Uslenghi G, Vater A, Rodríguez Aguilar S, Cabodevila J, Callejas S
CONICET fellowship (CIVETAN), Campus Universitario, Tandil, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Área de Reproducción, Centro de Investigación Veterinaria de Tandil, (CIVETAN, CONICET-CICPBA), FISFARVET, Fac. de Cs. Veterinarias, U.N.C.P.B.A, Tandil, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Reprod Domest Anim. 2016 Oct;51(5):693-9. doi: 10.1111/rda.12732. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of different ovulation inducers on E-17β plasma concentrations, synchronized ovulations and pregnancy rates. In Experiment 1, cows received a progesterone intravaginal device (PID) with 1 g of progesterone (P4) plus 2 mg of estradiol benzoate (EB) (day 0). At PID removal (day 8), cows received 0.150 mg of D-cloprostenol and were randomly assigned to four treatment groups (n = 10/treatment): Group ECP: 1 mg of estradiol cypionate at PID removal, Group EB: 1 mg of EB 24 hr after PID removal, Group GnRH: 10 μg of GnRH 48 hr after PID removal, Group ECP-GnRH: 1 mg of ECP at PID removal plus 10 μg of GnRH 48 hr later. Ultrasonographic examinations were performed to detect the dominant follicle and ovulation. GnRH-treated cows ovulated later (p < .05) compared to ECP- and ECP+GnRH-treated cows. There were effects of treatment, time and their interaction on E-17β concentrations (p < .05). ECP treatment affected plasma E-17β concentration, which increased earlier and decreased later compared to treatments without ECP. In Experiment 2, cows received (i) ECP: n = 126; (ii) EB: n = 126; (iii) GnRH: n = 136; (iv) ECP+GnRH: n = 139; FTAI was performed 48-50 hr after PID removal. Pregnancy rates did not differ among ovulation inducers (p > .05; ECP: 54.0%, 68/126; EB: 49.2%, 62/126; GnRH: 40.4%, 55/136; ECP+GnRH: 43.9%, 61/139). In conclusion, ECP administration (ECP and ECP+GnRH treatments) affected E-17β concentrations, determining its earlier increase and later decrease compared to treatments without ECP (EB and GnRH treatments). ECP+GnRH-treated cows achieved the best distribution of ovulations without affecting pregnancy rates.
进行了两项实验,以评估不同排卵诱导剂对血浆E-17β浓度、同步排卵和妊娠率的影响。在实验1中,奶牛在第0天接受含1 g孕酮(P4)加2 mg苯甲酸雌二醇(EB)的阴道孕酮装置(PID)。在取出PID时(第8天),奶牛接受0.150 mg D-氯前列醇,并随机分为四个治疗组(每组n = 10):ECP组:在取出PID时注射1 mg环丙孕酮;EB组:在取出PID后24小时注射1 mg EB;GnRH组:在取出PID后48小时注射10 μg GnRH;ECP-GnRH组:在取出PID时注射1 mg ECP,48小时后注射10 μg GnRH。通过超声检查检测优势卵泡和排卵情况。与ECP组和ECP+GnRH组相比,GnRH治疗组的奶牛排卵时间较晚(p < 0.05)。治疗、时间及其相互作用对E-17β浓度有影响(p < 0.05)。ECP治疗影响血浆E-17β浓度,与未使用ECP的治疗相比,其浓度升高更早且下降更晚。在实验2中,奶牛接受(i)ECP:n = 126;(ii)EB:n = 126;(iii)GnRH:n = 136;(iv)ECP+GnRH:n = 139;在取出PID后48 - 50小时进行定时人工授精(FTAI)。不同排卵诱导剂的妊娠率没有差异(p > 0.05;ECP组:54.0%,68/126;EB组:49.2%,62/126;GnRH组:40.4%,55/136;ECP+GnRH组:43.9%,61/139)。总之,给予ECP(ECP组和ECP+GnRH组治疗)会影响E-17β浓度,与未使用ECP的治疗(EB组和GnRH组治疗)相比,其浓度升高更早且下降更晚。接受ECP+GnRH治疗的奶牛排卵分布最佳,且不影响妊娠率。