Gao Min, Liu Kun, Lin Qiurong, Liu Haiyun
a Department of Ophthalmology , Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine , Shanghai , People's Republic of China.
Curr Eye Res. 2017 Feb;42(2):287-296. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2016.1175021. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
The purposes of this study were to (i) determine macular hole (MH) closure rates and visual outcomes by comparing two methods of managing traumatic MH (TMH)-an event resulting in severe loss of visual acuity (VA); (ii) characterize patients who undergo spontaneous TMH closure; (iii) determine which TMH patients should be observed before resorting to surgical repair; and (iv) elucidate factors that influence postoperative visual outcomes.
Studies (n=10) of patients who were managed by surgery or observation for TMH were meta-analyzed retrospectively. Management modalities included surgical repair (surgery group) and observation for spontaneous hole closure (observation group). In addition, a 12-case series of articles (1990-2014) on spontaneous hole closure was statistically summarized. SAS and Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) (version 3.0) were used for analysis.
For surgery group patients, the fixed-model pooled event rate for hole closure was 0.919 (range, 0.861-0.954) and for observation group patients, 0.368 (range, 0.236-0.448). The random-model pooled event rate for improvement of visual acuity (VA) for surgery group patients was 0.748 (range, 0.610-0.849) and for observation group patients, 0.505 (range, 0.397-0.613). For patients in both groups, the mean age of spontaneous closure was 18.71±10.64 years; mean size of TMHs, 0.18±0.06 decimal degrees (DD); and mean time for hole closure, 3.38±3.08 months. The pooled event rate for visual improvement was 0.748 (0.610-0.849).
Hole closure and VA improvement rates of surgery group patients were significantly higher than those for observation group patients. Patients of ≤ 24 years of age with MH sizes of ≤ 0.2DD were more likely to achieve spontaneous hole closure. The interval of time from injury to surgery was statistically significantly associated with the level of visual improvement.
本研究的目的是:(i)通过比较两种治疗外伤性黄斑裂孔(TMH,一种导致严重视力丧失的情况)的方法,确定黄斑裂孔(MH)的闭合率和视觉效果;(ii)描述经历TMH自发闭合的患者特征;(iii)确定哪些TMH患者在采取手术修复之前应进行观察;以及(iv)阐明影响术后视觉效果的因素。
对10项关于TMH患者接受手术或观察治疗的研究进行回顾性荟萃分析。治疗方式包括手术修复(手术组)和观察自发裂孔闭合情况(观察组)。此外,对1990年至2014年关于自发裂孔闭合的12篇病例系列文章进行了统计总结。使用SAS和综合荟萃分析(CMA,版本3.0)进行分析。
对于手术组患者,裂孔闭合的固定模型合并事件发生率为0.919(范围:0.861 - 0.954),对于观察组患者为0.368(范围:0.236 - 0.448)。手术组患者视力(VA)改善的随机模型合并事件发生率为0.748(范围:0.610 - 0.849),观察组患者为0.505(范围:0.397 - 0.613)。对于两组患者,自发闭合的平均年龄为18.71±10.64岁;TMH的平均大小为0.18±0.06小数度(DD);裂孔闭合的平均时间为3.38±3.08个月。视力改善的合并事件发生率为0.748(0.610 - 0.849)。
手术组患者的裂孔闭合率和视力改善率显著高于观察组患者。年龄≤24岁且MH大小≤0.2DD的患者更有可能实现自发裂孔闭合。从受伤到手术的时间间隔与视力改善程度在统计学上显著相关。