Ma Lin, Wu Yue, Xu Wenjiang, Hammack Stephen D, Lee Tonghun, Carter Campbell D
Appl Opt. 2016 Jul 10;55(20):5310-5. doi: 10.1364/AO.55.005310.
The goal of this work was to contrast and compare the 2D and 3D flame topography of a turbulent flame. The 2D measurements were obtained using CH-based (methylidyne radical-based) planar laser-induced fluorescence (PLIF), and the 3D measurements were obtained through a tomographic chemiluminescence (TC) technique. Both PLIF and TC were performed simultaneously on a turbulent premixed Bunsen flame. The PLIF measurements were then compared to a cross section of the 3D TC measurements, both to provide a validation to the 3D measurements and also to illustrate the differences in flame structures inferred from the 2D and 3D measurements.
这项工作的目标是对比和比较湍流火焰的二维和三维火焰形貌。二维测量通过基于CH（基于亚甲基自由基）的平面激光诱导荧光（PLIF）获得，三维测量则通过断层扫描化学发光（TC）技术获得。PLIF和TC同时应用于一个湍流预混本生火焰。然后将PLIF测量结果与三维TC测量结果的一个横截面进行比较，既为三维测量提供验证，也用以说明从二维和三维测量推断出的火焰结构差异。
