Popma J J, Eichhorn E J, Dehmer G J
Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory, Dallas Veterans Administration Medical Center, Texas 75216.
Am J Cardiol. 1989 Jul 15;64(3):131-8. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90445-1.
Several techniques exist for the quantification of absolute coronary artery diameters using radiologic methods. An in vivo assessment of a quantitative technique based on direct digitally acquired images was performed by imaging inflated angioplasty balloons (n = 25), balloon catheter shafts (n = 16) and coronary guidewires (n = 20) at the time of coronary angioplasty. After this, the actual size of the objects was determined with a micrometer. Diameters measured by the quantitative digital method had an excellent correlation with the actual diameters (digital diameter = 0.80 [actual diameter] + 0.32; n = 61; r = 0.97; standard error of the estimate = 0.26 mm; p less than 0.001). Moreover, the correlation between interobserver and intraobserver measurements was excellent (r = 0.99 for both, standard error of the estimate = 0.16 mm and 0.09 mm, respectively). However, there was a consistent error present that was related to the size of the object measured. Objects less than 0.5 mm were consistently overestimated and objects greater than 1 mm were usually underestimated by the digital technique, although the actual magnitude of the error was small. Objects less than 0.5 mm in diameter were overestimated by 0.41 +/- 0.11 mm and objects greater than 1 mm were underestimated by 0.23 +/- 0.19 mm. Based on an analysis of the error present, correction algorithms were formulated and tested prospectively using an additional 29 object measurements. This resulted in an improvement in the quantification of the diameters with a smaller magnitude of error. This in vivo assessment suggests that the rapid online assessment of absolute coronary artery diameters is possible, but also demonstrates important errors inherent in this method.
有多种利用放射学方法对冠状动脉绝对直径进行量化的技术。在冠状动脉血管成形术时,通过对充盈的血管成形术球囊(n = 25)、球囊导管杆(n = 16)和冠状动脉导丝(n = 20)进行成像,对基于直接数字采集图像的定量技术进行了体内评估。在此之后,用千分尺确定物体的实际尺寸。通过定量数字方法测量的直径与实际直径具有极好的相关性(数字直径 = 0.80[实际直径]+ 0.32;n = 61;r = 0.97;估计标准误差 = 0.26毫米;p < 0.001)。此外,观察者间和观察者内测量之间的相关性也非常好(两者r均 = 0.99,估计标准误差分别为0.16毫米和0.09毫米)。然而,存在与所测物体大小相关的一致性误差。尽管误差的实际幅度较小,但数字技术对小于0.5毫米的物体始终高估,对大于1毫米的物体通常低估。直径小于0.5毫米的物体被高估0.41±0.11毫米,直径大于1毫米的物体被低估0.23±0.19毫米。基于对存在误差的分析,制定了校正算法,并使用另外29次物体测量进行了前瞻性测试。这使得直径量化得到改善,误差幅度更小。这种体内评估表明,快速在线评估冠状动脉绝对直径是可能的,但也证明了该方法存在的重要误差。