Frengopoulos Courtney, Burley Joshua, Viana Ricardo, Payne Michael W, Hunter Susan W
School of Health Sciences, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Mar;98(3):450-455. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.06.012. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
To determine whether scores on a cognitive measure are associated with walking endurance and functional mobility of individuals with transfemoral or transtibial amputations at discharge from inpatient prosthetic rehabilitation.
Retrospective cohort study.
Rehabilitation hospital.
Consecutive admissions (N=176; mean age ± SD, 64.27±13.23y) with transfemoral or transtibial amputation that had data at admission and discharge from an inpatient prosthetic rehabilitation program.
Not applicable.
Cognitive status was assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The L Test and the 2-minute walk test (2MWT) were used to estimate functional mobility and walking endurance.
The mean ± SD MoCA score was 24.05±4.09 (range, 6-30), and 56.3% of patients had scores <26. MoCA scores had a small positive correlation with the 2MWT (r=.29, P<.01), and a small negative correlation to the L Test (r=-.24, P<.01). In multivariable linear regression, compared with people with the highest MoCA score quartile, there was no difference on the 2MWT, but people in the lowest 2 quartiles took longer to complete the L Test.
Cognitive impairment was very prevalent. The association between MoCA and functional mobility was statistically significant. These results highlight the potential for differences on complex motor tasks for individuals with cognitive impairment but does not indicate a need to exclude them from rehabilitation on the basis of cognitive impairment alone.
确定在住院假肢康复出院时,认知测量得分是否与经股截肢或经胫截肢患者的步行耐力和功能活动能力相关。
回顾性队列研究。
康复医院。
连续收治的经股截肢或经胫截肢患者(N = 176;平均年龄±标准差,64.27±13.23岁),这些患者在住院假肢康复项目入院和出院时均有数据。
不适用。
使用蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)评估认知状态。使用L测试和2分钟步行测试(2MWT)评估功能活动能力和步行耐力。
MoCA评分的平均值±标准差为24.05±4.09(范围为6 - 30),56.3%的患者得分<26。MoCA评分与2MWT呈小的正相关(r = 0.29,P <.01),与L测试呈小的负相关(r = - .24,P <.01)。在多变量线性回归中,与MoCA得分最高四分位数的人相比,2MWT没有差异,但最低两个四分位数的人完成L测试所需时间更长。
认知障碍非常普遍。MoCA与功能活动能力之间的关联具有统计学意义。这些结果凸显了认知障碍个体在复杂运动任务上存在差异的可能性,但并不表明仅基于认知障碍就需要将他们排除在康复之外。