Tucker Katherine, Branson Janice, Dilleen Maria, Hollis Sally, Loughlin Paul, Nixon Mark J, Williams Zoë
Roche Products Ltd, 6 Falcon Way, Shire Park, Welwyn Garden City, AL7 1TW, UK.
Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Jul 8;16 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0169-4.
Greater transparency and, in particular, sharing of patient-level data for further scientific research is an increasingly important topic for the pharmaceutical industry and other organisations who sponsor and conduct clinical trials as well as generally in the interests of patients participating in studies. A concern remains, however, over how to appropriately prepare and share clinical trial data with third party researchers, whilst maintaining patient confidentiality. Clinical trial datasets contain very detailed information on each participant. Risk to patient privacy can be mitigated by data reduction techniques. However, retention of data utility is important in order to allow meaningful scientific research. In addition, for clinical trial data, an excessive application of such techniques may pose a public health risk if misleading results are produced. After considering existing guidance, this article makes recommendations with the aim of promoting an approach that balances data utility and privacy risk and is applicable across clinical trial data holders.
Our key recommendations are as follows: 1. Data anonymisation/de-identification: Data holders are responsible for generating de-identified datasets which are intended to offer increased protection for patient privacy through masking or generalisation of direct and some indirect identifiers. 2. Controlled access to data, including use of a data sharing agreement: A legally binding data sharing agreement should be in place, including agreements not to download or further share data and not to attempt to seek to identify patients. Appropriate levels of security should be used for transferring data or providing access; one solution is use of a secure 'locked box' system which provides additional safeguards. This article provides recommendations on best practices to de-identify/anonymise clinical trial data for sharing with third-party researchers, as well as controlled access to data and data sharing agreements. The recommendations are applicable to all clinical trial data holders. Further work will be needed to identify and evaluate competing possibilities as regulations, attitudes to risk and technologies evolve.
更高的透明度,尤其是共享患者层面的数据以进行进一步的科学研究,对于制药行业以及其他赞助和开展临床试验的组织而言,是一个日益重要的话题,总体而言也符合参与研究的患者的利益。然而,如何在保持患者保密性的同时,适当地准备并与第三方研究人员共享临床试验数据,仍然是一个令人担忧的问题。临床试验数据集包含有关每个参与者的非常详细的信息。数据缩减技术可以减轻对患者隐私的风险。然而,保留数据效用对于进行有意义的科学研究很重要。此外,对于临床试验数据,如果产生误导性结果,过度应用此类技术可能会带来公共健康风险。在考虑现有指南后,本文提出了一些建议,旨在推广一种平衡数据效用和隐私风险且适用于所有临床试验数据持有者的方法。
我们的主要建议如下:1. 数据匿名化/去识别化:数据持有者有责任生成去识别化数据集,旨在通过屏蔽或泛化直接和一些间接标识符来增强对患者隐私的保护。2. 对数据的受控访问,包括使用数据共享协议:应制定具有法律约束力的数据共享协议,包括不下载或进一步共享数据以及不试图识别患者的协议。传输数据或提供访问时应使用适当级别的安全性;一种解决方案是使用安全的“锁定箱”系统,该系统提供额外的保障措施。本文提供了关于对临床试验数据进行去识别化/匿名化以与第三方研究人员共享的最佳实践建议,以及对数据的受控访问和数据共享协议。这些建议适用于所有临床试验数据持有者。随着法规、风险态度和技术的发展,需要进一步开展工作来识别和评估相互竞争的可能性。