Suppr超能文献

长效β受体激动剂联合或单独使用吸入器作为接受吸入性糖皮质激素治疗但哮喘控制不佳儿童的升级治疗方案

Long-Acting β-Agonist in Combination or Separate Inhaler as Step-Up Therapy for Children with Uncontrolled Asthma Receiving Inhaled Corticosteroids.

作者信息

Turner Steve, Richardson Kathryn, Murray Clare, Thomas Mike, Hillyer Elizabeth V, Burden Anne, Price David B

机构信息

Department of Child Health, Royal Aberdeen Children's Hospital, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.

Research in Real-life Ltd, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Jan-Feb;5(1):99-106.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.06.009. Epub 2016 Jul 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adding a long-acting β-agonist (LABA) to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) using a fixed-dose combination (FDC) inhaler is the UK guideline recommendation for children aged more than 4 years with uncontrolled asthma. The evidence of benefit of adding an FDC inhaler over a separate LABA inhaler is limited.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of a LABA added as an FDC inhaler, and as a separate inhaler, in children with uncontrolled asthma.

METHODS

Two UK primary care databases were used to create a matched cohort study with a 2-year follow-up period. We included children prescribed their first step-up from ICS monotherapy. Two cohorts were formed for children receiving an add-on LABA as an FDC inhaler, or a separate LABA inhaler. Matching variables and confounders were identified by comparing characteristics during a baseline year of follow-up. Outcomes were examined during the subsequent year. The primary outcome was an adjusted odds ratio for overall asthma control (defined as follows: no asthma-related hospital admission or emergency room visit, prescription for oral corticosteroids or antibiotic with evidence of respiratory consultation, and ≤2 puffs of short-acting β-agonist daily).

RESULTS

The final study consisted of 1330 children in each cohort (mean age 9 years; 59% male). In the separate ICS+LABA cohort, the odds of achieving overall asthma control were lower (adjusted odds ratio, 0.77 [95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.91]; P = .001) compared with the FDC cohort.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrates a small but significant benefit in achieving asthma control from an add-on LABA as an FDC, compared with a separate inhaler and this supports current guideline recommendations.

摘要

背景

对于4岁以上哮喘控制不佳的儿童,英国指南建议使用固定剂量联合(FDC)吸入器将长效β受体激动剂(LABA)添加到吸入性糖皮质激素(ICS)中。相较于单独使用LABA吸入器,添加FDC吸入器的益处证据有限。

目的

本研究的目的是比较将LABA作为FDC吸入器添加和作为单独吸入器添加在哮喘控制不佳儿童中的有效性。

方法

使用两个英国初级保健数据库创建了一项为期2年随访期的匹配队列研究。我们纳入了首次从ICS单药治疗升级的儿童。接受LABA作为FDC吸入器添加或单独LABA吸入器添加的儿童形成了两个队列。通过比较随访基线年的特征来确定匹配变量和混杂因素。在随后的一年中检查结局。主要结局是总体哮喘控制的调整比值比(定义如下:无哮喘相关的住院或急诊室就诊、有呼吸科会诊证据的口服糖皮质激素或抗生素处方,以及每日≤2吸短效β受体激动剂)。

结果

每个队列的最终研究包括1330名儿童(平均年龄9岁;59%为男性)。在单独使用ICS+LABA的队列中,与FDC队列相比,实现总体哮喘控制的几率较低(调整比值比,0.77[95%置信区间,0.66-0.91];P = 0.001)。

结论

该研究表明,与单独使用吸入器相比,将LABA作为FDC添加在实现哮喘控制方面有小但显著的益处,这支持了当前的指南建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验