Rahimi Salma, Jeppson Peter C, Gattoc Leda, Westermann Lauren, Cichowski Sara, Raker Chris, Weber LeBrun Emily, Sung Vivian
From the *Obstetrics and Gynecology, South Nassau Communities Hospital, Oceanside; and Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; †Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque NM; ‡Obstetrics and Gynecology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA; §Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lancaster General Health, Lancaster, PA; ∥Division of Research, Women and Infants' Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI; ¶Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL; and #Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Infants' Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI.
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2016 Sep-Oct;22(5):364-8. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000292.
The aim of this study was to compare perioperative complications by route of hysterectomy before and after the introduction of robotic surgery.
This is an ancillary analysis of a multicenter, retrospective cohort study with historical controls through the Fellows' Pelvic Research Network. Hysterectomies performed for benign conditions were collected prior to introduction of the robot (prerobot) and the year after introduction of the robot (postrobot) at each institution. To obtain a representative annual case distribution for each institution, a maximum of 20 cases per month were selected using stratified random sampling. Patient demographics and intraoperative and postoperative complication data were collected.
One thousand four hundred forty cases were included in this study, 732 in the prerobot and 708 in the postrobot period. Intraoperative complications in the prerobot group were highest in the abdominal group (7.4%) followed by vaginal (3.9%) and laparoscopic (3.7%) groups. Postoperative complications were higher in the vaginal (8.3%) and abdominal (7.4%) groups compared with laparoscopic (1.8%) groups (P = 0.03), because of a higher proportion of infections. In the postrobot period, intraoperative complications were lower in the vaginal (2.8%), robotic (3%), and laparoscopic (4.6%) groups compared with abdominal (10.8%) (P = 0.04). Postoperative complications were lowest in the vaginal (5.1%), laparoscopic (3.6%), and robotic (3%) approaches compared with the abdominal (13.9%) approach (P = 0.003).
Vaginal hysterectomy has comparable rates of perioperative complications when compared with robotic and laparoscopic approaches and should be considered as a primary surgical approach in the growing armamentarium of minimally invasive approaches for hysterectomy for benign conditions.
本研究旨在比较机器人手术引入前后子宫切除术不同术式的围手术期并发症。
这是一项通过住院医师盆腔研究网络进行的多中心回顾性队列研究的辅助分析,采用历史对照。在每个机构收集机器人手术引入前(机器人手术前)和引入后一年(机器人手术后)因良性疾病进行的子宫切除术。为获得每个机构具有代表性的年度病例分布,每月最多选取20例病例,采用分层随机抽样。收集患者人口统计学资料以及术中、术后并发症数据。
本研究共纳入1440例病例,机器人手术前732例,机器人手术后708例。机器人手术前组中,腹部手术组的术中并发症最高(7.4%),其次是阴道手术组(3.9%)和腹腔镜手术组(3.7%)。阴道手术组(8.3%)和腹部手术组(7.4%)的术后并发症高于腹腔镜手术组(1.8%)(P = 0.03),原因是感染比例较高。在机器人手术后时期,阴道手术组(2.8%)、机器人手术组(3%)和腹腔镜手术组(4.6%)的术中并发症低于腹部手术组(10.8%)(P = 0.04)。阴道手术(5.1%)、腹腔镜手术(3.6%)和机器人手术(3%)入路的术后并发症低于腹部手术(13.9%)入路(P = 0.003)。
与机器人手术和腹腔镜手术入路相比,阴道子宫切除术的围手术期并发症发生率相当,在日益增多的良性疾病子宫切除微创术式中,应将其视为主要手术入路。