Jorgensen Shea M, Carnahan Ryan M, Weckmann Michelle T
1 University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA.
2 University of Iowa College of Public Health, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 Sep;34(8):744-747. doi: 10.1177/1049909116658468. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
Delirium is common in home hospice patients and conveys significant morbidity to both patients and caregivers. The Delirium Observation Screening Scale (DOS) was developed to improve delirium recognition but has yet to be validated in the home hospice setting.
This pilot study aimed to explore the accuracy of the DOS for identifying delirium in home hospice patients.
Prospective delirium evaluation using a convenience sample.
SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Community hospice patients were approached for study inclusion.
Participants were assessed using the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised-98 (DRS-R-98), with results being categorized as "delirium" or "no delirium." The Delirium Observation Screening Scale scores, completed by hospice nurses during weekly patient assessment visits, were compared to the DRS-R-98 results.
Within this population, 30/78 (38%) assessments were categorized as delirious. In the majority of assessments, 69/75 (92%), the DRS-R-98 and DOS provided congruent results. There were 5 false positives and 1 false negative, demonstrating the DOS to be a clinically useful tool with a sensitivity of 0.97 and specificity of 0.89.
The DOS appears to be an accurate way to screen for delirium in home hospice patients. Validation of the DOS may help to improve delirium recognition and treatment and has the potential to increase quality of life in this vulnerable population. This input will also be taken into consideration in the development of a systematic screening procedure for delirium diagnosis at our local hospice, which we hope will be generalizable to other hospice agencies.
谵妄在居家临终关怀患者中很常见,给患者和照护者都带来了严重的发病率。谵妄观察筛查量表(DOS)旨在提高谵妄识别能力,但尚未在居家临终关怀环境中得到验证。
本试点研究旨在探讨DOS在识别居家临终关怀患者谵妄方面的准确性。
采用便利样本进行前瞻性谵妄评估。
地点/参与者:招募社区临终关怀患者纳入研究。
使用修订版谵妄评定量表98(DRS-R-98)对参与者进行评估,结果分为“谵妄”或“无谵妄”。将临终关怀护士在每周患者评估访视期间完成的谵妄观察筛查量表得分与DRS-R-98结果进行比较。
在该人群中,30/78(38%)的评估被归类为谵妄。在大多数评估中,69/75(92%),DRS-R-98和DOS结果一致。有5例假阳性和1例假阴性,表明DOS是一种临床有用的工具,敏感性为0.97,特异性为0.89。
DOS似乎是筛查居家临终关怀患者谵妄的一种准确方法。DOS的验证可能有助于改善谵妄的识别和治疗,并有可能提高这一脆弱人群的生活质量。在我们当地临终关怀机构制定谵妄诊断的系统筛查程序时,也将考虑这些意见,我们希望该程序能推广到其他临终关怀机构。