Jørgensen Jeanette Therming, Andersen John Sahl, Tjønneland Anne, Andersen Zorana Jovanovic
a Centre for Epidemiology and Screening, Department of Public Health , University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen , Denmark ;
b Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health , University of Copenhagen , Copenhagen , Denmark ;
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2016 Sep;34(3):240-9. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2016.1207141. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
This study aims to describe the determinants related to gender differences in the GP utilization in Danish population aged 50-65 years.
Cohort-based cross-sectional study.
Danish general practice.
Totally, 54,849 participants of the Danish Diet, Cancer and Health cohort (50-65 years).
The sum of cohort members' face-to-face consultations with general practitioner (GP) at the cohort baseline year (1993-1997). We obtained data on GP visits from the Danish National Health Service Register at the cohort baseline (1993-1997), when information on lifestyle (smoking, body mass index (BMI), alcohol use, physical activity), medical conditions (somatic and mental), employment, education, gravidity, and hormone therapy (HT) use was collected by questionnaire.
Women had on average 4.1 and men 2.8 consultations per year. In a crude model, women had 47% higher rate of GP visits than men (incidence rate ratio: 1.47; 95% Confidence Interval: 1.45-1.50), which remained unchanged after adjustment for lifestyle, socio-demographic and medical factors, but attenuated to 18% (1.18; 1.13-1.24) after adjustment for female factors (gravidity and post-menopausal HT. In a fully adjusted model, subjects with hypertension (1.63; 1.59-1.67), mental illness (1.63; 1.61-1.66), diabetes (1.56; 1.47-1.65), angina pectoris (1.28; 1.21-1.34), and unemployed persons (1.19; 1.18-1.21) had highest rates of GP visits.
Gravidity and HT use explain a large proportion, but not all of the gender difference in GP utilization. Medical conditions (somatic and mental) and unemployment are the main determinants of GP utilization in men and women, while lifestyle has minor effect. Key points Female gender remained a dominant determinant of GP utilization, after adjustment for lifestyle, socio-demography, medical and gender specific factors, with females consulting their GP 18% more often than males. Female reproductive factors (use of postmenopausal hormone therapy and gravidity) explained a large proportion of the gender variation in use of GP. Strongest determinants for GP use among Danish adults aged 50-65 years were the presence of medical conditions (somatic and mental) and unemployment, while lifestyle factors (e.g., body mass index, alcohol consumption and smoking) had minor effect.
本研究旨在描述丹麦50至65岁人群中与全科医生(GP)就诊性别差异相关的决定因素。
基于队列的横断面研究。
丹麦全科医疗。
丹麦饮食、癌症与健康队列中54849名参与者(年龄50 - 65岁)。
队列基线年份(1993 - 1997年)队列成员与全科医生面对面咨询的总数。我们从丹麦国家卫生服务登记处获取了队列基线(1993 - 1997年)时全科医生就诊的数据,当时通过问卷调查收集了生活方式(吸烟、体重指数(BMI)、饮酒、体育活动)、医疗状况(躯体和精神方面)、就业、教育、妊娠和激素治疗(HT)使用情况等信息。
女性平均每年就诊4.1次,男性为2.8次。在一个粗略模型中,女性的全科医生就诊率比男性高47%(发病率比:1.47;95%置信区间:1.45 - 1.50),在对生活方式、社会人口统计学和医疗因素进行调整后保持不变,但在对女性因素(妊娠和绝经后HT)进行调整后降至18%(1.18;1.13 - 1.24)。在一个完全调整模型中,患有高血压(1.63;1.59 - 1.67)、精神疾病(1.63;1.61 - 1.66)、糖尿病(1.56;1.47 - 1.65)、心绞痛(1.28;1.21 - 1.34)的患者以及失业者(1.19;1.18 - 1.21)的全科医生就诊率最高。
妊娠和HT的使用解释了很大一部分,但并非全部的全科医生就诊性别差异。医疗状况(躯体和精神方面)和失业是男性和女性全科医生就诊的主要决定因素,而生活方式的影响较小。要点 在对生活方式、社会人口统计学、医疗和性别特定因素进行调整后,女性性别仍然是全科医生就诊的主要决定因素,女性咨询全科医生的频率比男性高18%。女性生殖因素(绝经后激素治疗的使用和妊娠)解释了很大一部分全科医生就诊的性别差异。丹麦50至65岁成年人中全科医生就诊的最强决定因素是存在医疗状况(躯体和精神方面)和失业,而生活方式因素(如体重指数、饮酒和吸烟)的影响较小。