Govender Sendhil, Cheng Petrina Y, Dennis Danielle L, Colebatch James G
Prince of Wales Clinical School and Neuroscience Research Australia, University of New South Wales, Randwick, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia.
Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Randwick, Sydney, NSW 2031, Australia.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Aug;127(8):2846-2854. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.05.365. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
To investigate the properties of lateral electrode locations compared to the conventional ones and to bipolar compared to chin-referenced montages for recording ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (oVEMPs).
A total of 18 subjects were studied using 5 electrode locations around the eye, including the conventional location and more lateral ones (i.e. M, ML and L electrodes near the orbital margin, R1 and R2 electrodes below the two more medial ones). Unilateral air-conducted (AC) sound, bone-conducted (BC) impulses at the mastoid and BC vibration (500Hz) at the forehead were used. These were applied while the subjects looked in neutral gaze and with 4 levels of increasing elevation. A subset of 10 subjects were also studied when looking downwards at 4 levels. Five bipolar montages were created offline by subtraction.
The M and ML electrodes had the largest responses but responses were seen for all 5 electrodes. The chin reference was associated with substantial pickup from the contralateral side (as judged using unilateral AC stimulation). The M-R1 (conventional) montage showed a significantly non-linear response to gaze angle, unlike the ML montages. The ML-R1 montage gave the largest responses. There was a clear change in latency for the conventional montage with downgaze for the AC and BC impulsive stimuli.
The ML active electrode has a more stable n1 latency, a larger and a more linear response to gaze angle than the conventional recording site, probably due to contamination by pickup of inferior rectus activity when using the conventional site.
The ML location is a better site for the active pickup for recording oVEMPs if the main object of study is the inferior oblique muscle and particularly if subjects have difficulty with upgaze.
研究与传统电极位置相比,外侧电极位置以及与下颌参考导联相比,双极导联在记录眼性前庭诱发肌源性电位(oVEMPs)方面的特性。
对18名受试者进行研究,使用眼周5个电极位置,包括传统位置以及更外侧的位置(即眼眶边缘附近的M、ML和L电极,以及内侧两个电极下方的R1和R2电极)。使用单侧气导(AC)声音、乳突处的骨导(BC)脉冲以及前额处的BC振动(500Hz)。在受试者平视以及眼球上抬4个递增水平时施加这些刺激。10名受试者的子集在向下注视4个水平时也进行了研究。通过减法离线创建了5种双极导联。
M和ML电极的反应最大,但所有5个电极均有反应。下颌参考导联与来自对侧的大量信号采集相关(通过单侧AC刺激判断)。与ML导联不同,M - R1(传统)导联对注视角度表现出明显的非线性反应。ML - R1导联的反应最大。对于AC和BC脉冲刺激,传统导联的潜伏期在向下注视时发生了明显变化。
与传统记录部位相比,ML活性电极的n1潜伏期更稳定,对注视角度的反应更大且更呈线性,这可能是由于使用传统部位时受下直肌活动信号采集的干扰。
如果主要研究对象是下斜肌,特别是当受试者上视困难时,ML位置是记录oVEMPs活性采集的更佳部位。