Suppr超能文献

改善治疗效果:精神科人群中治疗急性激越的药物制剂的可接受性

Enhancing Outcomes: Acceptability of Medication Formulations for the Treatment of Acute Agitation in a Psychiatric Population.

作者信息

Walker Rachel E, Nelson Leigh Anne, Kriz Carrie, Iuppa Courtney A, Liu Yifei, Diefenderfer Lauren A, Elliott Ellie S R, Sommi Roger W

机构信息

Kansas City VA Medical Center, 4801 Linwood Boulevard, Kansas City, MO 64128, USA.

University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Pharmacy, Division of Pharmacy Practice and Administration, 2464 Charlotte Street, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacy (Basel). 2022 Dec 23;11(1):4. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy11010004.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is limited research evaluating patient acceptability of medication formulations in the treatment of acute agitation. This study assessed patient acceptability of medication formulations (tablet, orally-dissolving-tablet [ODT], liquid, intramuscular injection [IM], inhaled device [INH]) for the treatment of acute agitation and examined correlating factors. METHODS: Adults with psychotic illness or bipolar disorder receiving emergency or inpatient services at an inpatient psychiatric facility in Kansas City, Missouri were included. Participants viewed a presentation on medication formulations for acute agitation and were surveyed on acceptability (measured on a five-point Likert scale). The primary outcome variable was the attitudinal measurement of acceptability of each formulation in correlation with the severity of agitation for use in themselves and other patients. RESULTS: One hundred participants completed the survey. Participants rated the following: (1) This medication formulation would be acceptable to treat mild agitation in themselves and others (oral tablet 85% and 48%; ODT 82% and 55%; liquid 74% and 51%; IM 53% and 74%; INH 78% and 72%); and (2) This medication formulation would be acceptable to treat severe agitation in themselves and others (oral tablet 75% and 52%; ODT 74% and 53%; liquid 66% and 53%; IM 61% and 67%; INH 77% and 72%). For treating mild agitation, participants preferred tablets and ODTs to the IM (p < 0.05) and the INH to liquid or IM (p < 0.05), for themselves; and oral formulations were preferred to the IM (p < 0.05) for other patients. For severe agitation in themselves and others, preference for the INH and IM versus oral formulations (p < 0.05) was significant, with no difference between the INH and IM (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of responses preferring oral formulations was higher than IM and INH. Dosage formulation acceptability differed depending on the severity of agitation and intended recipient of the medication.

摘要

背景

在急性激越治疗中,评估药物制剂患者可接受性的研究有限。本研究评估了用于治疗急性激越的药物制剂(片剂、口腔崩解片[ODT]、液体制剂、肌内注射[IM]、吸入装置[INH])的患者可接受性,并检查了相关因素。方法:纳入在密苏里州堪萨斯城一家住院精神科机构接受急诊或住院服务的患有精神疾病或双相情感障碍的成年人。参与者观看了关于急性激越药物制剂的演示,并接受了关于可接受性的调查(采用五点李克特量表测量)。主要结局变量是对每种制剂可接受性的态度测量,与用于自身及其他患者的激越严重程度相关。结果:100名参与者完成了调查。参与者对以下内容进行了评分:(1)这种药物制剂可接受用于治疗自身及他人的轻度激越(口服片剂分别为85%和48%;ODT分别为82%和55%;液体制剂分别为74%和51%;IM分别为53%和74%;INH分别为78%和72%);以及(2)这种药物制剂可接受用于治疗自身及他人的重度激越(口服片剂分别为75%和52%;ODT分别为74%和53%;液体制剂分别为66%和53%;IM分别为61%和67%;INH分别为77%和72%)。对于治疗轻度激越,参与者自身更倾向于片剂和ODT而非IM(p<0.05),更倾向于INH而非液体制剂或IM(p<0.05);对于其他患者,口服制剂比IM更受青睐(p<0.05)。对于自身及他人的重度激越,与口服制剂相比,对INH和IM的偏好(p<0.05)显著,INH和IM之间无差异(p>0.05)。结论:倾向于口服制剂的应答比例高于IM和INH。剂型的可接受性因激越严重程度和药物的预期接受者而异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0037/9844403/b0ebd3a61a50/pharmacy-11-00004-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验