Suppr超能文献

药物给药途径对健康相关生活质量的影响:来自北欧2个国家双相情感障碍或精神分裂症患者时间权衡调查的结果。

The effect of the medicine administration route on health-related quality of life: Results from a time trade-off survey in patients with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia in 2 Nordic countries.

作者信息

Jørgensen Tine Rikke, Emborg Charlotte, Dahlen Karianne, Bøgelund Mette, Carlborg Andreas

机构信息

Medivir AB, Blasieholmsgatan 2, 111 48, Stockholm, Sweden.

OPUS Klinikken, Risskov, Denmark.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Jul 16;16:244. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0930-6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Agitation episodes are common among patients with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder. Oral and intramuscular administration methods are commonly used in pharmacological treatment of acute agitation. Recently, an innovative inhalation product with loxapine(Adasuve®)has become available for treatment of acute agitation episodes associated with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia. The objective for the present study was to investigate the impact of the pharmacological treatment's administration methods on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with bipolar disorder or schizophrenia in Denmark and Sweden using a time trade-off (TTO) approach.

METHODS

The TTO methodology was used to examine the HRQoL impact of administration method of pharmacological treatment of acute agitation. Data were collected via an internet-based survey, using an existing panel of respondents with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder.

RESULTS

Respondents considered living with schizophrenia/ bipolar disorder, having one yearly agitation episode treated with inhaler better than living with the same conditions and receiving treatment with tablet or injection. The utility value was 0.762 for inhalable treatment, 0.707 for injection and 0.734 for tablet treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients' preference for treatment delivery options showed that inhalation was associated with a significant utility gain when compared to injection or tablets. Inhalable loxapine may be a new tool for control of agitation episodes for strengthening the patient provider alliance when taking patient's preference for delivery method into consideration.

摘要

背景

激越发作在精神分裂症或双相情感障碍患者中很常见。口服和肌内注射给药方法常用于急性激越的药物治疗。最近,一种含洛沙平的创新吸入产品(阿立哌唑口腔崩解片)已可用于治疗与双相情感障碍或精神分裂症相关的急性激越发作。本研究的目的是采用时间权衡(TTO)方法,调查丹麦和瑞典双相情感障碍或精神分裂症患者中药物治疗给药方法对健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的影响。

方法

采用TTO方法来检验急性激越药物治疗给药方法对HRQoL的影响。通过基于网络的调查收集数据,使用现有的精神分裂症或双相情感障碍受访者小组。

结果

受访者认为,患精神分裂症/双相情感障碍且每年有一次激越发作并使用吸入器治疗,比处于相同状况但接受片剂或注射治疗更好。吸入治疗的效用值为0.762,注射治疗为0.707,片剂治疗为0.734。

结论

患者对治疗给药方式的偏好表明,与注射或片剂相比,吸入治疗有显著的效用提升。考虑到患者对给药方式的偏好,可吸入洛沙平可能是控制激越发作的新工具,有助于加强医患联盟。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd2c/4947276/d9dc8d30910f/12888_2016_930_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验