• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项基于瑞典人群的良性子宫切除术评估,比较微创和开腹手术。

A Swedish population-based evaluation of benign hysterectomy, comparing minimally invasive and abdominal surgery.

作者信息

Billfeldt Nina K, Borgfeldt Christer, Lindkvist Håkan, Stjerndahl Jan-Henrik, Ankardal Maud

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Regional Hospital of Halland, Halmstad, Sweden.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Mar;222:113-118. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.01.019. Epub 2018 Feb 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.01.019
PMID:29408741
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to evaluate surgical routes for benign hysterectomy in a Swedish population, including abdominal and minimally invasive surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospectively collected data from the Swedish National GynOp Registry 2009-2015: 13 806 hysterectomy cases were included: abdominal (AH, n = 7485), vaginal (VH, n = 3767), conventional laparoscopic (LH, n = 1539) and robotically-assisted (RAH, n = 1015).

RESULTS

The VH group had the shortest operation time at 75 min, AH 97 min and RAH 104 min. LH was longest at 127 min (p < 0.005). The mean estimated blood loss was higher in the AH group (250 ml) compared to all minimally invasive surgery (MIS, 65-172 ml); p < 0.005). Conversion rates were 10% for LH, 4.8% for VH and 1.6% for RAH (p < 0.005). Hospitalization and patient-reported time to normal activities of daily living (ADL) were longer for AH compared to MIS (p < 0.005). Time to return to work was eight days longer in the AH group (35 days) compared with the MIS groups (p < 0.005). Complications were fewest in the VH group at 5.4% compared with AH 7.6% and RAH 8.7% (both p < 0.001), but did not significantly differ from the LH group at 6.6%. Overall patient satisfaction was reported to be 86-94% one year after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Women operated on for benign hysterectomy with minimally invasive methods in Sweden 2009-2015 had reduced length of hospitalization, as well as time to resuming normal ADL and return to work, compared to AH. Postoperative outcome measures were improved by minimally invasive methods and MIS should preferably be used.

摘要

目的

评估瑞典人群中行良性子宫切除术的手术途径,包括开腹手术和微创手术。

研究设计

前瞻性收集瑞典国家妇科手术登记处2009 - 2015年的数据:纳入13806例子宫切除术病例,包括开腹手术(AH,n = 7485)、经阴道手术(VH,n = 3767)、传统腹腔镜手术(LH,n = 1539)和机器人辅助手术(RAH,n = 1015)。

结果

VH组手术时间最短,为75分钟,AH组为97分钟,RAH组为104分钟。LH组最长,为127分钟(p < 0.005)。AH组平均估计失血量(250毫升)高于所有微创手术组(MIS,65 - 172毫升);p < 0.005)。LH组的中转率为10%,VH组为4.8%,RAH组为1.6%(p < 0.005)。与MIS相比,AH组的住院时间和患者报告的恢复正常日常生活(ADL)的时间更长(p < 0.005)。AH组恢复工作的时间比MIS组长8天(35天)(p < 0.005)。VH组并发症最少,为5.4%,AH组为7.6%,RAH组为8.7%(均p < 0.001),但与LH组的6.6%无显著差异。据报告,术后一年患者总体满意度为86 - 94%。

结论

与开腹手术相比,2009 - 2015年在瑞典接受良性子宫切除术的女性采用微创手术,住院时间、恢复正常ADL和恢复工作的时间均缩短。微创手术改善了术后结局指标,应优先使用MIS。

