Suppr超能文献

一项运用理论领域框架的定性研究,旨在探究中风患者接受或未接受康复评估的原因。

A qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework to investigate why patients were or were not assessed for rehabilitation after stroke.

作者信息

Lynch Elizabeth A, Luker Julie A, Cadilhac Dominique A, Fryer Caroline E, Hillier Susan L

机构信息

1 International Centre for Allied Health Evidence, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.

2 Stroke Division, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Clin Rehabil. 2017 Jul;31(7):966-977. doi: 10.1177/0269215516658938. Epub 2016 Jul 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To explore the factors perceived to affect rehabilitation assessment and referral practices for patients with stroke.

DESIGN

Qualitative study using data from focus groups analysed thematically and then mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework.

SETTING

Eight acute stroke units in two states of Australia.

SUBJECTS

Health professionals working in acute stroke units.

INTERVENTIONS

Health professionals at all sites had participated in interventions to improve rehabilitation assessment and referral practices, which included provision of copies of an evidence-based decision-making rehabilitation Assessment Tool and pathway.

RESULTS

Eight focus groups were conducted (32 total participants). Reported rehabilitation assessment and referral practices varied markedly between units. Continence and mood were not routinely assessed (4 units), and people with stroke symptoms were not consistently referred to rehabilitation (4 units). Key factors influencing practice were identified and included whether health professionals perceived that use of the Assessment Tool would improve rehabilitation assessment practices (theoretical domain 'social and professional role'); beliefs about outcomes from changing practice such as increased equity for patients or conversely that changing rehabilitation referral patterns would not affect access to rehabilitation ('belief about consequences'); the influence of the unit's relationships with other groups including rehabilitation teams ('social influences' domain) and understanding within the acute stroke unit team of the purpose of changing assessment practices ('knowledge' domain).

CONCLUSION

This study has identified that health professionals' perceived roles, beliefs about consequences from changing practice and relationships with rehabilitation service providers were perceived to influence rehabilitation assessment and referral practices on Australian acute stroke units.

摘要

目的

探讨被认为会影响中风患者康复评估及转诊实践的因素。

设计

定性研究,采用焦点小组数据,进行主题分析,然后映射到理论领域框架。

背景

澳大利亚两个州的八个急性中风单元。

研究对象

在急性中风单元工作的卫生专业人员。

干预措施

所有地点的卫生专业人员都参与了旨在改善康复评估及转诊实践的干预措施,包括提供一份基于证据的决策康复评估工具及路径的副本。

结果

开展了八个焦点小组(共32名参与者)。各单元之间报告的康复评估及转诊实践差异显著。大小便失禁和情绪未进行常规评估(4个单元),有中风症状的患者未被一致转诊至康复科室(4个单元)。确定了影响实践的关键因素,包括卫生专业人员是否认为使用评估工具会改善康复评估实践(理论领域“社会和专业角色”);对改变实践结果的信念,如患者公平性增加,或者相反,改变康复转诊模式不会影响康复服务的获取(“对后果的信念”);单元与其他团队(包括康复团队)关系的影响(“社会影响”领域),以及急性中风单元团队对改变评估实践目的的理解(“知识”领域)。

结论

本研究已确定,卫生专业人员的感知角色、对改变实践后果的信念以及与康复服务提供者的关系被认为会影响澳大利亚急性中风单元的康复评估及转诊实践。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验