravenously; capecitabine 625 mg/m orally twice daily) in 21-day cycles for up to ten cycles. After completion of chemotherapy, patients continued to receive rilotumumab or placebo monotherapy until disease progression, intolerability, withdrawal of consent, or study termination. Randomisation was stratified by disease extent and ECOG performance status. Both patients and physicians were masked to study treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was overall survival, analysed by intention to treat. We report the final analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01697072.
Between Nov 7, 2012, and Nov 21, 2014, 609 patients were randomly assigned to rilotumumab plus epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine (rilotumumab group; n=304) or placebo plus epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine (placebo group; n=305). Study treatment was stopped early after an independent data monitoring committee found a higher number of deaths in the rilotumumab group than in the placebo group; all patients in the rilotumumab group subsequently discontinued all study treatment. Median follow-up was 7·7 months (IQR 3·6-12·0) for patients in the rilotumumab group and 9·4 months (5·3-13·1) for patients in the placebo group. Median overall survival was 8·8 months (95% CI 7·7-10·2) in the rilotumumab group compared with 10·7 months (9·6-12·4) in the placebo group (stratified hazard ratio 1·34, 95% CI 1·10-1·63; p=0·003). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events in the rilotumumab and placebo groups were neutropenia (86 [29%] of 298 patients vs 97 [32%] of 299 patients), anaemia (37 [12%] vs 43 [14%]), and fatigue (30 [10%] vs 35 [12%]). The frequency of serious adverse events was similar in the rilotumumab and placebo groups (142 [48%] vs 149 [50%]). More deaths due to adverse events occurred in the rilotumumab group than the placebo group (42 [14%] vs 31 [10%]). In the rilotumumab group, 33 (11%) of 298 patients had fatal adverse events due to disease progression, and nine (3%) had fatal events not due to disease progression. In the placebo group, 23 (8%) of 299 patients had fatal adverse events due to disease progression, and eight (3%) had fatal events not due to disease progression.
Ligand-blocking inhibition of the MET pathway with rilotumumab is not effective in improving clinical outcomes in patients with MET-positive gastric or gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma.
Amgen.
瑞罗西单抗是一种全人源单克隆抗体,可选择性靶向MET受体的配体肝细胞生长因子(HGF)。我们旨在评估瑞罗西单抗联合表柔比星、顺铂和卡培他滨在晚期MET阳性胃癌或胃食管交界腺癌患者中的疗效、安全性和药代动力学,并评估潜在的生物标志物。
这项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的3期研究在27个国家的152个中心进行。我们招募了年龄≥18岁、不可切除的局部晚期或转移性胃癌或胃食管交界腺癌患者,东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态为0或1,MET阳性肿瘤(≥25%的肿瘤细胞膜染色强度≥1+),且疾病可评估,此前未接受过全身治疗。符合条件的患者通过计算机语音应答系统随机分配(1:1),接受静脉注射15mg/kg瑞罗西单抗或安慰剂,联合开放标签化疗(表柔比星50mg/m²静脉注射;顺铂60mg/m²静脉注射;卡培他滨625mg/m²口服,每日两次),每21天为一个周期,最多十个周期。化疗完成后,患者继续接受瑞罗西单抗或安慰剂单药治疗,直至疾病进展、出现不耐受、撤回同意或研究终止。随机分组按疾病范围和ECOG体能状态分层。患者和医生均对研究治疗分配不知情。主要终点为总生存期,采用意向性分析。我们报告最终分析结果。本研究已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,编号为NCT01697072。
2012年11月7日至2014年11月21日期间,609例患者被随机分配至瑞罗西单抗联合表柔比星、顺铂和卡培他滨组(瑞罗西单抗组;n = 304)或安慰剂联合表柔比星、顺铂和卡培他滨组(安慰剂组;n = 305)。在独立数据监测委员会发现瑞罗西单抗组死亡人数高于安慰剂组后,研究治疗提前终止;瑞罗西单抗组的所有患者随后均停止了所有研究治疗。瑞罗西单抗组患者的中位随访时间为7.7个月(IQR 3.6 - 12.0),安慰剂组患者为9.4个月(5.3 - 13.1)。瑞罗西单抗组的中位总生存期为8.8个月(95%CI 7.7 - 10.2),而安慰剂组为10.7个月(9.6 - 12.4)(分层风险比为'1.34',95%CI 1.10 - 1.63;p = 0.003)。瑞罗西单抗组和安慰剂组最常见的3级或更严重不良事件为中性粒细胞减少(298例患者中的86例[29%] vs 299例患者中的97例[32%])、贫血(37例[12%] vs 43例[14%])和疲劳(30例[10%] vs 35例[12%])。严重不良事件的发生率在瑞罗西单抗组和安慰剂组相似(142例[48%] vs 149例[50%])。瑞罗西单抗组因不良事件导致的死亡人数多于安慰剂组(42例[14%] vs 31例[10%])。在瑞罗西单抗组中,298例患者中有33例(11%)因疾病进展发生致命不良事件,9例(3%)发生非疾病进展导致的致命事件。在安慰剂组中,299例患者中有23例(8%)因疾病进展发生致命不良事件, 8例(3%)发生非疾病进展导致的致命事件。
用瑞罗西单抗对MET通路进行配体阻断抑制,对改善MET阳性胃癌或胃食管腺癌患者临床结局无效。
安进公司。