• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低能量、高重复率与高能量、低重复率810纳米二极管激光用于中国女性腋毛去除的安全性和有效性

Safety and efficacy of low fluence, high repetition rate versus high fluence, low repetition rate 810-nm diode laser for axillary hair removal in Chinese women.

作者信息

Li Wenhai, Liu Chengyi, Chen Zhou, Cai Lin, Zhou Cheng, Xu Qianxi, Li Houmin, Zhang Jianzhong

机构信息

a Department of Dermatology , Peking University People's Hospital , Beijing China.

b Department of Dermatology , Peking University International Hospital , Beijing , China.

出版信息

J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2016 Nov;18(7):393-396. doi: 10.1080/14764172.2016.1197405. Epub 2016 Jul 19.

DOI:10.1080/14764172.2016.1197405
PMID:27419804
Abstract

BACKGROUND

High-fluence diode lasers with contact cooling have emerged as the gold standard to remove unwanted hair. Lowering the energy should result in less pain and could theoretically affect the efficacy of the therapy.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and efficacy of a low fluence high repetition rate 810-nm diode laser to those of a high fluence, low repetition rate diode laser for permanent axillary hair removal in Chinese women.

METHODS

Ninety-two Chinese women received four axillae laser hair removal treatments at 4-week intervals using the low fluence, high repetition rate 810-nm diode laser in super hair removal (SHR) mode on one side and the high fluence, low repetition rate diode laser in hair removal (HR) mode on the other side. Hair counts were done at each follow-up visit and 6-month follow-up after the final laser treatment using a "Hi Quality Hair Analysis Program System"; the immediate pain score after each treatment session was recorded by a visual analog scale.

RESULTS

The overall median reduction of hair was 90.2% with the 810-nm diode laser in SHR mode and 87% with the same laser in HR mode at 6-month follow-up. The median pain scores in SHR mode and in HR mode were 2.75 and 6.75, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Low fluence, high repetition rate diode laser can efficiently remove unwanted hair but also significantly improve tolerability and reduce adverse events during the course of treatment.

摘要

背景

带有接触式冷却的高能量密度二极管激光器已成为去除多余毛发的金标准。降低能量应会减少疼痛,并且从理论上讲可能会影响治疗效果。

目的

比较低能量密度、高重复频率810纳米二极管激光器与高能量密度、低重复频率二极管激光器对中国女性永久性腋毛去除的安全性和有效性。

方法

92名中国女性接受了4次腋部激光脱毛治疗,每隔4周进行一次,一侧使用低能量密度、高重复频率810纳米二极管激光器的超脉冲脱毛(SHR)模式,另一侧使用高能量密度、低重复频率二极管激光器的脱毛(HR)模式。每次随访以及最后一次激光治疗后6个月随访时,使用“高品质毛发分析程序系统”进行毛发计数;每次治疗后立即使用视觉模拟量表记录疼痛评分。

结果

在6个月随访时,810纳米二极管激光器SHR模式下毛发总体减少中位数为90.2%,HR模式下为87%。SHR模式和HR模式下的疼痛评分中位数分别为2.75和6.75。

结论

低能量密度、高重复频率二极管激光器能够有效去除多余毛发,还能显著提高耐受性并减少治疗过程中的不良事件。

相似文献

1
Safety and efficacy of low fluence, high repetition rate versus high fluence, low repetition rate 810-nm diode laser for axillary hair removal in Chinese women.低能量、高重复率与高能量、低重复率810纳米二极管激光用于中国女性腋毛去除的安全性和有效性
J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2016 Nov;18(7):393-396. doi: 10.1080/14764172.2016.1197405. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
2
Safety and efficacy of low-fluence, high-repetition rate versus high-fluence, low-repetition rate 810-nm diode laser for permanent hair removal--a split-face comparison study.低能量、高重复频率与高能量、低重复频率810纳米二极管激光用于永久性脱毛的安全性和有效性——一项半脸对照研究
J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2011 Aug;13(4):134-7. doi: 10.3109/14764172.2011.594057. Epub 2011 Jun 21.
3
Split-leg comparison of low fluence diode laser and high fluence intense pulsed light in permanent hair reduction in skin types III to IV.Ⅲ至Ⅳ型皮肤中低能量二极管激光与高光强脉冲光脱毛的分腿对照研究。
Australas J Dermatol. 2012 Aug;53(3):186-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-0960.2012.00879.x. Epub 2012 Mar 19.
4
A split axilla comparison study of axillary hair removal with low fluence high repetition rate 810 nm diode laser vs. high fluence low repetition rate 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser.低能量高重复率 810nm 半导体激光与高能量低重复率 1064nmNd:YAG 激光去除腋毛的劈开腋窝对比研究。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012 Sep;26(9):1133-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04231.x. Epub 2011 Sep 19.
5
Permanent laser hair removal with low fluence high repetition rate versus high fluence low repetition rate 810 nm diode laser--a split leg comparison study.低能量高重复率与高能量低重复率810纳米二极管激光进行永久性激光脱毛——一项双腿对照研究。
J Drugs Dermatol. 2009 Nov;8(11 Suppl):s14-7.
6
A comparison of two 810 diode lasers for hair removal: low fluence, multiple pass versus a high fluence, single pass technique.两种810二极管激光用于脱毛的比较:低能量密度、多次照射与高能量密度、单次照射技术
Lasers Surg Med. 2014 Apr;46(4):270-4. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22226.
7
Low fluence-high repetition rate diode laser hair removal 12-month evaluation: reducing pain and risks while keeping clinical efficacy.低能量高重复率二极管激光脱毛12个月评估:在保持临床疗效的同时减轻疼痛和风险。
Lasers Surg Med. 2012 Apr;44(4):277-81. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22021. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
8
Long-term Comparison of a Large Spot Vacuum Assisted Handpiece vs the Small Spot Size Traditional Handpiece of the 800 nm Diode Laser.800纳米二极管激光的大型光斑真空辅助机头与小型光斑传统机头的长期比较
J Drugs Dermatol. 2017 Sep 1;16(9):893-898.
9
Photoepilation with a diode laser vs. intense pulsed light: a randomized, intrapatient left-to-right trial.二极管激光与强脉冲光脱毛的随机、自身左右对照试验。
Br J Dermatol. 2013 Jun;168(6):1287-93. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12182. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
10
Comparison of high-fluence, single-pass diode laser to low-fluence, multiple-pass diode laser for laser hair reduction with 18 months of follow up.高能量单通道二极管激光与低能量多通道二极管激光用于激光脱毛的比较:18个月随访
J Drugs Dermatol. 2011 Jan;10(1):62-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Trunk hair removal treatment with diode laser 810 nm in men population.810纳米二极管激光用于男性躯干脱毛治疗。
Dermatol Reports. 2023 Aug 25;16(1):9736. doi: 10.4081/dr.2023.9736. eCollection 2024 Mar 12.
2
Comparison of efficacy and safety of a novel 755-nm diode laser with conventional 755-nm alexandrite laser in reduction of axillary hairs.新型 755nm 半导体激光与传统 755nm 翠绿宝石激光脱毛的疗效和安全性比较。
Lasers Med Sci. 2020 Mar;35(2):373-378. doi: 10.1007/s10103-019-02829-x. Epub 2019 Jul 5.