Kolarić K, Vukas D, Potrebica V
Central Institute for Tumors and Allied Diseases, Zagreb, Yugoslavia.
Tumori. 1989 Apr 30;75(2):132-6. doi: 10.1177/030089168907500210.
Based on favorable results we reported earlier with the CAP regimen in breast cancer (CAP vs CMFVP), the present study compared the CAP with the FAC regimen, which is so far one of the most active adriamycin containing chemotherapy regimens in breast cancer. The aim of the study was to find the optimal first line treatment and possibly evaluate the role of cis platinum in breast cancer chemotherapy. The CAP schedule consisted of cyclophosphamide 200 mg/m2 i.v. days 1, 3 and 5, adriamycin 40 mg/m2 i.v. day 1, and platinum 30 mg/m2 i.v. day 1, 3 and 5. The FAC schedule included 5-FU 500 mg/m2 days 1 and 8, adriamycin 50 mg/m2 day 1, and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 day 1. One hundred and twenty-six previously untreated patients received greater than 2 cycles and were evaluated. In the CAP arm 15 complete (26%) and 24 partial remissions were observed, resulting in a 67% overall response rate (39/58). The response in soft tissue and visceral organs was notable (78% - 22/28, 71% - 15/21) with an important complete response rate (32%). In the FAC arm there was an overall response in 41% (28/68) of patients, with 8 complete (12%) and 20 partial responses. The difference in overall response, complete response, and response in soft tissue and visceral organs, was statistically significant in favor of the CAP arm (P less than 0.005). Concerning bone metastases there was no difference between the two schedules in response rate, nor in the median remission duration (CAP 11, FAC 10 months). In spite of a somewhat longer median survival in the CAP group, the difference (13 months vs 9 months) was not statistically significant (P = 0.10). Toxicity was moderate and tolerable in both regimens with more pronounced myelosuppression and vomiting in the CAP group. Compared with the FAC schedule the platinum containing combination chemotherapy (CAP) showed higher antitumor activity with no reflection on remission duration and survival.
基于我们之前报道的乳腺癌CAP方案(CAP与CMFVP对比)的良好结果,本研究将CAP与FAC方案进行了比较,FAC方案是目前乳腺癌中含阿霉素最有效的化疗方案之一。本研究的目的是找到最佳的一线治疗方案,并可能评估顺铂在乳腺癌化疗中的作用。CAP方案包括环磷酰胺200mg/m²静脉注射,第1、3和5天;阿霉素40mg/m²静脉注射,第1天;铂30mg/m²静脉注射,第1、3和5天。FAC方案包括5-氟尿嘧啶500mg/m²,第1和8天;阿霉素50mg/m²,第1天;环磷酰胺500mg/m²,第1天。126例未经治疗的患者接受了超过2个周期的治疗并进行了评估。在CAP组中,观察到15例完全缓解(26%)和24例部分缓解,总缓解率为67%(39/58)。软组织和内脏器官的缓解显著(78% - 22/28,71% - 15/21),完全缓解率较高(32%)。在FAC组中,41%(28/68)的患者有总体缓解,其中8例完全缓解(12%),20例部分缓解。总体缓解、完全缓解以及软组织和内脏器官缓解方面的差异在统计学上显著有利于CAP组(P小于0.005)。关于骨转移,两种方案在缓解率和中位缓解持续时间方面均无差异(CAP为11个月,FAC为10个月)。尽管CAP组的中位生存期稍长,但差异(13个月对9个月)无统计学意义(P = 0.10)。两种方案的毒性均为中度且可耐受,CAP组的骨髓抑制和呕吐更为明显。与FAC方案相比,含铂联合化疗(CAP)显示出更高的抗肿瘤活性,但对缓解持续时间和生存期无影响。