Shin J Y, Yoon S J, Ahn H S, Yun Y H
Seoul, Korea.
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2017 Apr;32(2):e206-e217. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2366. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
The aim of this study was to examine the impacts of a government-directed palliative care demonstration (PCD) project, Per-diem Payment System (PDPS), on length of stay (LOS), hospital costs, resource usage and healthcare quality during the searched period from January in 2009 to December in 2010.
A retrospective claim data review.
Individuals who had been eligible for the palliative care payment policy, PDPS, during 2 years (from 2009 to 2010) were assigned to the case group including seven hospitals (n = 3117). Those (seven hospitals) who were not come eligible for the palliative care payment policy were assigned to the control group (n = 2347) with fee for service. The data used in this study were electronically submitted requests of payment to the Health Insurance Review Agency during the period January 2009 to December 2010.
After the PCD project, the length of stay for palliative patients with cancer diseases decreased by 2.56% (β = -0.026; p-value = 0.0001) among patients hospitalized in a PCD project compared with patients hospitalized in seven hospitals that was not designed as a PCD project. Compared with costs before the PCD project, costs decreased by 0.76% (β = 0.013; p-value = 0.0001).
We provided evidence regarding the change in the societal burden due to palliative care. Although there was a reduction of direct medical costs reported in limited number of hospitals, in the long term, we can anticipate an expanding impact on medical costs in all palliative hospitals. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
本研究旨在探讨政府主导的姑息治疗示范(PCD)项目——每日支付系统(PDPS)在2009年1月至2010年12月的研究期间,对住院时间(LOS)、医院成本、资源使用及医疗质量的影响。
回顾性索赔数据审查。
在两年(2009年至2010年)期间符合姑息治疗支付政策(PDPS)的个体被分配到病例组,包括七家医院(n = 3117)。那些不符合姑息治疗支付政策的(七家医院)被分配到采用服务收费的对照组(n = 2347)。本研究使用的数据是2009年1月至2010年12月期间电子提交给健康保险审查机构的支付请求。
PCD项目实施后,与未设计为PCD项目的七家医院的住院患者相比,PCD项目住院的姑息性癌症患者住院时间减少了2.56%(β = -0.026;p值 = 0.0001)。与PCD项目实施前的成本相比,成本降低了0.76%(β = 0.013;p值 = 0.0001)。
我们提供了关于姑息治疗导致的社会负担变化的证据。尽管在少数医院报告了直接医疗成本的降低,但从长远来看,我们可以预期对所有姑息治疗医院的医疗成本会产生更大的影响。版权所有© 2016约翰威立父子有限公司。