相似文献

1
A Swedish population-based evaluation of benign hysterectomy, comparing minimally invasive and abdominal surgery.一项基于瑞典人群的良性子宫切除术评估,比较微创和开腹手术。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Mar;222:113-118. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.01.019. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
2
Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.良性妇科疾病子宫切除术的手术入路
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 12;2015(8):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub5.
3
The impact of surgeon volume on perioperative adverse events in women undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for the large uterus.手术医生手术量对大子宫行微创子宫切除术的围手术期不良事件的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;219(5):490.e1-490.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 14.
4
Perioperative outcomes of total laparoscopic hysterectomy at a regional hospital in New Zealand.新西兰一家地区医院全腹腔镜子宫切除术的围手术期结局
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Feb;57(1):81-86. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12570.
5
A population-based registry study evaluating surgery in newly diagnosed uterine cancer.一项基于人群的登记研究,评估新诊断子宫癌的手术治疗情况。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016 Aug;95(8):901-11. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12918. Epub 2016 May 27.
6
Effects of Obesity on Peri- and Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Robotic versus Conventional Hysterectomy.肥胖对机器人辅助与传统子宫切除术患者围手术期结局的影响。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Feb;28(2):228-236. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.04.038. Epub 2020 May 6.
7
Approaches for hysterectomy and implementation of robot-assisted surgery in benign gynaecological disease: A cost analysis study in a large university hospital.良性妇科疾病的子宫切除术方法和机器人辅助手术的实施:大型大学医院的成本分析研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024 Oct;301:105-113. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.07.060. Epub 2024 Jul 27.
8
EVALUATE hysterectomy trial: a multicentre randomised trial comparing abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic methods of hysterectomy.评估子宫切除术试验:一项比较腹部、阴道和腹腔镜子宫切除方法的多中心随机试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Jun;8(26):1-154. doi: 10.3310/hta8260.
9
Route of hysterectomy and surgical outcomes from a statewide gynecologic oncology population: is there a role for vaginal hysterectomy?全州市妇科肿瘤患者子宫切除术的途径与手术结果:阴道子宫切除术有作用吗?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Mar;214(3):348.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.006. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
10
Association of Race/Ethnicity with Surgical Route and Perioperative Outcomes of Hysterectomy for Leiomyomas.种族/民族与子宫肌瘤子宫切除术手术途径和围手术期结局的关联。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Jul;28(7):1403-1410.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.11.008. Epub 2020 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of Perioperative Transfusion Risk for Benign Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy Utilizing the ACS-NSQIP.利用美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)评估良性微创子宫切除术围手术期输血风险
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 May;36(5):1067-1075. doi: 10.1007/s00192-025-06113-1. Epub 2025 Apr 1.
2
Why not vaginal?-Nationwide trends and surgical outcomes in low-risk hysterectomies: A retrospective cohort study.为何不选择经阴道手术?低风险子宫切除术的全国性趋势及手术结果:一项回顾性队列研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2025 May;104(5):958-967. doi: 10.1111/aogs.15099. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
3
Intracranial pressure estimated non-invasively and postoperative outcomes in surgery in the Trendelenburg position with pneumoperitoneum.
气腹下特伦德伦伯格体位手术中颅内压的无创估计及术后结果
J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2025 Feb 17;5(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s44158-025-00229-y.
4
Robotic Surgery in Gynaecology: A Retrospective Evaluation of an Experience at a Single Centre.妇科机器人手术:单中心经验的回顾性评估
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2024 Feb;74(1):53-59. doi: 10.1007/s13224-023-01852-x. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
5
Hysterectomy Profile in King Edward Memorial Hospital, Pune, India: Indications, Routes of Surgery, and Complications.印度浦那爱德华国王纪念医院的子宫切除术概况:手术指征、手术途径及并发症
Cureus. 2024 Jan 10;16(1):e52031. doi: 10.7759/cureus.52031. eCollection 2024 Jan.
6
Robotic-assisted benign hysterectomy compared with laparoscopic, vaginal, and open surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助良性子宫切除术与腹腔镜、阴道和开腹手术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Dec;17(6):2647-2662. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01724-6. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
7
Quality of Life after Risk-Reducing Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer Prevention: A Systematic Review.子宫内膜癌预防中降低风险子宫切除术后的生活质量:一项系统评价。
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Nov 26;14(23):5832. doi: 10.3390/cancers14235832.
8
Healthcare and Indirect Cost of the Laparoscopic vs. Vaginal Approach in Benign Hysterectomy.腹腔镜与经阴道手术治疗良性子宫切除术后的医疗保健和间接成本。
JSLS. 2022 Jul-Sep;26(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00048.
9
Changes in route of hysterectomy in Norway since introduction of robotic approach.自引入机器人手术方法以来挪威子宫切除术手术途径的变化。
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2021 Mar 31;13(1):35-40. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.13.1.005.
10
Racial/Ethnic Differences in the Risk of Surgical Complications and Posthysterectomy Hospitalization among Women Undergoing Hysterectomy for Benign Conditions.良性疾病行子宫切除术的女性患者中,手术并发症和子宫切除术后住院风险的种族/民族差异。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 May;28(5):1022-1032.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.12.032. Epub 2021 Jan 1.