Suppr超能文献

外伤性黄斑裂孔的治疗方式:一项系统评价和单臂荟萃分析

Management Modalities for Traumatic Macular Hole: A Systematic Review and Single-Arm Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Gao Min, Liu Kun, Lin Qiurong, Liu Haiyun

机构信息

a Department of Ophthalmology , Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine , Shanghai , People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Curr Eye Res. 2017 Feb;42(2):287-296. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2016.1175021. Epub 2016 Jul 15.

Abstract

PURPOSES

The purposes of this study were to (i) determine macular hole (MH) closure rates and visual outcomes by comparing two methods of managing traumatic MH (TMH)-an event resulting in severe loss of visual acuity (VA); (ii) characterize patients who undergo spontaneous TMH closure; (iii) determine which TMH patients should be observed before resorting to surgical repair; and (iv) elucidate factors that influence postoperative visual outcomes.

METHODS

Studies (n=10) of patients who were managed by surgery or observation for TMH were meta-analyzed retrospectively. Management modalities included surgical repair (surgery group) and observation for spontaneous hole closure (observation group). In addition, a 12-case series of articles (1990-2014) on spontaneous hole closure was statistically summarized. SAS and Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) (version 3.0) were used for analysis.

RESULTS

For surgery group patients, the fixed-model pooled event rate for hole closure was 0.919 (range, 0.861-0.954) and for observation group patients, 0.368 (range, 0.236-0.448). The random-model pooled event rate for improvement of visual acuity (VA) for surgery group patients was 0.748 (range, 0.610-0.849) and for observation group patients, 0.505 (range, 0.397-0.613). For patients in both groups, the mean age of spontaneous closure was 18.71±10.64 years; mean size of TMHs, 0.18±0.06 decimal degrees (DD); and mean time for hole closure, 3.38±3.08 months. The pooled event rate for visual improvement was 0.748 (0.610-0.849).

CONCLUSIONS

Hole closure and VA improvement rates of surgery group patients were significantly higher than those for observation group patients. Patients of ≤ 24 years of age with MH sizes of ≤ 0.2DD were more likely to achieve spontaneous hole closure. The interval of time from injury to surgery was statistically significantly associated with the level of visual improvement.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是:(i)通过比较两种治疗外伤性黄斑裂孔(TMH,一种导致严重视力丧失的情况)的方法,确定黄斑裂孔(MH)的闭合率和视觉效果;(ii)描述经历TMH自发闭合的患者特征;(iii)确定哪些TMH患者在采取手术修复之前应进行观察;以及(iv)阐明影响术后视觉效果的因素。

方法

对10项关于TMH患者接受手术或观察治疗的研究进行回顾性荟萃分析。治疗方式包括手术修复(手术组)和观察自发裂孔闭合情况(观察组)。此外,对1990年至2014年关于自发裂孔闭合的12篇病例系列文章进行了统计总结。使用SAS和综合荟萃分析(CMA,版本3.0)进行分析。

结果

对于手术组患者,裂孔闭合的固定模型合并事件发生率为0.919(范围:0.861 - 0.954),对于观察组患者为0.368(范围:0.236 - 0.448)。手术组患者视力(VA)改善的随机模型合并事件发生率为0.748(范围:0.610 - 0.849),观察组患者为0.505(范围:0.397 - 0.613)。对于两组患者,自发闭合的平均年龄为18.71±10.64岁;TMH的平均大小为0.18±0.06小数度(DD);裂孔闭合的平均时间为3.38±3.08个月。视力改善的合并事件发生率为0.748(0.610 - 0.849)。

结论

手术组患者的裂孔闭合率和视力改善率显著高于观察组患者。年龄≤24岁且MH大小≤0.2DD的患者更有可能实现自发裂孔闭合。从受伤到手术的时间间隔与视力改善程度在统计学上显著相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验